The Occupation Continues

(1)

The Occupy Wall Street protest is nearing the third week mark this weekend and shows no sign of ending anytime soon. Despite the weather dropping below 50’s in Lower Manhattan this week, at least 15,000 protestors took to the streets toward Wall Street this past Wednesday night to show their resentment of economic inequality and corporate greed.

Last week, I wrote about what I saw as the contradictory nature of the protests: the organizers’ dogmatic call to arms against capitalism was diluted by their odd embrace of corporatism. I mainly noted that you had to watch a 15 second advertisement before you could watch a livestream video of the ‘revolution’. For me, that showed sloppiness on the part of the organizers, who could have easily found a website that would stream live footage while not allowing corporations to target their viewers as a hip, revolution-watching demographic.

I also found it distasteful that the organizers’ unabashedly endorsed an anti-fascist, yet highly commercialized Hollywood flick, V for Vendetta. Just because the movie has a ’fuck the system’ message, it’s still sold to you by the system. As Karl Marx once said of Capitalism:

“It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connections everywhere.”

Even though V for Vendetta symbolizes revolution, its only exists as a symbol because selling the revolution is profitable.

 

(2)

Nevertheless, I came to terms that these were rather petty concerns in the grand scheme of the Wall Street protest. Amassing a continuous stream of people who share a similar cause for nearly three weeks typically only happens for events like Mardi Gras, the Olympics, and Kim Jong-Il’s birthday; or more recently, mass unplanned political uprisings like the one in Tahrir Square. The Occupy Wall Street protest is quickly turning into the latter.

This is due in part to the way in which the New York Police Department has handled the situation. Pepper-spraying, bludgeoning, and arresting en masse have all been used by the NYPD in order to (discretely?) disperse protesters. Contrary to what the NYPD thought they were doing, these pointless clashes have mostly led to increased media exposure for the protesters. With each new news report about the protest, there is mention of income inequality, corporate greed, or some other unsavory aspect about our political and economic system.

Google Trends 10/7 Occupy Wall St and Corporate Greed

News reference volume for "Occupy Wall Street" vs. "Corporate Greed". Google Trends 10/7

The latest development this week has been the formation of similar movements in cities all across the country. Boston, DC, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia have notable ‘occupations’ situated at banks, city hall’s, and public plazas. I’m not quite sure which ones will survive, but it’s certainly apparent that this movement has gone local, to a civic space near you.

Comments

  1. JimC146 says:

    The “movement” is being co-opted by political entities, e.g. Move.org, AFL-CIO, and even DNC leadership. If there was a real movement, it is being trampled upon by political machines trying to turn the national narrative away from a sucky economy and towards a scapegoat in the guise of Big Corp(tm), Bankers, and just plain evil rich people.

    This astroturf spectacle is pathetic…

  2. matt says:

    >The “movement” is being co-opted by political entities

    political entities are attempting to co-opt. these people are telling them to fuck off.

    unlike the tea party, which welcomed being co-opted by dick armey’s group, koch brothers, etc.

  3. JimC146 says:

    >political entities are attempting to co-opt. these people are telling them to fuck off.

    The “official” OWS website seems to suggest otherwise.

    Unless you don’t consider MoveOn.org a political machine. Nor AFL-CIO who donated $28 million to the Obama campaign..

    There are more on that list…seems like they are welcoming a co-opt. Unless the people on the street don’t know what the organizers are publishing.

  4. nathan says:

    Matt’s got it right. The Tea Party would have stayed marginal from any real political clout had Dick Armey and the Koch Bros not put millions of dollars into organizing protester’s, arranging bus tours, and calling their friends at Fox News to spread the word about ‘tea bagging’. Occupy Wall Street, however, got to where they are from genuine grassroots word of mouth and political momentum. I don’t remember the Tea Party raising their political profile this quickly.
    MoveOn and the AFL-CIO might be lending support now, but that hardly qualifies as ‘co-opting’ control. Besides, even if they did, I’d sure prefer groups made up of millions of individuals exerting political will rather then a group funded by a handful of billionaires who call the shots.

  5. matt says:

    >Unless you don’t consider MoveOn.org a political machine. Nor AFL-CIO who donated $28 million to the Obama campaign

    more false equivalency nonsense and misdirection flim flam.

    moveon acts on the will of their members, because if at any time they didn’t, they wouldn’t have any members left. the afl-cio represents people whose interests are in line with the protesters. the average tea bagger is too ignorant to know it, but he/she has more in common with me than with dick army or the kochs.

    and who gives a fuck if the afl-cio gave their money to obama? how could that have any less to do with the situation at hand?

  6. JimC146 says:

    Not sure why the Tea Party has anything do with this either. The OWS movement, on its own has my respect and I agree with the sentiment, perhaps not with what I believe their solutions would be, nor necessarily the cause.

    So our perceptions of the situation are quite different which doesn’t surprise me. You have your boogeymen on the right (Foxnews, Dick Army, Kochs. etc.) and I have my boogeymen on the left (MoveOn.org, George Soros, Big Unions, etc.). Obviously we’re not going to agree on the distinctions of their roles in influencing public perceptions.

    All I know is that, in my opinion, this OWS movement, no matter how it started, is now tainted by the inclusion of Big Political machines who have ironically, Big Money backers of which the very things the OWS was to be against, as Nathan pointed out before.

    I just find it all very typical and not surprising at all that a simple idea got mucked up so quick…but so what. Its gonna get cold soon and they will retreat to tweeting on their iPads hooked up to broadband internet supplied by big corp and built upon more big corp switches and servers, sipping Starbucks coffee….obla di obla da…

  7. matt says:

    >Not sure why the Tea Party has anything do with this either.

    really? populist-leaning movements, fed up with those in power? ring a bell?

    >So our perceptions of the situation are quite different

    that’s not it. you’re just wrong. there is no left wing fox news, much as you would like to compare everything on the left to it. soros has fuck-all to do with OWS. move on and the unions are, ONCE AGAIN, run largely by their members and those who have common cause with OWS. dick armey and the kochs SUCCESSFULLY CO-OPTED the tea baggers. it’s done, they literally have them (YOU) arguing at full volume for polices that fuck them (YOU) over. it’s just a fact, not open for debate.

    anyone can give money, pledge money, bring food to OWS, but there hasn’t even been time or mechanism for anyone to co-opt them. so at the very most generous i can be to your patently false equivalencies (soros, moveon, unions) and juvenile attempts at misdirection (bringing obama into it) , you’re weeks if not months early in making your assessment.

    their message, unfiltered, as of 24 hours ago:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N8o3peQq79Q

    but let’s say you’re right. what would co-opting of OWS by moveon and unions look like? THEY ALREADY AGREE ON EVERYTHING THAT MATTERS. banksters, bailouts, outsourcing, forclosure fraud, healthcare, endless losing wars, and on and on.

    so agin, we’re back to you just flinging bullshit up against the wall of nathan’s site.

  8. JimC146 says:

    >but let’s say you’re right. what would co-opting of OWS by moveon and unions look like? THEY ALREADY AGREE ON EVERYTHING THAT MATTERS. banksters, bailouts, outsourcing, forclosure fraud, healthcare, endless losing wars, and on and on.

    You know what, you’re exactly right. You said it all. Have a good night Mr. C.