Lying And Cheating Go Hand In Hand, Don’t They?

Sarah Palin is not just a world-class liar; the Washington Post reports that she’s also quite a cheater when she wants to be:

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has billed taxpayers for 312 nights spent in her own home during her first 19 months in office, charging a “per diem” allowance intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while traveling on state business.
[...]
Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official “duty station” is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.
[...]
During her speech at the Republican National Convention last week, Palin cast herself as a crusader for fiscal rectitude as Alaska’s governor. She noted that she sold a state-owned plane used by the former governor. “While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor’s office that I didn’t believe our citizens should have to pay for,” she said to loud applause.

Speaking from Palin’s Anchorage office, (gubernatorial spokeswoman Sharon Leighow) said Palin dealt with the plane and also trimmed other expenses, including forgoing a chef in the governor’s mansion because she preferred to cook for her family.
[...]
She wrote some form of “Lodging — own residence” or “Lodging — Wasilla residence” more than 30 times at the same time she took a per diem, according to the reports. In two dozen undated amendments to the reports, the governor deleted the reference to staying in her home but still charged the per diem.

Incidentally, 312 nights in 19 months is an awful lot, more than 50%. The reason why Palin spent so much time in her hometown in Wasilla, 600 miles away from Juneau, is that she prefers to live there rather than in Juneau even when the legislature is in session:

Palin moved her family to the capital during the legislative session last year, but prefers to stay in Wasilla and drive 45 miles to Anchorage to a state office building where she conducts most of her business, aides have said.

So, although her official duty station is Juneau, she lives and works from Wasilla out of choice, and collects a handsome per diem into the bargain. That doesn’t quite pass the rectitude smell test, does it?

It’ll be fun to watch the McCain campaign spin this one. No doubt Tucker Bounds can do a lot better than Sharon Leighow.

***Update, 5:21 pm on September 10***

From the Anchorage Daily News:

Palin doesn’t require her cabinet members to live in Juneau, and most don’t. A check of records on Tuesday found at least one has charged the state for per diem while staying in his hometown.

It’s that old glass-half-full thing. Sounds like most of Palin’s cabinet stays at home but doesn’t charge the state for per diem.

And then there’s this: the per diem queen who collects per diem for staying at her own house was strongly critical of state legislators collecting a per diem for a special session of the state legislature in Anchorage last summer, including those who do not even live in Anchorage.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin charged taxpayers a per diem for her meals and incidental expenses as governor but was a vocal critic of a similar perk for state legislators.

The Washington Post reported yesterday that, during the first half of 2007, Palin billed the state a “per diem” allowance while she was working from her Wasilla, Alaska, home and away from the state capital in Juneau. She later amended her expense reports so they no longer included the phrase “Lodging — Own Residence,” but still kept the alloted money.

Yet when it came to a historic special session of the state legislature in Anchorage this summer, Palin sharply questioned granting per diems to law makers who traveled to it from distant parts of the state.

The Anchorage Daily News reported that, in July, Palin spoke out against costs associated with the seven-hour special session 600 miles from Juneau held June 26. Each legislator was granted a per diem of between $208 and $278 to be used on meals and hotels during the session. Anchorage sits just south of Wasilla.

That price tag, the paper reported, struck Palin as too high.

“That makes absolutely no sense, that a seven-hour meeting costs our Legislature over $100,000,” Palin said. “What the heck were they charging the state for then?”

Good question, lady! I think they were charging the state for board and lodging while required to travel on state business away from home. Your turn now. What the heck were you charging the state for?

Comments

  1. Kristina says:

    Seriously I drive almost three hours round trip back and forth to work because I choose to live in the hometown that I love…why should Palin be any different. I dont think it discredits anything that she says. Come on now, if we cant find something better than this perhaps we should not say anything at all

  2. Meaux says:

    My favorite way Sarah Palin chose to save her taxpayers money: Wasilla rape victims were charged for their own rape kits, upon visiting the hospital.
    Nothing like a $1200.00 hospital bill to prohibit you from reporting an assault…

  3. Rick Aeria says:

    You are getting pretty desperate to spew your half-truths and slandering a great American woman!

