Comments on: The Clinton Campaign’s Hollow Claims

By: sarabeth

sarabeth — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:11:55 +0000

sued, dude? for what? and by whom?

By: www.mensrea@hotmail.

www.mensrea@hotmail. — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:16:33 +0000

Aren’t you worried about getting sued?

By: sarabeth

sarabeth — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:52:58 +0000

what can I say? I just hate being made to look rediculous.

By: michael p

michael p — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:36:27 +0000

This is about the previous email about the Halliburton rapes I believe that who ever the writer Sara is owes the Barker family an apology of her smart A.. comment and her horrible support for women how dare you mock a family that has suffered because after your false information and article you ignore the justice for Barker close the blog for comments and put your unprofessional comment of this is not the Tracy Barker fan club or Barker family blog how dare you we only hope that you are never raped Sara and then used by another victim like Jones have used Barker and lied about afadavits and lied to congress and then used by attorneys then tossed aside I hardly think that an upset father and sister stating the truth even if it made your article look rediculous that an upset family is a fan club Sara you are a freakin jerk abd I hope someday you loose your job maybe you arent a women at all after reading how you treat victims that are crying for help check your fact Sara !

By: sarabeth

sarabeth — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:41:57 +0000

Actually, something tells me he’s playing a deep, double-agent type game.

I think his real agenda is not an anti-Bill agenda or an anti-Hillary agenda (or even an anti-Sarabeth agenda). He’s just getting warmed up to argue that John McCain, confessed adulterer, should be hung and quartered, either before or after being impeached, which could be done either before or after the election.

The next step, of course, would be to start impeaching people before they cheat on their wives, whether illegally or legally.

By: jamiebeth

jamiebeth — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:08:53 +0000

sb, it’s as if “frank tells” heard you from across the internet and stepped up to make it worse. sheesh!

By: frank tells

frank tells — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:56:03 +0000

I WANT TO FIX HILLARY CLINTON FOR STAYING WITH BILL WHEN SHE SHOULD HAVE DIVORCED HIM OVER:
1. HIS ANTIMASTURBATION
2. HIS CHEATING ADULTERY
ALSO IM AGAINST HER NOT LISTENING TO ME ABOUT VOTING AGAINST THE ANTI POKER BILL (PHONE CALLS, LETTERS) AND RECEIVING FUNDING FROM HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES WHEN THEY ARE ALREADY OVERCHARGING AND AGE DISCRIMINATING. I ALSO BELIEVE LIKE JOE LIEBERMAN THAT BILL CLINTON SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED AFTER ILLEGALLY CHEATING ON HIS WIFE.

By: sarabeth

sarabeth — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:58:04 +0000

I really don’t understand what’s going on these days in the comments section, with all kinds of people we have never seen or heard of before surfacing regularly with long, prefabricated comments that often have almost nothing to do with the post they are appended to.

Making it worse, these comments usually consist of Obama versus Hillary talking points (or vice versa), tired old talking points which have pretty much been thoroughly aired, and comprehensively discredited by the other side a long time ago.

Why anyone thinks it worth their while to come here and post this stuff now totally baffles me.

But comment #2 has baffled me even more than the stuff I just described. Six paragraphs, most of which just rehashes what was in the post, without providing any new perspective on any of it. What’s the point?

By: Matthew

Matthew — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:00:48 +0000

I used to hope that Hillary would run for President years before she announced the idea. I have alway thought of her as a smart ,hard-working and caring person who would do the right thing no matter what. Now that I see how she is handling herself in this campaign, it is obvious she doesn’t like to lose and if she can’t win she will do her best to make sure Obama doesn’t either. I used to trust her but she has not got the experience to be President, and with all of the race baiting, she just plain scares me, this is the real reason she lost me and so many other Blacks. All the race baiting has got to stop and she should stop running for President for the good of the party. Democrats are going to vote the Democratic nominee no matter who it is the the so-called “important states” like Ohio and Florida. Every state has alway been important and Bush has “won” by slim margins each time. If Florida and Michigan are not seated, California and Texas are likely to be the most important states this go around having so many electoral ballots. Obama has done something past Dems have not done in years, win in “overlooked states” that have ballots that count toward deciding the Presidency. Hillary, please stop being selfish and realize this is not your time, Stop giving the Republicans ammo and start supporting Obama to win the Presidency now, before Pennsylvania. If anyone saw McCain’s bio, he may be a war hero, and I applaude him for that, but he also more for surging ahead with world wars than Bush rather than taking care of his own backyard, and that makes him worse for America.

By: Jay W.

Jay W. — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:53:01 +0000

On March 6 Hillary Clinton claimed that, unlike Barack Obama, she and likely Republican nominee John McCain have “cross[ed] the commander-in-chief threshold.” In a CNN interview the day before, Clinton had listed five foreign policy accomplishments. We can’t determine how much behind-the-scenes work Clinton did while first lady, and she certainly took an active interest in foreign policy when her husband was president. Moreover, her time as first lady plus her longer Senate career do give Clinton more foreign policy experience than Obama. But the public record of her actions shows that many of Clinton’s foreign policy claims are exaggerated.

Clinton claims to have “negotiated open borders” in Macedonia to fleeing Kosovar refugees. But the Macedonian border opened a full day before she arrived, and her meetings with Macedonian officials were too brief to allow for much serious negotiating.

Clinton’s activities “helped bring peace to Northern Ireland.” Irish officials are divided as to how helpful Clinton’s actions were, and key players agree that she was not directly involved in any actual negotiations.

Clinton has repeatedly referenced her “dangerous” trip to Bosnia. She fails to mention, however, that the Bosnian war had officially ended three months before her visit â€“ or that she made the trip with her 16-year-old daughter and two entertainers.

Both Bill and Hillary Clinton claim that Hillary privately championed the use of U.S. troops to stop the genocide in Rwanda. That conversation left no public record, however, as U.S. policy was explicitly to stay out of Rwanda, and officials say that the use of U.S. troops was never considered.

Clinton’s tough speech on human rights delivered to a Beijing audience is as advertised, though Clinton herself has been dismissive of speeches that aren’t backed by solutions.