<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, Well, Well!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58795</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely Enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58795</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope its Liz Dole.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ewww... That&#039;s just an order of creepiness that I&#039;m not willing to imagine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I hope its Liz Dole.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ewww&#8230; That&#8217;s just an order of creepiness that I&#8217;m not willing to imagine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick in Beantown</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58792</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick in Beantown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58792</guid>
		<description>I hope its Liz Dole.  That would be HOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope its Liz Dole.  That would be HOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58791</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58791</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just barely.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

depends on the definition of barely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just barely.</p></blockquote>
<p>depends on the definition of barely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sac</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58788</link>
		<dc:creator>sac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58788</guid>
		<description>I should add that I find it distasteful to delve into anyone&#039;s personal life. I don&#039;t care if they take Fido out back and give it to him from behind. However, the hypocrisy of someone like Vitter does justify all of this a bit. Just barely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that I find it distasteful to delve into anyone&#8217;s personal life. I don&#8217;t care if they take Fido out back and give it to him from behind. However, the hypocrisy of someone like Vitter does justify all of this a bit. Just barely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sac</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58787</link>
		<dc:creator>sac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58787</guid>
		<description>Flynt definitely has it out for the Republicans. It&#039;s been representatives of that party that have given him the most trouble throughout his, uh, career. And it&#039;s the self-righteous faux-moral stance of members of that party that he targets, particular such incredible hyporcrites and Henry Hyde. I would not be surprised if Flynt only released Republican names. Anyway, while sex scandals are certainly bi-partisan, the TYPES of sex involved seem to be split down party lines, with Dems preferring to take their chance on the open markets while Repubs prefer the more direct financial transactions. For that reason, I&#039;m betting the vast majority, if not all, of the names come from the GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flynt definitely has it out for the Republicans. It&#8217;s been representatives of that party that have given him the most trouble throughout his, uh, career. And it&#8217;s the self-righteous faux-moral stance of members of that party that he targets, particular such incredible hyporcrites and Henry Hyde. I would not be surprised if Flynt only released Republican names. Anyway, while sex scandals are certainly bi-partisan, the TYPES of sex involved seem to be split down party lines, with Dems preferring to take their chance on the open markets while Repubs prefer the more direct financial transactions. For that reason, I&#8217;m betting the vast majority, if not all, of the names come from the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58758</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58758</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;itâ€™s stupid to argue anything with someone as intellectually dishonest as you. sarabeth and matt are stupid, stupid people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I hereby nominate this for THE TRUEST THING EVER SAID ON 1115.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>itâ€™s stupid to argue anything with someone as intellectually dishonest as you. sarabeth and matt are stupid, stupid people.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hereby nominate this for THE TRUEST THING EVER SAID ON 1115.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58757</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58757</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;in your expert opinion why do you think he wouldnâ€™t just publish Republican names&lt;/blockquote&gt;

go back and read #5.  as many times as necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>in your expert opinion why do you think he wouldnâ€™t just publish Republican names</p></blockquote>
<p>go back and read #5.  as many times as necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58756</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58756</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you deny that he would be greatly motivated to embarrass the â€œmoralâ€ party?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

the hypocrite vitter has already done that.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Anyway its stupid to argue about this&lt;/blockquote&gt;

it&#039;s stupid to argue anything with someone as intellectually dishonest as you.  sarabeth and matt are stupid, stupid people.

&lt;blockquote&gt;if theyâ€™re all Republicans, then either Iâ€™m right or Democrats are just that wholesome (cough cough)â€¦&lt;/blockquote&gt;

nothing is stopping any winger outlet, say fox news or drudge, from doing the same thing flynt is doing.  hell, they just make shit up anyway, no bounty needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Do you deny that he would be greatly motivated to embarrass the â€œmoralâ€ party?</p></blockquote>
<p>the hypocrite vitter has already done that.</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyway its stupid to argue about this</p></blockquote>
<p>it&#8217;s stupid to argue anything with someone as intellectually dishonest as you.  sarabeth and matt are stupid, stupid people.</p>
<blockquote><p>if theyâ€™re all Republicans, then either Iâ€™m right or Democrats are just that wholesome (cough cough)â€¦</p></blockquote>
<p>nothing is stopping any winger outlet, say fox news or drudge, from doing the same thing flynt is doing.  hell, they just make shit up anyway, no bounty needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimC</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58755</link>
		<dc:creator>JimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58755</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I hereby nominate #10 for THE STUPIDEST THING JIMC ANYONE HAS EVER SAID ON 1115.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you sure? ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I hereby nominate #10 for THE STUPIDEST THING JIMC ANYONE HAS EVER SAID ON 1115.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you sure? &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimC</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/comment-page-1/#comment-58754</link>
		<dc:creator>JimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/18/well-well-well-2/#comment-58754</guid>
		<description>Ok, let me frame it this way, in your expert opinion why do you think he wouldn&#039;t just publish Republican names? Do you deny that he would be greatly motivated to embarrass the &quot;moral&quot; party? 

Anyway its stupid to argue about this, we&#039;ll see when his list comes out, if they&#039;re all Republicans, then either I&#039;m right or Democrats are just &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;that &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;wholesome (cough cough)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let me frame it this way, in your expert opinion why do you think he wouldn&#8217;t just publish Republican names? Do you deny that he would be greatly motivated to embarrass the &#8220;moral&#8221; party? </p>
<p>Anyway its stupid to argue about this, we&#8217;ll see when his list comes out, if they&#8217;re all Republicans, then either I&#8217;m right or Democrats are just <strong><em>that </em></strong>wholesome (cough cough)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

