Remember Madonna Constantine? She’s the Columbia University professor who jumped into the headlines last fall, and was lionized by the media and blogs, after a noose was found on her office door in the aftermath of the racist nonsense that went down in Jena.
Well, she’s in the news again, and this time she’s probably not quite as pleased to be in the limelight. Not much adulation and lionizing this time around. A lot of very pathetic posturing. And the most egregious race-card-playing I’ve ever seen in my life.
It seems that at the time the noose was discovered on her door, Constantine was already under investigation for plagiarism by Columbia University’s Teacher’s College. The college has now gone public with its findings:
Teachers College of Columbia University confirmed today that it has sanctioned Professor Madonna Constantine after an internal investigation found numerous instances in which she used others’ work without attribution in papers she published in academic journals over the past five years. The investigation, which began in 2006, was prompted by complaints from students and one former faculty member who said language from materials they wrote was included without attribution in the articles.
The investigation, which was conducted by Hughes Hubbard & Reed, a law firm with a substantial practice representing universities and academic institutions, concluded that Professor Constantine’s explanation for the strikingly similar language was not credible.
The College will not specify the sanctions imposed against Professor Constantine. Teachers College takes academic plagiarism very seriously, and must take appropriate disciplinary action when it is uncovered. Such misconduct is completely at odds with the ethos of our institution, our faculty and our students.
Academics, of course, have a special contempt for plagiarists, and I confess to that bias. Specially contemptible is the senior professor who abuses her position of power to steal from her students.
Tracy Juliao, one of the two former students who said Dr. Constantine used her writings without attribution, said an article by Dr. Constantine and another author in the April 2006 issue of Professional School Counseling included about 20 passages with wording that she believed was “verbatim or near verbatim” to her doctoral thesis.
This is, of course, totally disgusting. But it is also pitifully egregious. Constantine obviously felt that she was untouchable. That she could get away with even this kind of blatant and open plagiarism, lifting verbatim passages from a published thesis.
After the findings of the plagiarism investigation were announced, Constantine apparently decided she may as well go ahead and show everyone exactly what she’s made of (and it certainly isn’t sugar and spice and everything nice):
I am outraged by the President’s memo that summarized the outcomes of a “neutral” investigation that I used the work of others without appropriate attribution. The premature, vindictive, and mean-spirited action taken by the administration to release a statement to the faculty regarding the results of this biased and flawed investigation reflects not only a profound lack of sensitivity and due process, but it also may have sufficiently “poisoned the well” for any fair and objective review of the matter. These actions are historically unprecedented at Teachers College. I am left to wonder whether a White faculty member would have been treated in such a publicly disrespectful and disparaging manner.
[...]
It is my opinion that this investigation, along with other incidents that have happened to me at Teachers College in recent months, point to a conspiracy and witch-hunt by certain current and former members of the Teachers College community. I believe that nothing that has happened to me this year is coincidental, particularly when I reflect upon the hate crime I experienced last semester involving a noose on my office door. As one of only two tenured Black women full professors at Teachers College, it pains me to conclude that I have been specifically and systematically targeted.
When I read that Teacher’s College had entrusted the investigation of plagiarism charges to an outside law firm, I was frankly baffled. I’ve never heard of anything like this in my 18 years in higher education, in various universities (and, trust me, I’ve heard of my fair share of very weird stuff). Plagiarism charges are routinely investigated by standing committees. First at the college level, and then, if necessary, at the university level. In unusually complicated cases, the investigation might be handed over to university lawyers. But handing over a plagiarism investigation at the outset to an outside law firm is unprecedented in my experience.
However, having heard from La Constantine, I can now appreciate where the university may have been coming from on this. I’m willing to bet a tidy sum that Constantine has a reputation for playing the race card every chance she gets. Everything that’s ever happened to her in her career that she didn’t much like is, I’ll warrant, the result of a conspiracy and a witch-hunt.
This current conspiracy is bound to be a doozy, whenever La Constantine gets around to fleshing out the details for us. I, for one, am dying to hear how the noose-hanger conspired with Constantine’s graduate students and the Columbia University/Teacher’s College hierarchy to heap all this gratuitous vilification upon her. (For that matter, I really think it’s time Constantine let the world know who hung the noose. She clearly knows, doesn’t she?)