<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Rockin&#8217; Loud But You Ain&#8217;t Sayin&#8217; Nothin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/comment-page-1/#comment-57769</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/#comment-57769</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That John Solomon interview with Edwardâ€™s hairstylist got yaâ€™ll kinda mad huh?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i&#039;m sure in your addled mind, this is irrelevant, but this was written well before that, and has nothing to do with obama&#039;s empty rhetoric.  i&#039;m not sure why obama supporters can&#039;t understand that people can criticize obama independent of their support for another candidate or even another party.  it&#039;s insane.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And ask yourselves, if Iâ€™m so cowardly and dishonest, why are you begging for my attention?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

you decided to write about things we wrote here.  when engaged, you purposefully misrepresented our arguments.  i broke it down for you, and offered you a chance to make a real case on my site.  you accepted and told me you&#039;d be in touch.  [Its more than fair, it&#039;s quite generous. I&#039;ll be in touch.]  you then went silent.  i didn&#039;t beg you for anything.  i&#039;m calling you a coward because no other word covers it.  you simply can&#039;t engage on the merits, so you hide behind peripheral arguments and misconstrue everything else.  you&#039;re a coward and you&#039;re dishonest.  

what&#039;s really funny is that sarabeth called this one perfectly.  i thought that there was no way you would be this much of a bitch.  honestly, i can&#039;t believe anyone is.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Look, you canâ€™t fuck with me. Go play somewhere. Iâ€™m busy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i can&#039;t fuck with you because you&#039;re hiding.  i&#039;m embarrassed for you.  i&#039;ve never seen someone back down from an argument like this in the 4 years i&#039;ve been doing this.  i didn&#039;t even know it was possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That John Solomon interview with Edwardâ€™s hairstylist got yaâ€™ll kinda mad huh?</p></blockquote>
<p>i&#8217;m sure in your addled mind, this is irrelevant, but this was written well before that, and has nothing to do with obama&#8217;s empty rhetoric.  i&#8217;m not sure why obama supporters can&#8217;t understand that people can criticize obama independent of their support for another candidate or even another party.  it&#8217;s insane.</p>
<blockquote><p>And ask yourselves, if Iâ€™m so cowardly and dishonest, why are you begging for my attention?</p></blockquote>
<p>you decided to write about things we wrote here.  when engaged, you purposefully misrepresented our arguments.  i broke it down for you, and offered you a chance to make a real case on my site.  you accepted and told me you&#8217;d be in touch.  [Its more than fair, it's quite generous. I'll be in touch.]  you then went silent.  i didn&#8217;t beg you for anything.  i&#8217;m calling you a coward because no other word covers it.  you simply can&#8217;t engage on the merits, so you hide behind peripheral arguments and misconstrue everything else.  you&#8217;re a coward and you&#8217;re dishonest.  </p>
<p>what&#8217;s really funny is that sarabeth called this one perfectly.  i thought that there was no way you would be this much of a bitch.  honestly, i can&#8217;t believe anyone is.</p>
<blockquote><p>Look, you canâ€™t fuck with me. Go play somewhere. Iâ€™m busy.</p></blockquote>
<p>i can&#8217;t fuck with you because you&#8217;re hiding.  i&#8217;m embarrassed for you.  i&#8217;ve never seen someone back down from an argument like this in the 4 years i&#8217;ve been doing this.  i didn&#8217;t even know it was possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnA</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/comment-page-1/#comment-57768</link>
		<dc:creator>dnA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/#comment-57768</guid>
		<description>That John Solomon interview with Edward&#039;s hairstylist got ya&#039;ll kinda mad huh?

Oh and uh, Sarabeth, I didn&#039;t know you were white..while I don&#039;t take anything back, I notice you chose to focus on my criticism of your &quot;observation&quot;(projection), rather than the point you were arguing, which is that &quot;Everyone&quot; in America knows there is no military solution in Iraq. Except that&#039;s what everyone who listens to Rush Limbaugh and watches Fox news is saying and thinking. And as for racist and sexist, don&#039;t you guys link to Byron Crawford?

And ask yourselves, if I&#039;m so cowardly and dishonest, why are you begging for my attention? Why would you be so clearly interested in engaging me?

Look, you can&#039;t fuck with me. Go play somewhere. I&#039;m busy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That John Solomon interview with Edward&#8217;s hairstylist got ya&#8217;ll kinda mad huh?</p>
<p>Oh and uh, Sarabeth, I didn&#8217;t know you were white..while I don&#8217;t take anything back, I notice you chose to focus on my criticism of your &#8220;observation&#8221;(projection), rather than the point you were arguing, which is that &#8220;Everyone&#8221; in America knows there is no military solution in Iraq. Except that&#8217;s what everyone who listens to Rush Limbaugh and watches Fox news is saying and thinking. And as for racist and sexist, don&#8217;t you guys link to Byron Crawford?</p>
<p>And ask yourselves, if I&#8217;m so cowardly and dishonest, why are you begging for my attention? Why would you be so clearly interested in engaging me?</p>
<p>Look, you can&#8217;t fuck with me. Go play somewhere. I&#8217;m busy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/comment-page-1/#comment-57757</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2007/07/05/you-rockin-loud-but-you-aint-sayin-nothin/#comment-57757</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t say I found that blogger&#039;s silence very strange.  It pretty much fits my very low opinion of his honesty, intellectual and otherwise.

On June 19, I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1115.org/2007/06/19/political-flatulence/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;At some point, Sen. Obama, sex appeal is not enough. At some point itâ€™s not about style, style, style, itâ€™s about substance, substance, substance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s pretty clear what I&#039;m alleging there -- that Obama is about style, rather than substance.

By way of &lt;a href=&quot;http://halfricanrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/06/liberal-blog-lambastes-obama-for.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rebutting&lt;/a&gt; this baseless allegation, this blogger twit accuses me of having the white-woman-for-black-man hots for Obama:
&lt;blockquote&gt;But more to the point, has anyone else seen the Obama campaign focus on his &quot;sex appeal&quot;? This criticism has far more to do with her perception of Obama as physically attractive and her association of blackness with sexuality than it has to do with the candidate himself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What racist, sexist shit is &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;?

And what sense does it even make to say that I think that Obama lacks substance because I&#039;m helplessly hypnotized by his sexiness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say I found that blogger&#8217;s silence very strange.  It pretty much fits my very low opinion of his honesty, intellectual and otherwise.</p>
<p>On June 19, I <a href="http://www.1115.org/2007/06/19/political-flatulence/" rel="nofollow">wrote</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>At some point, Sen. Obama, sex appeal is not enough. At some point itâ€™s not about style, style, style, itâ€™s about substance, substance, substance.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty clear what I&#8217;m alleging there &#8212; that Obama is about style, rather than substance.</p>
<p>By way of <a href="http://halfricanrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/06/liberal-blog-lambastes-obama-for.html" rel="nofollow">rebutting</a> this baseless allegation, this blogger twit accuses me of having the white-woman-for-black-man hots for Obama:</p>
<blockquote><p>But more to the point, has anyone else seen the Obama campaign focus on his &#8220;sex appeal&#8221;? This criticism has far more to do with her perception of Obama as physically attractive and her association of blackness with sexuality than it has to do with the candidate himself.</p></blockquote>
<p>What racist, sexist shit is <em>that</em>?</p>
<p>And what sense does it even make to say that I think that Obama lacks substance because I&#8217;m helplessly hypnotized by his sexiness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

