The Retarded Rush Limbaugh Exception

by sarabeth at 5:59 am on February 8th, 2010 in Lipstick on a Pig, Podium Spin

Sarah P. teaches this to her children (and you teach it to your children and grandchildren, too, don’t you, dear reader?): “Name calling by anyone is just unnecessary.” And retard is a very bad name for one of Sarah P.’s key political props God’s own children, so Sarah Pee can take deep umbrage if someone calls someone else a “f’ing retard”. But apparently the rules for when “f’ing retard” constitutes objectionable name calling are even more complex, and less easily understood, than the infield fly rule.

According to Sarah P., using the word “retard” is derogatory to developmentally challenged children only if it’s applied to people one does not agree with:

This morning on Fox News, host Chris Wallace asked Sarah Palin about her public call for White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel to resign after reports surfaced that he called a group of liberal activists “f—ing retarded.” Palin reiterated her call for Emanuel to “step down” and explained that while she’s not “politically correct” or “one to be a word police,” she was committed to “reaching out and to helping the special needs community.” But when Wallace asked Palin about Rush Limbaugh’s endorsement of the language, Palin said she was fine with Limbaugh’s satirical comments. “I didn’t hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with ‘f-ing retards,’” she said. “There is a big difference there”:
PALIN: I agree with Rush Limbaugh. He was using satire to politically correct —

WALLACE: He used the “r” word.

PALIN: He used satire. Name-calling by anyone, I teach this to my children and you teach it to your children and grandchildren, too. Name calling by anyone is just unnecessary. It just wastes time. Let’s speak to the issues and — [...]

PALIN: I didn’t hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with ‘f-ing retards’ and we did know that Rahm Emanuel has been reported, did say that. there is a big difference there. Again, name-calling, using language that is insensitive, by anyone, male, female, Republican, Democrat, is unnecessary. It’s inappropriate. Let’s all just grow up.

So, as best as anyone can tell from this developmentally challenged lady’s statement, even Sarah P. would not take any objection to the following statement: “Who does this dumb-shit lady think we are, effing retards?” (Cliff’s Notes adds this helpful gloss: note that the term, which would be objectionable if applied to those one disagrees with, is being applied to oneself and one’s cohorts. Hence, unexceptionable. Also, being used in the context of political satire. Hence, doubly unexceptionable.)

Comments

  1. billancourt wrote:

    did you happen to notice the grimace and eye roll that wallace did at the end of the interview when he thought he was off camera, that says it all. fox is all about making money by firing up morons that can’t form their own opinions. as long as palin serves a purpose, fox will allow her to repeat rehearsed answers (or try to), to their short list of agenda based questions. i have however thought of some nifty pifty names for sarah’s next gandchild : dogmeat, rattrap, and if it’s a boy white trash. it’s really a dichotomy, having palin making a douchebag of herself, the klu, i mean the tea party movement, and the fox news version of conservatives is a great help to the opposition. the bad part of the equation is that we have to hear her shrill nasal version of trying to speak english all over the airwaves. the greatest chance for America, in some ways is Sarah Palin. The more she makes the right (even the majority who don’t desrve it), look like morons, the more time the current administration has to try and get things done. we’ve already tried the dumbfuck president idea and it never really worked out well. please just take your money and go sarah you embarrass America.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*