Comments on: Proposed, Seconded, Shot Down. Next? http://www.1115.org/2007/02/23/proposed-seconded-shot-down-next/ west coast cap peelers Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:18:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: sarabeth http://www.1115.org/2007/02/23/proposed-seconded-shot-down-next/comment-page-1/#comment-46418 sarabeth Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:19:32 +0000 http://www.1115.org/2007/02/23/proposed-seconded-shot-down-next/#comment-46418 <blockquote>I wouldn’t put it past Bush to deliberately set up a situation where soldiers’ lives were lost because of the resolution</blockquote> Would that be very different from the situation that exists today?

I wouldn’t put it past Bush to deliberately set up a situation where soldiers’ lives were lost because of the resolution

Would that be very different from the situation that exists today?

]]> By: Heraldblog http://www.1115.org/2007/02/23/proposed-seconded-shot-down-next/comment-page-1/#comment-46417 Heraldblog Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:21:40 +0000 http://www.1115.org/2007/02/23/proposed-seconded-shot-down-next/#comment-46417 Murtha's proposal was probably too clever. Yes, it puts Bush on the defensive. But it could easily tie the military's hands, and I wouldn't put it past Bush to deliberately set up a situation where soldiers' lives were lost because of the resolution. Never forget the law of unintended consequences. Murtha’s proposal was probably too clever. Yes, it puts Bush on the defensive. But it could easily tie the military’s hands, and I wouldn’t put it past Bush to deliberately set up a situation where soldiers’ lives were lost because of the resolution. Never forget the law of unintended consequences.

]]>