Caroline Kennedy: The Uncertainties Of The Withdrawal Method
by sarabeth at 6:04 am on January 22nd, 2009 in Democrats, General, MediaFirst, the New York Post reported that Caroline Kennedy had withdrawn her bid to be appointed to Hillary Clinton’s vacant Senate seat. I didn’t read the original story, and at this point it has been updated, so it’s not clear what the original version was. Specifically, it’s not clear who they sourced the story to.
Then, the New York Times confirmed the story. Once again, the story has clearly been updated (although there is no acknowledgment to this effect), so it’s hard to say who they sourced the story to.
At some point, AP got into the act, first reporting that Kennedy had withdrawn, then that she hadn’t and then that she had. An AP news alert, time stamped 10:38 p.m. ET, said:
Source: Caroline Kennedy remains in contest to fill Hillary Clinton’s NY Senate seat. (Corrects APNewsAlert with source saying Kennedy had withdrawn.)
but now, like everyone else, they’re saying:
Caroline Kennedy withdrew from consideration for the U.S. Senate seat once held by her slain uncle, Bobby Kennedy, after a night of turmoil and uncertainty over her intentions.
It’s far from clear what actually happened. The New York Post and New York Times offer diametrically opposed explanations.
The Post offers the headline:
MAKES DECISION AFTER LEARNING SHE WASN’T GOING TO BE PICKED AS SENATOR
and goes on to say:
Sources close to Kennedy said she had decided to bow out for “personal” reasons.
But others said she made her move after it became clear Paterson wasn’t going to pick her for the seat.
Several sources said the governor, who has sole power to replace Clinton, was unimpressed with the daughter of John F. Kennedy in media interviews and in private sessions with various officials.
Two sources said Paterson had conveyed to Kennedy on Tuesday that she wasn’t likely to get picked.
Ms. Kennedy on Wednesday called Gov. David A. Paterson, who will choose a successor to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, to inform him that she was no longer interested.
[...]
Ms. Kennedy did not elaborate, but a person who spoke to her suggested that her concerns about the health of her uncle, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who suffers from brain cancer and was hospitalized after a seizure on Tuesday, contributed to her decision.Ms. Kennedy believed that the job was hers if she would accept it, the person said, but aides to Mr. Paterson would not comment on whether that was true.
Her decision appeared to catch the governor off guard, throwing the Paterson administration into confusion and setting off conflicting news media reports.
For what it’s worth, AP notes both explanations but sides with the Times.
(The last excerpt from the Times was edited at 7:27 am, to restore a paragraph that was inadvertently deleted originally.)
Kathleen Gardner wrote:
I think everyone has forgotten WHO SHE is and Who she lost!!! Yes, Caroline is private. Yes as we would be in her stead. I am sure she had nightmares of her early life. Who wouldn’t. LOOK IN HER EYES! THEY ARE HER FATHER’S JOHN F. KENNEDY’S! HEAR AND LISTEN TO HER WORDS. THEY ARE HIS. I THINK SHE IS THE CHANGE NEEDED, I THINK WE AS A COUNTRY NEED HER, I KNOW THE COUNTRY IS NOW READY FOR HER! I TRULY THINK SHE WILL BE THE VERY FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT. FOR IT IS MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE’S. FOR SHE KNEW HER FATHER AND SHARED HIS VIEWS. SHE WALKS IN HIS FOOTSTEPS. MAYBE UNSURE. NEVER AFRAID FOR HIS SPIRIT IS RIGHT BESIDE HER!!! JUDGE NOT BY OTHERS BUT BY HER ACTION AND HER MERITS!!! WE ALL STILL FEEL HER LOSE AND WE FEEL IT VERY DEEP. IF SHE SEEMS UNCERTAIN IT IS HER BIRTH COUNTRY MADE HER FEEL THAT WAY!! LET US NOW SHOW HER WE ARE THERE FOR HER . WHEN SHE ASKS AS HER LATE FATHER DID ” NOT ASK WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU. BUT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY” LET US STAND WITH HER AND SUPPORT HER THE WAY WE DID WHEN HER FATHER ASKED THE SAME!!!
Posted 22 Jan 2009 at 9:08 am ¶
sarabeth wrote:
I’m really curious. What in my post provoked this all-caps tripe?
Posted 22 Jan 2009 at 9:17 am ¶
David wrote:
I have a great deal of respect for Caroline Kennedy and for what she has done with her life, but her experiences do not neccesarily mean that she is the best candidate for Senator from New York. Undoubtedly, her family encouraged her to seek this position. Perhaps it was based on the family’s tradition of public service.
I am so disgusted with the “unnamed sources” and persons “not authorized to comment” that infect ALL areas of the news. And I am disgusted with the news media itself. WHY should it be such a big story because Caroline Kennedy decided to withdraw from consideration?
The way I see it, she was pushed into seeking the appointment and decided it wasn’t worth the gossip, the nasty comments, the rumors and the embarrassment of not being selected.
I wish they would leave the woman alone.
Posted 23 Jan 2009 at 6:52 am ¶