<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Good Start</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2006/12/28/a-good-start/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/12/28/a-good-start/</link>
	<description>west coast cap peelers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:46:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/12/28/a-good-start/comment-page-1/#comment-35116</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/12/28/a-good-start/#comment-35116</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Before giving him your endorsement, please try to have some direct dialogue with the man, or at least speak with a handful of people who have interacted with Edwards.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think I was pretty clear in what I said.  Clark isn&#039;t going to run, and if I&#039;m wrong and he is, his lack of signals (including to me, a donor in the last cycle) is a serious problem.

As far as Edwards, he&#039;s simply the only one of the announced/probable candidates who is &lt;em&gt;acting like a Democrat&lt;/em&gt;.  If not after an election where being a Democrat was a very big benefit, then when would Clinton/Obama/Vilsack/Biden etc think that pushing Democratic ideals was a good idea?

And if you have thoughts on Edwards from a first hand meeting with him, I invite you to write them up, I&#039;d be happy to post them on the main page here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Before giving him your endorsement, please try to have some direct dialogue with the man, or at least speak with a handful of people who have interacted with Edwards.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think I was pretty clear in what I said.  Clark isn&#8217;t going to run, and if I&#8217;m wrong and he is, his lack of signals (including to me, a donor in the last cycle) is a serious problem.</p>
<p>As far as Edwards, he&#8217;s simply the only one of the announced/probable candidates who is <em>acting like a Democrat</em>.  If not after an election where being a Democrat was a very big benefit, then when would Clinton/Obama/Vilsack/Biden etc think that pushing Democratic ideals was a good idea?</p>
<p>And if you have thoughts on Edwards from a first hand meeting with him, I invite you to write them up, I&#8217;d be happy to post them on the main page here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bv stiznan</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/12/28/a-good-start/comment-page-1/#comment-35114</link>
		<dc:creator>bv stiznan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/12/28/a-good-start/#comment-35114</guid>
		<description>Before giving him your endorsement, please try to have some direct dialogue with the man, or at least speak with a handful of people who have interacted with Edwards.  I participated in a luncheon and discussion with Edwards and saw nothing that suggested he wasn&#039;t a completely superficial, celebrity-seeking politician completely unwilling to open discussion on any topic.  Stick with Wes Clark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before giving him your endorsement, please try to have some direct dialogue with the man, or at least speak with a handful of people who have interacted with Edwards.  I participated in a luncheon and discussion with Edwards and saw nothing that suggested he wasn&#8217;t a completely superficial, celebrity-seeking politician completely unwilling to open discussion on any topic.  Stick with Wes Clark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
