The Bastion Of Non-Partisan Healthcare Research

(1)
When Republicans who fervently oppose healthcare reform — because if it passes in anywhere near the form that most Democrats are fighting for, grateful Americans will turn even more solidly pro-Democrat and anti-Republican than they already are, and probably for a good long time — are trying to rationalize their opposition, and pretend it’s based on the merits of the healthcare reform proposals currently under consideration rather than pure electoral panic, they are fond of citing the Lewin Group. There was an excellent segment about this on The Rachel Maddow Show last night.

The Lewin Group is invariably represented by Republicans as a nonpartisan group of healthcare experts. The Washington Posts‘s David S. Hilzenrath spilled the beans, though last week.

The political battle over health-care reform is waged largely with numbers, and few number-crunchers have shaped the debate as much as the Lewin Group, a consulting firm whose research has been widely cited by opponents of a public insurance option.

To Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House Republican whip, it is “the nonpartisan Lewin Group.” To Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee, it is an “independent research firm.” To Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the second-ranking Republican on the pivotal Finance Committee, it is “well known as one of the most nonpartisan groups in the country.”

But this is just a bald-faced lie, what will presumably — given how often Republicans resort to it — come to be known in a few years as a Republicanism. The truth of the matter is that, since 2007, the Lewin Group has been 100% owned by United Healthcare, which just happens to be the largest for-profit insurance company in the U.S.

Generally left unsaid amid all the citations is that the Lewin Group is wholly owned by UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation’s largest insurers.

More specifically, the Lewin Group is part of Ingenix, a UnitedHealth subsidiary…

Well known to be one of the most nonpartisan groups in the country, indeed!

But that’s not all. It may not even be the worst part. This bastion of disinterested healthcare research, which commands the respect of the entire Republican high command, to which said high command looks for healthcare industry number-crunching, is also sullied by the odor of a criminal scandal. Which, strangely enough, had to do with … you’ll never guess … criminally dishonest healthcare industry number-crunching.

… Ingenix, a UnitedHealth subsidiary … was accused by the New York attorney general and the American Medical Association, a physician’s group, of helping insurers shift medical expenses to consumers by distributing skewed data. Ingenix supplied its parent company and other insurers with data that allegedly understated the “usual and customary” doctor fees that insurers use to determine how much they will reimburse consumers for out-of-network care.

In January, UnitedHealth agreed to a $50 million settlement with the New York attorney general and a $350 million settlement with the AMA, covering conduct going back as far as 1994.

Ingenix chief executive Andrew Slavitt said the Ingenix data was never biased, but Ingenix nonetheless agreed to exit that particular line of business.

How telling is it that when Republicans are searching for an authoritative source they can cite when they want to adduce numbers to rationalize resistance to healthcare reform proposals, the best they can do is the Lewin Group, which is part of a company known to have been cooking up healthcare industry numbers for at least 15 years?

They certainly know how to pick ‘em, that’s for sure.

(2)
The Washington Post article quoted above appeared on July 22. The Washington Post is a widely read, widely respected newspaper, whose articles have both reach and impact.

So you’re probably thinking that the pimping of The Lewin Group’s healthcare research by Republicans would have ceased shortly after the story appeared. You’re probably thinking that our ever vigilant media would have stopped facilitating the pimping of The Lewin Group’s healthcare research. And you would, of course, be totally wrong. Because we are the United States of America. With the finest healthcare system in the world (even Rush Bimbaugh said so). And the finest newsmedia, to boot.

So here’s what went down when Republican Representative Tom Price (of Georgia, to give shame where shame is due) appeared on MSNBC‘s Morning Joe on July 24:

PRICE: … In fact, The Lewin Group did a study that demonstrated clearly that more than a hundred million Americans — a hundred million Americans! — will be moved –

BARNICLE: What’s the Lewin Group?

PRICE: It’s a study group. it’s a nonpartisan private study group that looks at public policy issues.

BARNICLE: Who funds them?

PRICE: Who funds them? I think they are a foundation. what they have shown is over 100 million Americans will be forced from private personal insurance to the government-run program. That ought to give pause to everybody. And that’s why we believe we ought to sit down in a bipartisan way and come up with the positive solutions available to us.

You might get the impression that Mike Barnicle isn’t much of a journalist. You might be right. He used to be a columnist for The Boston Globe. That was before he resigned in disgrace ten years ago amid allegations of plagiarism and fabrication. But neither plagiarism nor fabrication nor incompetence comes in the way of MSNBC providing him gainful employment with painful regularity.

Comments

  1. April J.not a righty says:

    Isn’t it appaling that the Republicans will side with the insurance industry over the American people and the sheep that follow them don’t realize it? How can they think for one minute that Cantor or McConnel will speak up for them? I guess it takes millions in campaign contributions for them to stick up for you.

