Comments on: Should Hillary Clinton Quit?

By: matt

matt — Wed, 14 May 2008 18:19:03 +0000

Teresa, people like you and I and the â€œvast majorityâ€…

stop using that phrase until you know what it means.

By: Xavier

Xavier — Wed, 14 May 2008 17:12:02 +0000

Teresa, people like you and I and the “vast majority” of Obama supporters will still vote democratic, even though Clinton has proven to be a cut-throat, say anything, do anything, rule change phen (as long as it’s to her advantage) because as she said, unlike her supporters we are “educated” and not so blue collared (in other words: red-necked) that we won’t vote for a black man, instead of a foolish white one who will only get us in deeper debt, prolong a failing war, have gas prices up to $10/gall within his 1st term and not even consider providing healthcare to most americans and affordable college tuition.

By: matt

matt — Wed, 14 May 2008 13:49:54 +0000

If you are a democrat, then vote
democrat.

to what end? i don’t support either one because neither speaks for me.

By: Teresa

Teresa — Wed, 14 May 2008 03:41:49 +0000

I think Hillary should stop, and let Barrack spend
his time and money on preparing for the McCain
battle.

I am waiting to find out whom he will choose as
a running mate.

West Virginia and Kentucky will vote for Hillary
in the majority, then Barrack will take the last three
states in the race. She’s run out of money and
time and it wastes tax payers money to run
elections.

I keep hearing about states not getting counted,
I think a lot of states don’t get counted as a usual
election, because a winner is announced before
all states can vote. We in the West know full
well what that feels like, year after year after year
the president is always elected before it reaches
WA and Oregon.

To those of you who say you won’t vote for anyone
but Hillary, If you are a democrat, then vote
democrat. If some fluke made it so that Obama
loses I would hate to vote for Hillary, but I will
because McCain is not the answer and not voting
for the democrat party in these trying times would
be ludicrous.

By: matt

matt — Sat, 10 May 2008 19:01:55 +0000

you just defined “vast majority” as 50+1.

And you’re apparently too fucking stupid to even be embarrased.

Heckuva job.

By: Xavier

Xavier — Sat, 10 May 2008 15:25:40 +0000

…and you have taken another page from Hillary’s book of how to plausibly deny and when all else fails, go back to your native tongue…hers is bigotry, your’s is ignorant profanities. You should call her campaign headquarters and sign up before it dissolves!

By: matt

matt — Sat, 10 May 2008 04:22:34 +0000

vast majority simply means very great in size, amount, degree – a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total.

wow. you are a fucking moron.

and i’m not a loyal subject of anyone.

By: Xavier

Xavier — Fri, 09 May 2008 21:58:53 +0000

I guess matt has read Clinton’s math and english books; because according to the one’s most widely excepted in the west, vast majority simply means very great in size, amount, degree – a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total. Furthermore, 1+1=2, no matter how you slice it, it is as constant as the law of gravity. Unfortunately for Hillary and her loyal subjects, these rules and definitions don’t change, just because you really, really, really want them to.

By: matt

matt — Thu, 08 May 2008 18:12:59 +0000

>It is crystal clear to all who are not delusional that the vast majority of Americans want Obama to be the nominee

depends on the definition of vast and majority. “crystal clear” and delusional too.

By: Xavier

Xavier — Thu, 08 May 2008 16:10:49 +0000

Let’s all be realistic. It is crystal clear to all who are not delusional that the vast majority of Americans want Obama to be the nominee, or they don’t want Clinton (however you choose to view the glass:1/2 full, 1/2 empty). I admire her drive, tenacity and determination, however, should it be at the expense of the party. This is the dems presidency to lose, if we continue this madness and her unbridled obsession to be the first woman president. I am not mad at her for wanting that distinction, but it is frustrating me and many of my fellow Americans that she has wreckless disregard for the health of our party. I can’t wait until either she excepts the facts and the math (that is taught to our elementary school kids) or June 3 inevitably shows her how many more Americans don’t want her to be the nominee. I’d like to spare her the continued ego assault.