Comments on: Appeals Court Finds Six-year Detainee Is Not Enemy Combatant http://www.1115.org/2008/06/23/appeals-court-finds-six-year-detainee-is-not-enemy-combatant/ west coast cap peelers Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:18:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: sarabeth http://www.1115.org/2008/06/23/appeals-court-finds-six-year-detainee-is-not-enemy-combatant/comment-page-1/#comment-76001 sarabeth Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:43:57 +0000 http://www.1115.org/2008/06/23/appeals-court-finds-six-year-detainee-is-not-enemy-combatant/#comment-76001 Here's the funny part: inasmuch as Parhat was unlawfully designated an enemy combatant, he is an "unlawful enemy combatant", and therefore worthy of incarceration in Guantanamo. Here’s the funny part: inasmuch as Parhat was unlawfully designated an enemy combatant, he is an “unlawful enemy combatant”, and therefore worthy of incarceration in Guantanamo.

]]> By: sarabeth http://www.1115.org/2008/06/23/appeals-court-finds-six-year-detainee-is-not-enemy-combatant/comment-page-1/#comment-76000 sarabeth Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:26:20 +0000 http://www.1115.org/2008/06/23/appeals-court-finds-six-year-detainee-is-not-enemy-combatant/#comment-76000 Just to be clear, this decision was not related in any way to the Supreme Court’s June 12 decision. It resulted from an Appeals Court review of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal's decision that Parhat is an enemy combatant. It is, though, the first civilian court review of a Guantanamo detainee's case. Just to be clear, this decision was not related in any way to the Supreme Court’s June 12 decision. It resulted from an Appeals Court review of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal’s decision that Parhat is an enemy combatant.

It is, though, the first civilian court review of a Guantanamo detainee’s case.

]]>