<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shotgun Wedding Arranged By The Fed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2008/03/25/the-shotgun-wedding-arranged-by-the-fed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/03/25/the-shotgun-wedding-arranged-by-the-fed/</link>
	<description>west coast cap peelers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:48:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2008/03/25/the-shotgun-wedding-arranged-by-the-fed/comment-page-1/#comment-75554</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2008/03/25/the-shotgun-wedding-arranged-by-the-fed/#comment-75554</guid>
		<description>In the last section of the post, I focused on the original terms of the transaction, for several reasons:
-- That&#039;s what the Fed presided over and dictated, and what the boards of JPMorgan and Bear Stearns agreed to; the revised terms were in reaction to pressure from Bear Stearns stockholders.
-- That gives us the value of the original Fed guarantee, and the size of the original boondoogle; with the revised terms, the value of the guarantee goes down slightly, and the ripoff of Bear Stearns stockholders goes down by that amount plus the $944 million extra that JPMorgan is paying them.  Even under the revised terms, it&#039;s still a humongous handout, and it&#039;s still a massive rip-off.
-- The $12 billion value increase on Monday the 17th can reasonably be attributed to news of the merger deal; the total increase between March 14 and March 24 would be attributable to too many different factors and much harder to disentangle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last section of the post, I focused on the original terms of the transaction, for several reasons:<br />
&#8211; That&#8217;s what the Fed presided over and dictated, and what the boards of JPMorgan and Bear Stearns agreed to; the revised terms were in reaction to pressure from Bear Stearns stockholders.<br />
&#8211; That gives us the value of the original Fed guarantee, and the size of the original boondoogle; with the revised terms, the value of the guarantee goes down slightly, and the ripoff of Bear Stearns stockholders goes down by that amount plus the $944 million extra that JPMorgan is paying them.  Even under the revised terms, it&#8217;s still a humongous handout, and it&#8217;s still a massive rip-off.<br />
&#8211; The $12 billion value increase on Monday the 17th can reasonably be attributed to news of the merger deal; the total increase between March 14 and March 24 would be attributable to too many different factors and much harder to disentangle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
