Strange Days

by matt at 6:00 am on September 15th, 2006 in '06/'08 Campaigns, Ahhhnold: Turd, Bad Dems

“I wouldn’t urinate down his throat if his heart was on fire.” - James Carville on Nader

When Jason and I started this site in 2003, two things drove us: the Bush administration’s mis-governance and the gubernatorial recall election in California. With our state still dealing with the fallout from the 2000 energy crisis, brought on by Republican deregulation of the state’s power generation and transmission system, residents saw their rates spike as governor Gray Davis was forced to sign emergency contracts at inflated prices just to keep the lights on. Sensing an opportunity to flip the governorship of the nation’s largest (and richest) state, the President and his advisors refused to expedite Federal Energy Regulatory Commission investigations and relief in the hopes that Davis would be so weakened that he would lose his seat in the 2002 election. Owing to an exceptionally weak challenge from Republican Bill Simon in that election, Davis won a second term, but still-high power bills and an unforgiving public left him mortally wounded.

Even after California Republican Congressman Darrell Issa set the wheels in motion for a nearly unprecedented recall election, Davis was favored to hold and serve out his four-year term, one he earned just months prior. That is until Issa cried his way through a press conference announcing that he was withdrawing from the race to make way for Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Schwarzenegger, who had long toyed with a run for office but shied away from the long and arduous campaigns, now needed to mug for the cameras and play to disaffected voters for just two months. And despite being dogged by sexual harassment charges, numerous verbal gaffes and running on a platform that consisted of “I’ll figure out how to govern once I get elected,” Schwarzenegger rode his movie catch-phrases and psuedo-tough-guy bravado straight into the governor’s mansion. It was little comfort for Davis when FERC finally levied fines against Enron and others for defrauding the state out of billions.

Schwarzenegger then proceeded to bring K Street to Sacramento, taking pay-for-play to a new level. As he talked about reform out of one side of his mouth, he was soliciting huge contributions from corporations seeking to do business with the state out of the other. He launched one of the largest power grabs in American politics with his 2005 special election, costing the state and local governments millions of dollars. His rise to power and exercise thereof was not only caustic, it was embarrassing. Take Carville’s feelings toward Nader, multiply them a few times, and you’ll have a rough approximation of my view of Schwarzenegger.

Yet if California’s election were held today, I would leave the box next to Schwarzenegger’s challenger, Democrat Phil Angelides, blank.

phil_quark.jpg

One year ago, Schwarzenegger’s approval rating was 31%, half of what it had been earlier that same year. His vanity special election was headed for a brutal defeat on all measures, thanks to staunch opposition from teachers, police, nurses and prison guards. Democratic prospects for reclaiming the governor’s office looked bright. Until the primary battle between Angelides and Steve Westly turned into the kind of fratricidal disaster that even the Swift Boat fools couldn’t hope to replicate. Radio and TV ads with wild accusations ran so often I had to cut back on media consumption. For two men who agreed on almost all issues, Westly and Angelides played mutually assured destruction better (or at least more extensively) than Saint Ronald Reagan ever did. I voted, electability in mind, for Westly, but by then it made little difference that Angelides won by a few points, the bitter primary campaign would have made it nearly impossible for either man to win the general election.

It’s one thing for me to throw in the towel on the race, something else entirely for Angelides’ own campaign to act as if they’ve done the same thing. As Schwarzenegger widens his lead, Angelides is just nowhere. He has failed to rally his base or reach out to the squishy middle. His communications game has been close to non-existent. And in the latest bit of incompetence, his aides hacked into Schwarzenegger’s server, downloaded audio files and released them to the media in an attempt to embarrass the governor - an action akin to a multi-billionaire robbing a bank.

Believe me, back in 2003 I’d have promised to donate to, work for, and vote for anyone running against Schwarzenegger. If Angelides can’t run a better campaign than this, he doesn’t deserve my vote, and unless something drastic happens, he won’t get it. One look at the polls tells me I’m not alone. Maybe I would pull out the old fire extinguisher…

Comments

  1. InTheMiddle wrote:

    There was only one republican that seemed better than Arnie during the special elections, but he didn’t have much money to campaign. The dems at the time (as I watched the televised debates) were bent on giving illegal mexicans driver licenses and other state money rights, which upset the southern half of California. Arnie won on 1) Name, 2) Repealing the car tax, 3) Not letting the driver license thing become a right. Also, the polls had him losing that election, too–I have noticed that California polls are never right.

    Also, it wasn’t the nurses/police/fireman etc SPECIFICALLY against Arnie in the last prop votes: it was the unions representing them. The teachers/nurses etc you saw on tv ads against him were paid by the unions. The props were just saying that unions have to tell their members where the politcal contributions are going, and that if they don’t contribute, they won’t lose their union rights–as it still is now. The whole problem with that election is that I never saw any ads from Arnie explaining what the props were–the tv was flooded with teachers and fireman union members talking about how money was going to be taken away from them–when in fact not.

    Arnie was much better than the last gov, thank god. And Arnie pulling businesses back into California is a good thing, not a bad thing. THe more businessses stay: more jobs, more taxes for a broke government.

  2. matt wrote:

    There was only one republican that seemed better than Arnie during the special elections, but he didn’t have much money to campaign.

    you probably mean Tom McClintock. as if california voter would elect someone that far to the right.

    The dems at the time (as I watched the televised debates) were bent on giving illegal mexicans driver licenses and other state money rights, which upset the southern half of California.

    they weren’t “bent” on it. they were trying to solve a problem they inherited from the previous republican governor..

    Arnie won on 1) Name, 2) Repealing the car tax, 3) Not letting the driver license thing become a right.

    repealing the “car tax” punched a $4 billion hole in state and municipal budgets here. some places still haven’t recovered.

    Also, the polls had him losing that election, too–I have noticed that California polls are never right.

    you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. please stop talking out of your ass.

    The October 2003 Field Poll:

    Likely voters are now disposed to vote Yes on the Davis recall by a 57% to 39% margin. This compares to a 53% Yes and 43% No margin of support found in the poll’s Sept. 25 – 28 interviewing period, and 55% Yes and 40% No result in early September.
    • Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger has opened up a ten-point lead over Lt. Governor Cruz
    Bustamante in the election to replace Davis, should the Governor be recalled. Schwarzenegger
    is now preferred by 36% of likely voters and Bustamante by 26%.

    what were you saying again?

    Also, it wasn’t the nurses/police/fireman etc SPECIFICALLY against Arnie in the last prop votes: it was the unions representing them.

    an who’s in the unions?

    your understanding of the special election is a mess. union dues were just one question on the ballot. past that, union members can already opt out of political activity.

    there were other questions such as teacher tenure, absurd state budget caps, a sneaky redistricting scheme, and parental notification on abortion. they all lost.

    The whole problem with that election is that I never saw any ads from Arnie explaining what the props were–the tv was flooded with teachers and fireman union members talking about how money was going to be taken away from them–when in fact not.

    you didn’t watch very closely then.

    Arnie was much better than the last gov, thank god. And Arnie pulling businesses back into California is a good thing, not a bad thing. THe more businessses stay: more jobs, more taxes for a broke government.

    proof please.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*