    Fortunately, the majority of Americans can see through your deceptions and lies.

  4. don belgard says:

    No one can argue Palin’s popularity in Alaska. We could however argue her fiscal responsability. While selling the governors jet was probably a good idea-the fact remains that a jet that was valued at 2.6 million was sold for 2.1 million. A loss of 1/2 a million dollars. And that while she did kill the brdge to nowhere project she did’nt have any problem keeping the earmaked money. Now I undrerstand she has billed the stae of Alaska for working out of her home per diem a total of 312 times. Works out to roughly 1/2 the time she has been in office. Who sets ther per diem rate? I’d like to sttay at my home and do my job and get paid for it-while I’m at it maybe I can get some earmarks then kill the project and keep the money. Your tax dollars are well spent. From what I see voting for her will leave us standing on the bridge to nowhere. Maverick? I think not.

  5. Matt says:

    Joe Biden has a well documented history of plagiarism. Plagiarism is defined by dictionary.com as “the unauthorized use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one’s own original work.” That sounds an awful lot like lying and cheating to me. But I guess that’s OK because he’s a democrat.

  6. John in Grand Rapids says:

    Aren’t libs great, i can see the foam starting to lather up on the sides of their mouths, they have the llb (Liberal Lawyer Brigade) in Alaska, and just wait, they will get more rabid as McCain and Palin pull further ahead.

  7. sarabeth says:

    Re #3, just in the last 24 hours, several major news outlets, including Newsweek, the Washington Post, the AP, the Wall Street Journal, have called this great American woman on her Bridge to Nowhere lies. Maybe the majority of Americans will see through her deceptions and lies too?

    And maybe you can put your money where your mouth is, and point out exactly what in my post constitutes a half-truth?

  8. If this is all you’ve got, I feel sorry for you. Do you think she used any of that per diem to pay for the transportation back and forth between Wasilla and Anchorage? I guess you think she should personally pay for that? You are pathetic. Go do something useful.

  9. Matt says:

    Hey sarabeth. Why don’t you respond to my comment (#5)?

  10. Jimmy John says:

    You know what? Every political figure is going to have dirt like this if they have been in politics for any amount of time… get over it. of course governers get stuff paid for and all that. it goes with the job. thats not lying or cheating. that’s just he system that we have in America. If you’re upset about that, don’t whine about Palin, whine to EVERYONE EVER ELECTED. is this really news? shocking? interesting? appauling?

    and Meaux: while that’s a bit extreme, im sure there’s more to the story. IE: did these rape victims have health insurance? and what type of hospital did they go to? etc, etc, etc. Im sure in most cases people ARE charged with the medical services they got after a physical crime, we just don’t hear about it. yeah? yeah!

    The state shouldn’t be burdened with covering all the medical of everyone just because they can’t afford it. If you cant afford it, ask yourself why, and adjust your lifestyle accordingly. National Healthcare is a joke and will never fly the world of today.

    HELLLOooo Its called personal responsiblity. Living for one’s self! If i can’t afford something, i save, live responsiblity and live within my means. Prepare for the worst, and all that crap we learn when we are in school.

    Every American full-time employer offers you some sort of medical, so why are people griping about this so much? If you’re part-time, unemployed, sick, etc. well, get something full-time then!!! unemployed? that’s your problem, and there’s PLENTY of other free-bee government orginizations out there that can help you. and: jobs.com. man, get off your ass and pay some taxes! Obama OR McCain would sure love it if you did…

    Nothing in life is free, at the end of the day, do you want to be paying for someone else’s free stuff when they’re obiviously not deserving of it?

    Pay your taxes, go to work, pay your insurance, pay your bills, don’t spend money you don’t have and live responsibly. The American Dream.

    people who DON’T do that have only their self to blame.

  11. Sarabeth-
    If she didn’t stop the bridge, then who did? Where is this bridge? Is it under construction? Maybe you should be asking why the Anchorage newspaper reported that Palin halted the bridge. It’s amazing that nobody disputed that she put an end to this bridge until she was named the VP nominee. Regardless of whether she was originally for it or not the fact remains that she stopped it.

    Sarabeth is the one spreading lies and trying to deceive people…shame on you.

