VP Debate Live Blogging

by matt at 7:30 am on October 2nd, 2008 in 2008 Presidential, Lipstick on a Pig

Reprising his performance from last week’s Presidential debate, Tom is going to be back here tonight at 9pm EDT / 6pm PDT live-blogging the VP debate. I imagine he’ll have a bit more material to work with this time.

Comments

  1. sarabeth wrote:

    Apparently, she doesn’t come across as laughably pathetic in debates as she does in interviews, so it may not be quite the massacre people think it will be.

    Will it be the Tom & Jamie show again?

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 7:44 am

  2. matt wrote:

    her prior debates were all in alaska, i don’t think you can use them to project future performance.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 8:09 am

  3. sarabeth wrote:

    insulting the great state of alaska, are you now?

    besides, she’ll stand there with her arms abimbo (I modestly take a bow for that coinage) and charm half of America

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 8:46 am

  4. matt wrote:

    that was kind of insulting. i take it back because a couple friends were in alaska this summer and report that palin is not especially loved there. i meant that the issues will be different, and the audience a touch less likely to accept folksy vapidness.

    abimbo indeed.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 8:58 am

  5. sarabeth wrote:

    “the audience a touch less likely to accept folksy vapidness”?

    really? the American voting public? the ones who “elected” and “re-elected” Bush?

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 9:08 am

  6. matt wrote:

    i notice that my writing is much less precise than normal today. i’m going to predict a bloodbath and go silent.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 9:11 am

  7. sarabeth wrote:

    I’m hoping for a bloodbath too. In my fantasy, it’s such a bloodbath that McCain goes apoplectic and has a minor stroke (or even a very public temper tantrum full of what the British quaintly call unparliamentary language).

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 9:31 am

  8. jamie beth wrote:

    i heard that she does better in debates because you can be on offense rather than defense in debates….that is to say, she can lash out at obama rather than defending mc cain, or herself and therefore she can come across as not so stupid.

    i guess what i’m saying is, i’m worried. if biden blabbers too much and is “mean” to her, or perceived that way we could all be in trouble.

    yes, i will be commenting, though i wish we could blog side by side….

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 3:23 pm

  9. doug_jr@bellsouth.ne wrote:

    She’s looking straight at the camera the whole time hoping she will come off as speaking directly to the people and right on the level of the people.

    And all of her comments are directed to the lower middle class and middle class.

    The BBC pointed this out saying that they have to go for those moms who shop at Wal Mart … they are so transparent.

    She’s not answering anything with specifics. She memorized the hell out of her pre study material.
    She’s speaking really fast because she has to get it out before she forgets it.

    but true….it’s not the massacre people were expecting…she’s holding her own.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 6:14 pm

  10. matt wrote:

    >it’s not the massacre people were expecting

    she can only memorize so much. but she is holding her own. nullus.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 6:19 pm

  11. Flan wrote:

    I am wondering if she is writing down information she is being fed through an ear piece.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 6:23 pm

  12. Stephanie wrote:

    I had the same thought! She sounds soooo scripted.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 6:26 pm

  13. matt wrote:

    we’re over here now. join us.

    Posted 02 Oct 2008 at 6:29 pm

«
»