<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holding Obama To His Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2008/06/25/holding-obama-to-his-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/06/25/holding-obama-to-his-word/</link>
	<description>west coast cap peelers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:48:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/06/25/holding-obama-to-his-word/comment-page-1/#comment-76022</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/06/25/holding-obama-to-his-word/#comment-76022</guid>
		<description>The answer to that last question is: apparently not!

The candidate formerly known as Barack Obama has been taken over by Republican talking points.  Republican campaign morality too.

So despite that crystal-clear statement that &quot;Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companiesâ€, and despite the fact that a filibuster is begging to be supported, Obama is &lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/obama_on_fisa_telecom_immunity.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;evidently going to pass&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Asked specifically why he&#039;s supporting the current FISA bill when he&#039;d promised months ago to support a filibuster of an earlier version of the bill, Obama suggested flat out that &quot;national security&quot; overrides the question of telecom immunity...
&lt;em&gt;&quot;My view on FISA has always been that the issue of the phone companies per se is not one that overrides the security interests of the American people.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Guy can&#039;t even wait till after the elections to start reneging on promises.  Not a good sign, I don&#039;t think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to that last question is: apparently not!</p>
<p>The candidate formerly known as Barack Obama has been taken over by Republican talking points.  Republican campaign morality too.</p>
<p>So despite that crystal-clear statement that &#8220;Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companiesâ€, and despite the fact that a filibuster is begging to be supported, Obama is <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/obama_on_fisa_telecom_immunity.php" rel="nofollow">evidently going to pass</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Asked specifically why he&#8217;s supporting the current FISA bill when he&#8217;d promised months ago to support a filibuster of an earlier version of the bill, Obama suggested flat out that &#8220;national security&#8221; overrides the question of telecom immunity&#8230;<br />
<em>&#8220;My view on FISA has always been that the issue of the phone companies per se is not one that overrides the security interests of the American people.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Guy can&#8217;t even wait till after the elections to start reneging on promises.  Not a good sign, I don&#8217;t think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
