Financing Ron Paul

Who is Ron Paul, and why is he consistently able to raise millions of dollars for his presidential campaign in a day?

Good questions, both. The trouble is that as you start to answer the first, the second becomes even more of a mystery.

Kos uncovers this gem from “The Ron Paul Political Report” from 1992:

Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty, and the end of welfare and affirmative action…. Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the “criminal justice system,” I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.

If similar in-depth studies were conducted in other major cities, who doubts that similar results would be produced? We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings, and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers.

So that’s who Ron Paul is.

Can we safely assume that 95% of the people who contributed $6 million to Ron Paul’s campaign on December 16 (or $19 million this quarter) are nuts or maniacs, or both.

Comments

  1. Commenter says:

    Paul didn’t write those words, and his supporters know it. This “story” broke some 6 years ago, kinda makes you wonder how come he keeps getting re-elected to congress.

  2. sarabeth says:

    Pardon me if I reserve judgment till I see a correction from Kos, or read it from some reliable source.

    Meanwhile, denial is certainly one explanation for the second mystery.

  3. matt says:

    >and his supporters know it

    how exactly is that?

    >kinda makes you wonder how come he keeps getting re-elected to congress.

    lots of psychopaths get reelected to congress.

    ron paul supporters have managed to be even more annoying than obama supporters. very surprising.

  4. Mike says:

    The fact that the remarks are taken out of context and only shown as context No one has shown the whole report in what it was relating to. I’m betting it was an arguement he was making a case for in congress about washingtons criminal reporting system. But since no one can see the full picture here I reserve this to be smear tatics.

  5. sarabeth says:

    Oh, dear. Another illiterate defender of the faith.