Taking Responsibility
by sarabeth at 6:02 am on February 4th, 2009 in Corruption, Obama Uber AllesAfter Daschle’s surprise withdrawal yesterday, President Obama is receiving widespread applause for promptly taking responsibility, and acknowledging that he screwed up. What is being celebrated is the enormous contrast to the previous incumbent of the Oval Office. A contrast that Obama himself carefully underscored:
I’m here on television saying I screwed up, and that’s part of the era of responsibility. It’s not never making mistakes; it’s owning up to them and trying to make sure you never repeat them and that’s what we intend to do.
But there’s really taking responsibility, and there’s cheaply adopting the public posture of taking responsibility.
Obama made I-screwed-up noises on all five TV interviews he gave yesterday afternoon. Very similar noises each time, which we can be sure were very carefully scripted. In no particular order:
…but, uh, it’s frustrating for me and it’s something that I take responsibility for. … He didn’t offer excuses and I don’t think there is an excuse and what became apparent was that not only could this be a distraction, but I don’t want my administration to be sending a message that there are two sets of rules: one for prominent people and one for ordinary folks who have to pay their taxes everyday. I think that we’re going to move forward, learn from our mistakes. I will learn from mine…
But as he acknowledged, this was a mistake. I don’t think it was intentional on his part but it was a serious mistake. He owned up to it and ultimately made a decision that we couldn’t afford the distraction, and I’ve got to own up to my mistake which is that, ultimately, it’s important for this administration to send a message that there aren’t two sets of rules — you know, one for prominent people and one for ordinary folks who have to pay their taxes.
OBAMA: Yes. I think I made a mistake. And I told Tom that. I take responsibility for the appointees and…
COOPER: What was your mistake, letting it get this far? You should have pulled it earlier?
OBAMA: Well, I think my mistake is not in selecting Tom originally, because I think nobody was better equipped to deal both with the substance and policy of health care. He understands it as well as anybody, but also the politics, which is going to be required to actually get it done.
But I think that, look, ultimately, I campaigned on changing Washington and bottom-up politics. And I don’t want to send a message to the American people that there are two sets of standards, one for powerful people, and one for ordinary folks who are working every day and paying their taxes.
CHARLES GIBSON: You’ve now got three major appointees who, it turns out, haven’t paid all their taxes. What kind of a message does that send about responsibility?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, I think it sends the wrong one. And that’s, you know, something I take responsibility for.
I think that all of these were honest mistakes, but ultimately there’s no excuse for them. And, you know, I think that Tom, as well as myself, understood that. I think he made the assessment that it was going to be too much of a distraction. And the most important thing, from my perspective, is making sure that the American people understand we don’t have two sets of rules here, that everybody has responsibilities. In this situation, I take responsibility for it.
…I think that Tom took responsibility for the mistake on his taxes. I think it was an honest mistake, and I made the assessment. I made the judgment that he was the best person to achieve health-care reform and bring people together.
But what became clear to me is that we can’t send a message to the American people that we’ve got two sets of rules: one for prominent people and one for ordinary people. And, you know, so I consider this a mistake on my part and one that I intend to fix and correct and make sure that we’re not screwing up again.
Now here’s the thing: there’s still this white elephant in the room, the successful nomination of Tim Geithner. There is no way the criticism Obama is directing at himself over Daschle’s nomination doesn’t apply to Geithner’s nomination too. Geithner too benefited from the second set of rules, the one for prominent/powerful people. Obama’s mea culpa can hardly be judged to be genuine till he addresses why it was okay to push Geithner’s nomination if it isn’t okay to have pushed Daschle’s.
If Obama really meant what he’s saying, he would (with very deep regret, no doubt) have to ask Geithner for his resignation.
Until he does, Obama is just a very smooth and savvy hypocrite.
Previously:
Geithner’s Tax Explanation Just Doesn’t Wash
Geithner: I Just Don’t Get it
Any Day Now
Here We Go Again
What’s A little Tax Evasion Between Friends?
The NYT’s Call For Daschle To Withdraw
Subsequently:
Smooth And Savvy Hypocrisy (Contd.)
Frost wrote:
Obama won’t be the only one paying this price.. The American people will.. He was and is the right man for the job.. you don’t see any others even trying to step up to the plate..
perhaps that should be Daschle punishment.. make him get us out of this mess..
As for Obama.. he is still a breath of fresh air..
There are thousands of crooks out there working. Alram companies hire ex cons to install your house alarms.. Computer companys hire hackers.
this is tax problems.. god knows we’ve all fear the IRS
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 8:13 am ¶
matt wrote:
is he now? because he’s finding new ways to fuck up?
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 8:19 am ¶
uraspudboy2 wrote:
new ways? …compared to bush’s ways?.the good ole boy system .. How is Obama going to know these people made mistakes on their taxes? At least he is finding out and they could have come clean before accepting the role…they are have paid their fair share with interest for their mistakes lawfully…….
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 8:51 am ¶
Clark wrote:
On Monday both Congress and President Obama were saying that Daschle made a mistake and was taking care of it … and that the tax mistake was ok and wouldn’t affect his ability to perform his cabinet responsibilities.
On Tuesday Daschle pulls out …. this is probably two fold …. President Obama suddenly realized the public was going to support him supporting Daschle and there were probably more “tax mistakes” lurking that neither the President nor Daschle wanted exposed.
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 9:04 am ¶
sarabeth wrote:
Re #3, if you care to read the post, no one is saying that Obama should have known about their tax problems in advance.
I am saying something about what Obama should do at this point if he really means what he’s now saying.
Care to comment on what I’m actually saying?
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 9:07 am ¶
martha ferrero wrote:
Isn’t this the case as well for Timothy Geithner? Geithner also failed to pay his taxes for a couple of years and he now heads the Treasury which includes the IRS. Strange.
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 10:47 am ¶
sarabeth wrote:
That’s precisely my point in the post; did you read all the way to the end?
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 11:49 am ¶
carlleigh wrote:
It would be nice if people like Daschle would self select and stay away from politics and Washington/City Hall.
Obama didn’t need to apologize for his selection. He does need to get rid of the tax cheats as soon as their status is known. Timothy Geithner anyone? Hello are you out there?
Clinton types of teary apology means nothing? Or does it?
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 3:27 pm ¶
carlleigh wrote:
It would be nice if people like Daschle would self select and stay away from politics and Washington/City Hall. Obama didn’t need to apologize for his selection. He does need to get rid of the tax cheats as soon as their status is known. Timothy Geithner anyone? Hello are you out there?
Clinton types of teary apology means nothing? Or does it?
Posted 04 Feb 2009 at 3:28 pm ¶