Straight Up Bullshit From Romney

You would expect that Mitt Romney would know enough not to make campaign promises that are blatantly false and in no conceivable way could be acted on. But that’s exactly what he did this past Friday when explaining why college students should vote for him:

Kallie Durkit: “Relatability has been a large issue for you on this campaign trail, and as a college student many people in my generation find it especially hard to relate to you as a candidate,” said 21-year-old Kallie Durkit, who attends Bowling Green State University in Ohio. “Why should we mobilize for you as a candidate instead of Obama, which we did in 2008?”

Mitt Romney: “What I can promise you is this – when you get out of college, if I’m president you’ll have a job,” said Romney. “If President Obama is reelected, you will not be able to get a job. That’s the reason I will hopefully get young people who are in college is to say, You know what, I understand what it takes to get jobs in America.”

The most ridiculous part about this statement is that he ‘promises’ poor little Kallie Durkit that  she won’t get a job if Obama is reelected.  It’s not like he’s just asserting that he can do a better job than Obama, but that voting for Obama is equivalent to economic apocalypse — a world where all college students are unemployed.

This is not a one-off gaffe. Instead, it follows a long line of distortions and flat out lies made by the Romney campaign in their quest to dupe the American public into voting for him. The media has to keep Romney accountable for saying auch transparently false statements. It’s absurd enough already that he has maintained an aura of integrity and consistency for so long when nothing could be farther from the truth.

Comments

  1. JimC146 says:

    What’s more straight up B.S.? what Romney said or the fact that Kallie Durkit feels that Obama was relate-able in 2008 (wealthy politician from Chicago promising hope and change) ignoring the fact that Obama straight up B.S.’d his way into the hearts and minds of college students in 2008, many of whom I’m sure are still looking for a job… He brought the hope, forgot the change.

    I don’t think Romney has a leg to stand on. He can’t make the same kind of BS promises Obama made and expect anyone to buy it. American’s are getting tired of hollow promises from politicians on the campaign trail especially after the Hope and Change President failed to deliver…I’ll give Obama props for actually allowing the military to go after Bin Laden, beyond that, what has he accomplished, especially from his Hope and Change promise list.

  2. nathan says:

    I’m pretty sure that saying “when you get out of college, if I’m president you’ll have a job,” is more bullshit than “promising” Hope and Change. (And even you concede that Obama had a 50% success rate – “he brought the hope, forgot the change” – which would probably be higher than Romney’s utterly unfeasible campaign promise).

    Besides, I think Obama’s relatability to college students comes with the fact that he did not come from a privileged background and was able to use his college education to make him into the “wealthy politician” that you deride him as.

  3. Mark says:

    Also key to Obama’s winning of the college crowd was his promise and delivery of a reworked college loan system that did not enslave college students with ridiculous interest rates.

    I think the comment was meant to be hyperbolic. Still, it’s one thing to make broad statement about universal ideas, like hope and change, and another to specifically promise that college students will have more jobs under your watch than the the incumbent, especially when the dynamics of the myriad causes of unemployment are complex and unquantifiable.

  4. kiel says:

    “Do you have a pet, Kallie? You do? A little puppy, is it? Well, I can promise you this, if I am elected, your sweet puppy will live a long and happy life. If Obama is re-elected, your dog will be hit by a car the very next day. Do you want that to happen, Kallie? Do you?”

  5. JimC146 says:

    And even you concede that Obama had a 50% success rate

    Unfortunately, the hope has faded so actually he’s failed…I was not in his camp but I was willing to watch and see if he could deliver and he didn’t. Hope is lost as evident in the increased unrest and fear. Obama is losing the support he once had (this doesn’t mean it is going to his opposition, just lost the enthusiasm he once enjoyed). When you fail to deliver on the promises and squander the time your were given, you’re going to lose. President Present had a chance and failed…unfortunately, there’s not a clear choice for an alternative and once again we’ll be stuck in choosing between lesser of two sucks…

  6. matt says:

    I was willing to watch and see if he could deliver and he didn’t.

    you are a piece of shit liar. shall i go to the archives?

  7. nathan says:

    First of all, for the record, quantifying hope and change was sarcasm.

    Second, despite Obama’s shortcomings that can be appreciated by both the left and right, this post really has nothing to do with Obama, except for his student support. But as a side note, I think the rhetoric of Obama ‘failing’ needs to stop. We have too many examples of true presidential failures (e.g. Buchanan, Bush, etc..) for people to throw around such exaggerated condemnations just because they don’t like the other side. On top of that, republicans need to stop drooling over the wet dream of being able to be as harsh on Obama as the democrats were on Bush after he unfathomably and as of now, irrepairably, screwed over our country.

    Third, no need for personal attacks. The only people really worth holding accountable are politicians like Mitt Romney (see original post).

  8. JimC146 says:

    you are a piece of shit liar. shall i go to the archives?

    Seriously, Matt? I think you’ve been a raging librul too long. Let’s do go back to the archives shall we?

    I searched the archives, the last time I made a comment about Obama prior to this year after the “new management” took over….

    JimC – 11:25 – Congrats to Sen. Obama…I humbly accept him as my new President, history has been made. I was wrong (again) about who would win and hopefully I will be wrong about how he governs. Good night and may we have a pleasant tomorrow…

    BTW- Everyone, Matt posted this directly into the blog entry at my request because I emailed him to concede the election prediction and that I wanted to acknowledge my new President.

    Any other raging librul crazy you want to spew jackass? If you want to call me names on here fine, but if you call me a liar you need to provide the proof.

  9. JimC146 says:

    But as a side note, I think the rhetoric of Obama ‘failing’ needs to stop.

    I was referring to his failure to deliver on his campaign promises which was wrapped up in the “Hope and Change” rhetoric (which is relevant to this post, i.e. Romney’s stupid promises)…other than that he hasn’t done much to fail….

  10. Mark says:

    Jim, I also think you are seriously overestimating the power that the president has to affect change. We have 3 branches with checks and balances for a reason, and last I checked we had a majority republican congress so maybe some of your grievances should lie with them.

    I’d also like to direct your attention here -> http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/. Or if you sensitive to profanity -> http://whattheheckhasobamadonesofar.com/

  11. JimC146 says:

    We have 3 branches with checks and balances for a reason, and last I checked we had a majority republican congress so maybe some of your grievances should lie with them.

    Well Mark, you’d better take another look because of Congress there are two houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Currently, only the House of Representatives is controlled by the GOP. The Democrats are in control of the Senate…you know Harry Reid(D-NV) is Senate majority leader?

    Furthermore, from Jan 2009 to Jan 2011, the Democrats held majorities in both houses of Congress and the White House. Prior to that, under Bush, Democrats held both Houses from Jan 2007 to Jan 2009. So, not sure what your point is but those are the facts.

    The power the President has is with his agenda and his pen. He can set the agenda, speak to the people of the country to get public opinion on his side, and then threaten veto if he doesn’t get his way. Also, he has the “signing statements” (which is one of those broken campaign promises)…and those “What has Obama done for me?” items, most come with an asterisk attached to them…