Small Business Fetish

I have no idea why no one else ever fact checks this garbage, but I always will:

BIDEN: Well Gwen, where I come from, it’s called fairness, just simple fairness. The middle class is struggling. The middle class under John McCain’s tax proposal, 100 million families, middle class families, households to be precise, they got not a single change, they got not a single break in taxes. No one making less than $250,000 under Barack Obama’s plan will see one single penny of their tax raised whether it’s their capital gains tax, their income tax, investment tax, any tax. And 95 percent of the people in the United States of America making less than $150,000 will get a tax break.

Now, that seems to me to be simple fairness. The economic engine of America is middle class. It’s the people listening to this broadcast. When you do well, America does well. Even the wealthy do well. This is not punitive. John wants to add $300 million, billion in new tax cuts per year for corporate America and the very wealthy while giving virtually nothing to the middle class. We have a different value set. The middle class is the economic engine. It’s fair. They deserve the tax breaks, not the super wealthy who are doing pretty well. They don’t need any more tax breaks. And by the way, they’ll pay no more than they did under Ronald Reagan.

IFILL: Governor?

PALIN: I do take issue with some of the principle there with that redistribution of wealth principle that seems to be espoused by you. But when you talk about Barack’s plan to tax increase affecting only those making $250,000 a year or more, you’re forgetting millions of small businesses that are going to fit into that category. So they’re going to be the ones paying higher taxes thus resulting in fewer jobs being created and less productivity.

This simply isn’t true, and since it is the key to Republican class warfare, it can’t go unchecked. Companies, small or otherwise, are taxed after expenses, not before. When you raise taxes on people earning $250,000, you’re not jamming up the guy who owns the local tavern. Because even if his business produces, say, $500,000 in annual revenue, he deducts his labor costs, (bartenders, cleaners, security) his cost of goods sold, (beer, wine, liquor, food) utilities, rent, advertising, office supplies, etc. So yeah, the business brings in a lot of money, but if the owner only clears $75,000/year, he isn’t taxed as if he were rich. Small business or not, income is income. Lumping him in with Wall Street executives who make half million dollar salaries is disingenuous, and claiming that he will create less jobs because rich people might pay a bit more in taxes is just a lie.

Comments

  1. kiel says:

    Precisely, And to be honest, the only “jobs” the rich people I know create are jobs for illegal aliens (gardeners, mainly) and under-the-table, cash-only jobs (nannies, often also illegals). So one would think that anti-immigration McLame (note: new nickname) would be all for eliminating a few of these “jobs,” creating a few less incentives for illegals to come over.

    (Only half-faceteous here…)

  2. matt says:

    >McLame (note: new nickname)

    not going to cut it either, sorry.

  3. sarabeth says:

    Adding to Matt’s point, it’s like I said this morning: the McCain-Palin campaign only attacks Obama with lies that have already been proven to be lies.

    In June, after the McCain campaign started using the line that more than 20 million small businesses who file their income tax as individuals would see their taxes raised under Obama’s plan (Carleton S. Fiorina said 23 million, McCain said 21.6 million), Media Matters pointed out that:

    … according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center’s table of 2007 tax returns that reported small-business income, only 481,000 of those returns are in the top two income-tax brackets — which include all filers with taxable incomes of more than $250,000 — not 21.6 million.

    So the well-tutored Baby Sarah should certainly have known that there aren’t millions of small businesses that are going to fit into that category of making $250,000 a year or more.

  4. vineeta says:

    Sarah Palin claims to be a former business owner. Surely she knows how small businesses are taxed?

  5. sac says:

    Biden half-way rebuked her when he said 95% of business owners make under 250k.

  6. kiel says:

    McBrain-less?
    McBush?
    McShrub?
    O’l Man McMansion?

  7. matt says:

    john mccain.

  8. sarabeth says:

    at this point, just the name mccain is enough of an insult, actually. he’s thoroughly besmirched the family honor, hasn’t he?

  9. kiel says:

    Does it have to be lower-case?

  10. sarabeth says:

    that’s not a sincere question if you start it with a capital D

  11. jack says:

    Half of all “small” businesses will be impacted by the $250,000 taxation method Obama suggests. I have started, sold, closed multiple businesses in my life and in every case I will consider reducing expenses to increase or maintain profits. Taxes are an expense. I have laid off employees in order to maintain profit levels. Usually it is the minimum wage, unskilled employees that take the hit. At other times it may be high priced executive overhead. Sometimes, a blend. Increased taxes on business costs jobs. Just a fact of “small” business.

  12. sarabeth says:

    Pardon me if I trust the Tax Policy Center’s analysis rather than your gut feel.

    Half of all small businesses, indeed!