Bush v. Law: Law Wins Yet Again
by sarabeth at 7:14 am on July 3rd, 2008 in Bush Man Date, War on TerrorVaughn R. Walker, the chief judge for the Northern District of California, issued an interesting ruling yesterday in the federal judiciary’s ongoing “Slap the Lawless Bastards Down” campaign against the Bush administration’s pathological presidential powers over-reach.
In one stroke, the judge ruled that FISA is the exclusive means for the president to eavesdrop on Americans, and also eviscerated the Bush administration’s favorite defense against charges of violating FISA, by holding that “FISA … limits the executive branch’s authority to assert the state secrets privilege in response to challenges to the legality of its foreign intelligence surveillance activities.”
A federal judge in California said Wednesday that the wiretapping law established by Congress was the “exclusive†means for the president to eavesdrop on Americans, and he rejected the government’s claim that the president’s constitutional authority as commander in chief trumped that law.
The judge, Vaughn R. Walker, the chief judge for the Northern District of California, made his findings in a ruling on a lawsuit brought by an Oregon charity. The group says it has evidence of an illegal wiretap used against it by the National Security Agency under the secret surveillance program established by President Bush after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The Justice Department has tried for more than two years to kill the lawsuit, saying any surveillance of the charity or other entities was a “state secret†and citing the president’s constitutional power as commander in chief to order wiretaps without a warrant from a court under the agency’s program.
But Judge Walker, who was appointed to the bench by former President George Bush, rejected those central claims in his 56-page ruling. He said the rules for surveillance were clearly established by Congress in 1978 under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which requires the government to get a warrant from a secret court.
“Congress appears clearly to have intended to — and did — establish the exclusive means for foreign intelligence activities to be conducted,†the judge wrote. “Whatever power the executive may otherwise have had in this regard, FISA limits the power of the executive branch to conduct such activities and it limits the executive branch’s authority to assert the state secrets privilege in response to challenges to the legality of its foreign intelligence surveillance activities.â€
Judge Walker’s voice carries extra weight because all the lawsuits involving telephone companies that took part in the N.S.A. program have been consolidated and are being heard in his court.
Post a Comment