<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Obama Win Pennsylvania?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75648</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75648</guid>
		<description>learn to speak the language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>learn to speak the language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75646</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75646</guid>
		<description>Listen, all voters should vote for Obama, it only
make since. If the republicans vote for Hilary just
to think they rather see Hilary vs Mccain, the
voters need to man up by voting for Obama. The
Clintons had their chances and messed it up.
This country need a fresh change, the old politics
need to disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, all voters should vote for Obama, it only<br />
make since. If the republicans vote for Hilary just<br />
to think they rather see Hilary vs Mccain, the<br />
voters need to man up by voting for Obama. The<br />
Clintons had their chances and messed it up.<br />
This country need a fresh change, the old politics<br />
need to disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75625</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75625</guid>
		<description>&quot;I know that. The voters needed to change their voter registration by a date March. Some of the widely listened to Republican talk radio shows urged Republicans to do exactly that and many people called in acknowledging that they had done so.&quot;

what are we talking about, 10, maybe 15 whole voters? come on now, people are lazy as hell. nobody is switching registrations just to vote for hillary in the penn primary. get off the rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I know that. The voters needed to change their voter registration by a date March. Some of the widely listened to Republican talk radio shows urged Republicans to do exactly that and many people called in acknowledging that they had done so.&#8221;</p>
<p>what are we talking about, 10, maybe 15 whole voters? come on now, people are lazy as hell. nobody is switching registrations just to vote for hillary in the penn primary. get off the rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75622</guid>
		<description>&quot;but they definitely do not want Obama because heâ€™s seen as even more liberal than Clinton.&quot;

Before anyone incorrectly comments on that statement with something like &quot;More Republicans think they can beat Clinton easier than they think they can beat Obama&quot; I&#039;ll beat them to the punch and tell them to read the last sentence in #7 again (maybe a little slower this time) so they can see I said &quot;many conservatives&quot; not &quot;all conservatives&quot; or even &quot;most conservatives&quot;...  Even a few % of Republicans voting for Clinton in the Dem&#039;s primary will not only increase her winning % in Pennsylvania.  Just as importantly, it will also help close the gap in the Nat&#039;l popular vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but they definitely do not want Obama because heâ€™s seen as even more liberal than Clinton.&#8221;</p>
<p>Before anyone incorrectly comments on that statement with something like &#8220;More Republicans think they can beat Clinton easier than they think they can beat Obama&#8221; I&#8217;ll beat them to the punch and tell them to read the last sentence in #7 again (maybe a little slower this time) so they can see I said &#8220;many conservatives&#8221; not &#8220;all conservatives&#8221; or even &#8220;most conservatives&#8221;&#8230;  Even a few % of Republicans voting for Clinton in the Dem&#8217;s primary will not only increase her winning % in Pennsylvania.  Just as importantly, it will also help close the gap in the Nat&#8217;l popular vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75621</guid>
		<description>#3-
&quot;it is quite another for someone to be systematically pitching the proposition to Pennsylvania voters that they have the unique opportunity to stop Hillary. That even if they find they prefer Hillary to Obama, they should still ask themselves: â€œHow concerned am I about the nomination fight dragging on till the convention?â€&quot;

That&#039;s exactly what I was talking about so there&#039;s nothing &quot;quite different&quot; about it.  The &quot;overall&quot; ramifications are &quot;the unique opportunity to stop Hillary&quot; which would obviously stop &quot;the nomination fight dragging on till the convention&quot;.  If the &quot;on the fence&quot; Clinton/Obama voters haven&#039;t already been considering this (for many weeks) maybe they should just stay on the fence because their brains aren&#039;t working...


&quot;Reading comprehension issues? &quot;

I actually prefer not to &quot;go there&quot; (infer someone else has issues) but since you brought it up...  My first comment was clearly referring to the last sentence of your post (since I copy/pasted it).  In that sentence of you were clearly referring to the very point you just &quot;re-wrote&quot; in #3 (in the first paragraph starting with &quot;it is quite another for someone to be...&quot;).  Therefore, my first post was obviously &quot;already&quot; speaking to the very points you simply restated in post #3.  That shouldâ€™ve been crystal clear the first time you read post #1&amp;2...