  12. Meaux says:

    Jimmy John: Learn Something:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_kit
    A Rape Kit is not Heathcare- it’s evidence collection. Do the Crime Scene Investigators charge you when they take fingerprints? I think not.
    But thanks for equating rape victims to people who just haven’t done adequate economic planning.

  13. Matt says:

    Hey Meaux, what is your source for your Rape Kit claim?

  14. johngex says:

    Just curious as to why she cut the budget for Special Needs children in 2007 by 60 per cent. Yet in her campaign speech she said she’d be a champion for Special Needs children and their families. Hindsight or hype? I’m one who thinks she didn’t put her money where her mouth is.

  15. Shel in GA says:

    Jimmy John, I gather you have never experienced life in a situation where you worked as hard and as smart as you could, but circumstances kept you from making enough to get beyond survival. If you are truly poor, there are an unbelievable number of obstacles you face, even discrimination no matter your color. Try to understand that there are many people simply cannot afford health insurance. Unlike politicians want you to believe, not all poor people are lazy or on the dole. Republicans (I am one) claim they are the party of the Christians but too many Republicans do not accept “Judge that we be not judged” or “Love your neighbor as yourself”. A little empathy might help us all.

  16. Collin says:

    600 miles, 3 hours all the same? Open your eyes! Its is amazing how people are flocking to a woman with a shady background, an extremist belief, and a history of lies. All of the “Hockey mom’s” out there answer this: is it honest that she implied a sale of a plane on ebay that never sold? Truth is that the plane (which transported convicts across state, and to the prison in MARICOPA COUNTY, Arizona, hummm Arizona huh, we should look into this) was sold by a BROKER for 2.1 mil. to a campaign contributor Larry Reynolds of Valdez, AK. That is $300,000 under bluebook value, hummmm again maybe we should look into this. She also sat in church 2 weeks ago while David Brickner, the executive director of Jews for Jesus said “terrorist attacks on Israelis are God’s “judgment of unbelief” of Jews who haven’t embraced Christianity”. Where is the Rev. Wright witchhunt? As more about this woman trickles out, I urge you to ask yourselves: Am I being fed an Karl Rove born advertising slogan? Or is she actually answering the questions?

  17. Johngex…this is for you…another liberal too lazy to check the facts. I copied and pasted this for you in case you were too lazy to follow this link to the entire article: http://www.newsweek.com/id/157986/page/2

    Those who claim that Palin cut special needs funding by 62 percent are looking in the wrong place and misinterpreting what they find there. They point to an apparent drop in the Department of Education and Early Development budget for special schools. But the special schools budget, despite the similar name, isn’t the special needs budget. “I don’t even consider the special schools component [part of] our special needs funding,” Jeans told FactCheck.org. “The special needs funding is provided through our public school funding formula. The special schools is simply a budget component where we have funding set aside for special projects,” such as the Alaska School for the Deaf and the Alaska Military Youth Academy. A different budget component, the Foundation Program, governs special needs programs in the public school system.

    And in any case, the decrease in funding for special schools is illusory. Palin moved the Alaska Military Youth Academy’s ChalleNGe program, a residential military school program that teaches job and life skills to students under 20, out of the budget line for “special schools” and into its own line. This resulted in an apparent drop of more than $5 million in the special schools budget with no actual decrease in funding for the programs.

  18. Shannon says:

    Some of you really need to do some research of your own before taking everything you read at face value. Look at her expense reports, look at the proposal for the Alaskan special needs budget. They are out there. It only takes a moment of research to stop yourself from looking like a fool. Don’t just get your news from secondhand sources.

  19. Collin:
    I’m having a hard time even starting with your comments because they are so silly and misinformed. You mention the an airplane broker like they are evil. You obviously don’t know that using a broker to buy and sell airplanes is very common. You don’t just run down the street and buy an airplane like a used car. Well, I guess I should say that, maybe you have used jet lots in your area. Given the current fuel prices and rising general aviation costs these days it is not surprising that she didn’t get the “bluebook” value. Plane values are down.

    As for your David Brickner comment, what’s the issue? She didn’t say those things. Do you have a point?

