Almost every McCain position amounts to “I don’t know much about it, when I’m President, we’ll just get people together and talk it through.”

yeah, this didn’t work out so well in the time of bush.

however, i’d feel a lot better if obama’s position on so many issues didn’t amount to “we’ll figure out a bi-partisan solution.”

feel like defending obama? defend obama. just because he’s “better” than mccain doesn’t mean anything.

I wasn’t joking.

Troll away, dude. The idea the Obama lacks details compared to McCain is laughable. Almost every McCain position amounts to “I don’t know much about it, when I’m President, we’ll just get people together and talk it through.”

He had a press conf last week to talk about the economic situation (a concept), would you care to list the details that he listed in support of this concept?

There’s also this “concept” of the war that’s going sideways killing American soldiers every day, care to enlighten us to his details about how we’re going to deal with that other than to just ride it out?

I could go on…

“there’s a point at which self-serving statements cross the line and become unacceptable dishonesty.”

Yes, “very candidate does that” and Obama is no different. Do you really think that if the circumstances were reversed Obama wouldn’t have the “exact same stance” on MI/FL that Clinton does? Of course he would. Just “one” of Obama’s recent examples: He states superdelegates should vote with their state (unless of course a superdelegate from a Clinton won state wants to come to his side).

How about Obama first saying he never witnessed Wright doing one of his “controversial” sermons and then (when called on it) saying: “oh yea” I guess I did see a few of those but I disagreed with him on those points (I just didn’t “say” anything or “leave”. In fact, he had Wright do my Wedding and the baptism of my kids…) Oh great!

“What’s kind of funny is that two weeks ago, Hillary was using almost the identical language to press her case for a re-vote in Michigan. In that context, the language made some sense. In the context of seating the originally “elected” delegates, though, it’s blatantly dishonest”

She tried to get the right thing done by supporting a re-vote in MI. It should be either a re-vote (should have been done) “or” seat them as is (again, she pushed for the re-vote until it was too late for that option). Fl should count regardless (as has been posted on this blog site (and stated on various radio/TV programs) by a few people (record turnout and all names on ballot).

McCain is looking better and better vs. Obama (who loves “talking about concepts” but lacks details for those “concepts”). Up until February I never would have thought the Republicans stood a chance of taking the Presidency but the Democrats may just succeed in giving it away (again)…

Yes, “very candidate does that” and Obama is no different. Do you really think that if the circumstances were reversed Obama wouldn’t have the “exact same stance” on MI/FL that Clinton does? Of course he would. Just “one” of Obama’s recent examples: He states superdelegates should vote with their state (unless of course a superdelegate from a Clinton won state wants to come to his side).

How about Obama first saying he never witnessed Wright doing one of his “controversial” sermons and then (when called on it) saying: “oh yea” I guess I did see a few of those but I disagreed with him on those points (I just didn’t “say” anything or “leave”. In fact, he had Wright do my Wedding and the baptism of my kids…) Oh great!

“What’s kind of funny is that two weeks ago, Hillary was using almost the identical language to press her case for a re-vote in Michigan. In that context, the language made some sense. In the context of seating the originally “elected” delegates, though, it’s blatantly dishonest”

She tried to get the right thing done by supporting a re-vote in MI. It should be either a re-vote (should have been done) “or” seat them as is (again, she pushed for the re-vote until it was too late for that option). Fl should count regardless (as has been posted on this blog site (and stated on various radio/TV programs) by a few people (record turnout and all names on ballot).

McCain is looking better and better vs. Obama (who loves “talking about concepts” but lacks details for those “concepts”). Up until February I never would have thought the Republicans stood a chance of taking the Presidency but the Democrats may just succeed in giving it away (again)…