&quot;The universally acknowledged reason why Republicans prefer to face Hillary rather than Obama is that they regard her as easier to beat.&quot;

Oh yes, &quot;universally acknowledged&quot;.  First, the polls (that you seem to like watching &amp; citing) have actually gone back and forth on who wins (Clinton or Obama) and by how much vs. McCain.  Second, for the record, polls are next to worthless and change like the wind based on who conducts them as well as numerous sampling error factors that make them extremely unreliable.  Third, I&#039;ve listened to good arguments as to why McCain may have a better chance against Obama.  

BTW, since you like polls, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve read a few polls over the past few weeks that said more Clinton supporters would vote for McCain over Obama than Obama supporters who would vote for McCain over Clinton.  I&#039;ve actually seen a few polls saying the exact opposite as well but generally the numbers were much closer to par in the polls that favored Obama.  Again, people should realize that polls are meaningless &amp; the only reason I even mention them is because I know you like them.  Personally, I&#039;m a long time Democratic voter who will vote for McCain vs. Obama.

#5- 
No kidding, it&#039;s closed?..  

I know that.  The voters needed to change their voter registration by a date March.  Some of the widely listened to Republican talk radio shows urged Republicans to do exactly that and many people called in acknowledging that they had done so.  Like I said before, many conservatives are worried that they may lose against &quot;either Dem candidate&quot; but they definitely do not want Obama because he&#039;s seen as even more liberal than Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3-<br />
&#8220;it is quite another for someone to be systematically pitching the proposition to Pennsylvania voters that they have the unique opportunity to stop Hillary. That even if they find they prefer Hillary to Obama, they should still ask themselves: â€œHow concerned am I about the nomination fight dragging on till the convention?â€&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what I was talking about so there&#8217;s nothing &#8220;quite different&#8221; about it.  The &#8220;overall&#8221; ramifications are &#8220;the unique opportunity to stop Hillary&#8221; which would obviously stop &#8220;the nomination fight dragging on till the convention&#8221;.  If the &#8220;on the fence&#8221; Clinton/Obama voters haven&#8217;t already been considering this (for many weeks) maybe they should just stay on the fence because their brains aren&#8217;t working&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Reading comprehension issues? &#8221;</p>
<p>I actually prefer not to &#8220;go there&#8221; (infer someone else has issues) but since you brought it up&#8230;  My first comment was clearly referring to the last sentence of your post (since I copy/pasted it).  In that sentence of you were clearly referring to the very point you just &#8220;re-wrote&#8221; in #3 (in the first paragraph starting with &#8220;it is quite another for someone to be&#8230;&#8221;).  Therefore, my first post was obviously &#8220;already&#8221; speaking to the very points you simply restated in post #3.  That shouldâ€™ve been crystal clear the first time you read post #1&amp;2&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The universally acknowledged reason why Republicans prefer to face Hillary rather than Obama is that they regard her as easier to beat.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh yes, &#8220;universally acknowledged&#8221;.  First, the polls (that you seem to like watching &amp; citing) have actually gone back and forth on who wins (Clinton or Obama) and by how much vs. McCain.  Second, for the record, polls are next to worthless and change like the wind based on who conducts them as well as numerous sampling error factors that make them extremely unreliable.  Third, I&#8217;ve listened to good arguments as to why McCain may have a better chance against Obama.  </p>
<p>BTW, since you like polls, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve read a few polls over the past few weeks that said more Clinton supporters would vote for McCain over Obama than Obama supporters who would vote for McCain over Clinton.  I&#8217;ve actually seen a few polls saying the exact opposite as well but generally the numbers were much closer to par in the polls that favored Obama.  Again, people should realize that polls are meaningless &amp; the only reason I even mention them is because I know you like them.  Personally, I&#8217;m a long time Democratic voter who will vote for McCain vs. Obama.</p>
<p>#5-<br />
No kidding, it&#8217;s closed?..  </p>
<p>I know that.  The voters needed to change their voter registration by a date March.  Some of the widely listened to Republican talk radio shows urged Republicans to do exactly that and many people called in acknowledging that they had done so.  Like I said before, many conservatives are worried that they may lose against &#8220;either Dem candidate&#8221; but they definitely do not want Obama because he&#8217;s seen as even more liberal than Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75620</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75620</guid>
		<description>&gt;pennsylvania is a closed primary