  2. matt says:

    the problem right now is democrats who take money from the insurers, and a president who would rather lead a cult than a country, not republicans.

  3. April J.not a righty says:

    I disagree. They had eight years to make a difference and they didn’t for all the talk about being the party of “Christ” they sure didn’t live up to his teachings when they were in power. It shows the hypocrisy. The insurance industry says if there were laws to force them to cover those with pre-existing conditions, they’d do it. Why does it require a law? It isn’t Obama that is forcing the health insurance reform because he just wants to grow government, it is the industry itself forcing the government to do what is necessary for the American people.

  4. sarabeth says:

    where does it say that because Republicans screwed things up for the last 8 years, Obama/Democrats can’t be screwing things up now?

  5. matt says:

    They had eight years to make a difference

    health care reform isn’t their issue, it is democrats’ issue. how can you blame republicans for not championing democrats’ issues?

    democrats generally, and obama specifically ran on the slogan “give us control of the congress and white house and we’ll give you investigations (all dems but obama), health care and and end to endless wars.” they got the wh and both houses of congress, and then finally a filibuster-proof majority in the senate. how can you blame republicans for blocking anything when they don’t have the power to block anything unless dems grant it to them?

    the industry is made up of public companies whose only real responsibility (under current law) is a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders. covering sicker people and lowering their rates violates their responsibility to their shareholders, and would be a big problem for their management.

    there do need to be changes to the law to add social responsibility to fiduciary responsibility, because as it stands now, insurance companies are doing exactly what is required of them, adding value for their shareholders.

    this is a disgusting set of incentives, but that’s our system, and that’s why there needs to be changes.

  6. April J not a righty says:

    What about ethics? Is it ethically correct to take premiums for decades to kick people off the rolls when they get sick? They don’t want it changed but they can screw with people’s lives? And not true the Republicans didn’t “want” health reform. Bush ran on that “promise” in 2004 and pushed for the ability to buy into groups much like co-ops. The responsibility is to the American people not a political party. We are the employer, they are the employee, it is time we actually benefited from something for once.

  7. matt says:

    >Bush ran on that “promise” in 2004 and pushed for the ability to buy into groups much like co-ops.

    dunno if you noticed, but bush isn’t in office nor is he in congress.

  8. Zurie says:

    If you would have the ability to go back and read what YOU wrote, you would see that you said:

    health care reform isn’t their issue, it is democrats’ issue. how can you blame republicans for not championing democrats’ issues?

    The Republicans DID champion the issue, BUSH DID run for healthcare reform so your statement is false!

  9. matt says:

    you morons can keep circle jerking yourselves for as long as you want. it will never make what you’re saying substantially true.

    bush ran on tax cuts, privatization, “honor & dignity”, and “values” more or less in that order. he surely mentioned health care once in a while, but he certainly didn’t run on it.

  10. April J not a righty says:

    Wow so much anger. I would wonder if you consider yourself a “Christian” as most righties do, would Christ approve of the notion that only those who can afford it should go to the doctor? “honor and dignity” huh, well a lot has come out to show that his talk was cheap and really they were a bunch of hypocrites. I bet God didn’t tell him to do most of the stuff he did or allowed to happen on his watch. Sounds like you are bitter and only selfish, greedy jerks really think profit should trump people. The American people spoke and they were tired of the policies of the neocons, they knew health care reform was on the top of Obama’s agenda, and the middle class is tired of being stepped on. When 50% of bankruptcies in the U.S. are due to medical costs, especially when most people are covered by insurance, there is a problem. Maybe you have never had a catastrophic medical illness affect you that cost thousands of dollars, maybe you are one of the angry wealthy who think you should be able to amass large quantities of money not realizing that no man is an island and you get what you have because of someone else. I hope your God doesn’t teach you a lesson in humility and the way we are supposed to treat humanity.

  11. matt says:

    jesus fuck.

    how on earth would anyone with two working brain cells ever think that i’m a “rightie”? is everyone who disagrees with obama a “rightie”?

    The American people spoke and they were tired of the policies of the neocons, they knew health care reform was on the top of Obama’s agenda, and the middle class is tired of being stepped on.

    and i wonder if they can feel all that change rushing at them…

    i’m FOR reform, moron. the kind of reform that was promised by obama when he was asking for democratic votes. the kind he’s racing away from to appease republicans even though he has no reason to except maintaining his aura of bipartisanship.

    and don’t post with different names again. you’re not fooling anyone, and we don’t allow it anyway. how would you think using the same email address and the same IP would go unnoticed?

  12. sarabeth says:

    For the record, in case anyone would be wondering, “April J not a righty” and “Zurie” would be one and the same person.

  13. April J not a righty says:

    No it was me both times as I use that other handle often, i was not trying to represent it as being someone else either.