    The rest of your post is rambling drivel. I have no idea where to start addressing it.

  20. Collin: I would like to clarify my last post. It’s very uncommon to sell airplanes on ebay. Palin realized this very quickly when she wasn’t being offered anywhere near the “bluebook” value for the plane. She used the broker so she could recover more money from the sale of the plane. For you to imply that she was being shady because she didn’t actually sell the plane on ebay proves that you totally missed the point, which is she sold the damn airplane to save the state some money.

  21. Nick says:

    Did AOL post a link to 1115 again?

  22. sarabeth says:

    Re 9:

    Hey sarabeth. Why don’t you respond to my comment (#5)?

    Maybe because it has diddly squat to do with my post?

    Maybe because I am overwhelmed by the volume of pure garbage this post has attracted?

  23. sarabeth says:

    re 21: I very much fear so!

  24. Great Danes says:

    ALL THE HATCH STORIES and LIES you and the Other “lefties” are putting all over the Internet and MSNBC,NBC,CBS,CNN ,NTY etc etc….
    For each and every “lie” you tell…. it’s a Vote Aways from Obama and for McCain/Palin.
    Mark My Words…..McCain/Palin Will WIN in a LANDSLIDE!
    Keep up the the DISINFORMATION.

  25. meaux says:

    Matt:
    Here is a site with a few links that checks it out as best as I’ve seen discussed so far:

    http://opedna.com/2008/09/08/wasilla-police-billed-sexual-assault-victims-for-rape-kits/

  26. matt says:

    it was apparently CNN that invited this lovely participation.

  27. kiel says:

    Until 2001, rape victims w/o insurance were charged for rape kits, too. Obama was co-sponsor of a bill to end this practice:

    From the Daily Kos:

    “In the state of Illinois, House Bill 1814 (HB1814) amends the Crime Victims Compensation Act. It was passed in 2001. As indicated here, this bill:

    “Amends the Crime Victims Compensation Act to permit emergency awards; to extend the statute of limitations for filing for compensation from one year to 2 years; and to revise subrogation provisions to require deposits into a special fund for costs related to recovery efforts by the Attorney General. Provides that if the Comptroller offsets a claim, the individual or entity receiving the funds must credit the applicant’s or victim’s account and may not pursue payment from the applicant or victim for the amount. Amends the Court of Claims Act to permit emergency awards to be approved by the decision of one judge.

    “According to the University of Chicago, what this means for rape victims, in plain English, is:

    “‘According to the Sexual Assault Emergency Treatment Act, the Illinois Department of Public Aid will reimburse the costs of ER treatment if you do not have public aid or private medical insurance. Under the Illinois Crime Victim’s Compensation Act, if you report the assault to the police within 72 hours of the crime and if you file a claim application within two years of the date of the crime, you can be reimbursed for out-of-pocket medical expenses, loss of earnings, psychological counseling, and loss of support income due to the crime. Reimbursement can be up to $27,000.’”

    This amendment sponsored by:

    House Sponsors:
    WAIT-KLINGLER-MULLIGAN-PARKE.

    Senate Sponsors:
    DILLARD-OBAMA

    Hey now. Seems like a choice between a rapist-friendly hockey mom with no legislative experience, who wouldn’t know how to write, sponsor, or shepherd a bill into law, and a community activist who does, and also cares about victims of crimes, rather than the criminals.

    Yeah, I can see why you’re all hot after Palin.

  28. kiel says:

    That should include the phrase, “…in Illinois…” in that first sentence.

  29. Eric D. Nelson says:

    Wow! Seeing the recent pictures…it sure is good to see Sharon is eating well these days!

  30. Quinn says:

    Go Sarabeth. You rawk! Just ignore these asses and keep throwing strikes right down the middle of the plate.

  31. matt says:

    >keep throwing strikes right down the middle of the plate

    i don’t know anything about baseball except that the 1985 Pirates loved them some cocaine, but don’t pitches down the middle usually result in home runs for the bad guys?

  32. jamiebeth says:

    you SERIOUSLY don’t know anything about baseball if i know more than you do…. if you throw the ball really, really, really fast right down the middle, it’s a strike, baby, all the way!