thank heavens for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>pennsylvania is a closed primary</p>
<p>thank heavens for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75619</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75619</guid>
		<description>&quot;One thing that could have an impact (degree yet to be seen) is the number of Republicans who have set themselves up to vote for Clinton in order to help her win the state vs, Obama.&quot;

pennsylvania is a closed primary, so that would require republicans changing their voter registration to dem just to vote for hillary. i doubt that will be a significant issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One thing that could have an impact (degree yet to be seen) is the number of Republicans who have set themselves up to vote for Clinton in order to help her win the state vs, Obama.&#8221;</p>
<p>pennsylvania is a closed primary, so that would require republicans changing their voter registration to dem just to vote for hillary. i doubt that will be a significant issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75616</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75616</guid>
		<description>The possibilities of Obama winning Pensylvania are rather obvious. This race needs to be over and the people of Pennsylvania have the opportunity to make that decission for America. I am starting to think that Hillary Clinton is not interested in the Presidency but would readily though secretely support McCain should she lose to Obama. Most definitely an Hillary/McCain contest will deliver Mcain and the opposite is true should it be Obama/McCain. McCain will have a run for his money and a big defeat. I agree its not about liberalness. For starters would Hillary make a good Vice President?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The possibilities of Obama winning Pensylvania are rather obvious. This race needs to be over and the people of Pennsylvania have the opportunity to make that decission for America. I am starting to think that Hillary Clinton is not interested in the Presidency but would readily though secretely support McCain should she lose to Obama. Most definitely an Hillary/McCain contest will deliver Mcain and the opposite is true should it be Obama/McCain. McCain will have a run for his money and a big defeat. I agree its not about liberalness. For starters would Hillary make a good Vice President?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75612</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75612</guid>
		<description>Reading comprehension issues?  

For people to be &quot;thinking about the overall ramifications of an Obama win in Pennsylvania&quot; is one thing; it is quite another for someone to be systematically pitching the proposition to Pennsylvania voters that they have the unique opportunity to stop Hillary.  That even if they find they prefer Hillary to Obama, they should still ask themselves: &quot;How concerned am I about the nomination fight dragging on till the convention?&quot;

So Hillary is a liberal and Obama is an ultra liberal?  Really? 

The universally acknowledged reason why Republicans prefer to face Hillary rather than Obama is that they regard her as easier to beat.  For reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with relative liberalness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading comprehension issues?  </p>
<p>For people to be &#8220;thinking about the overall ramifications of an Obama win in Pennsylvania&#8221; is one thing; it is quite another for someone to be systematically pitching the proposition to Pennsylvania voters that they have the unique opportunity to stop Hillary.  That even if they find they prefer Hillary to Obama, they should still ask themselves: &#8220;How concerned am I about the nomination fight dragging on till the convention?&#8221;</p>
<p>So Hillary is a liberal and Obama is an ultra liberal?  Really? </p>
<p>The universally acknowledged reason why Republicans prefer to face Hillary rather than Obama is that they regard her as easier to beat.  For reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with relative liberalness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-75611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/04/03/could-obama-win-pennsylvania/#comment-75611</guid>
		<description>#1 was refering to this quote from the post:

&quot;Especially if someone starts putting it to them in these terms between now and April 22.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 was refering to this quote from the post:</p>
<p>&#8220;Especially if someone starts putting it to them in these terms between now and April 22.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

