Iraq And Common Sense
by sarabeth at 6:00 am on January 31st, 2007 in Iraq WarAP has a story today which manages to put into sharp focus exactly why we are in such a badly messed up situation in Iraq. In a nutshell, it’s because the people we have had running the show and making the basic decisions (from the very beginning right up till now) have suffered from a complete – sorry, COMPLETE – lack of common sense.
Training the police is as important to stabilizing Iraq as standing up an army there, but the United States has botched the job by assigning the wrong agencies to the task, two members of the Iraq Study Group say.
“The police training system has not gone well,” former Rep. Lee Hamilton, who co-chaired the bipartisan commission, said in remarks prepared for delivery Wednesday to the Senate Judiciary Committee. He was joined in his statements by another member of the study group, Edwin Meese III, who was attorney general during the Reagan administration.
The U.S. erred by first assigning the task of shaping the judicial system in a largely lawless country to the State Department and private contractors who “did not have the expertise or the manpower to get the job done,” Hamilton and Meese said in testimony obtained by The Associated Press.
In 2004, the mission was assigned to the Defense Department, which devoted more money to the task. But department officials also were insufficiently trained for the job, Hamilton and Meese said.
As a result, Iraq has little if any on-the-street law enforcement personnel or a functioning judicial system free of corruption, they said.
Justice Department officials, they said, should lead the work of transforming the system. Police executives and supervisors should replace the military police personnel now assigned.
How completely clueless do you have to be when it doesn’t strike you for almost four years that police training is a job best accomplished by law enforcement professionals?
And there have, of course, been enough stories about how every other aspect of our vaunted reconstruction effort in Iraq was managed in the same way.
Think for a minute how different the attitude of the average Iraqi would have been towards US forces in Iraq if we had actually built those schools, restored electricity and power, restored law and order before the insurgency got under way. Think for a minute how the insurgency might have gone initially if we had had the active support of the average Iraqi, instead of their simmering resentment.
At the risk of sounding sexist, I cannot help feeling that if only we had put women in charge, things would be very different in Iraq today.
jeremy wrote:
I wonder why you think that is. Why would a woman be any better than at least a capable male president, assuming that his head is not shrouded by his own anus?
Posted 01 Feb 2007 at 2:55 pm ¶
sarabeth wrote:
C’mon, everybody knows women are blessed with oodles of common sense.
Posted 01 Feb 2007 at 3:51 pm ¶
jamie beth wrote:
ok, here we go….i think everyone knows i’m post feminist in the sense that i believe in equality, not women’s’ rights and i do believe that the sexes have differences, meaning that men and women are EQUAL, not the SAME. whether you are talking common sense or just plain pissing contests, women approach things differently. i venture to say that there are far fewer female megalomaniacs than male megalomaniacs, at least history has shown us that all megalomaniac rulers have been male (unless i’m missing someone). so, from my stand point, everything, absolutely everything would be different if a woman were in charge. would it be better? i can’t say. but it would be different. and prettier.
Posted 01 Feb 2007 at 6:51 pm ¶
sarabeth wrote:
oh dear! devil’s advocate time…
to be fair, maybe female megalomaniacs have just been deprived of equal opportunity? in other words, far fewer women in charge has translated into far fewer megalomaniacs, but the propensity towards megalomania could well be the same?
India’s Indira Gandhi?
Posted 01 Feb 2007 at 7:20 pm ¶
matt wrote:
thatcher wasn’t exactly a picnic either.
Posted 01 Feb 2007 at 7:25 pm ¶
jamie beth wrote:
i don’t think either qualify as true megalos…do they? i agree that it MIGHT just be less opportunity, but something in my girl-gut tells me otherwise.
Posted 01 Feb 2007 at 8:15 pm ¶
sarabeth wrote:
I hadn’t realized this before, but guess who used to be in charge of the training program for the Iraqi army and police? None other than Bush’s knight in shining armor, the one who’s now going to ride to the rescue and set everything to rights: Gen. David Petraeus.
Posted 02 Feb 2007 at 7:20 am ¶