Remembering September 11, 2001

I want you to ask yourself two questions today.

Based on everything you have seen President Bush say and do in the last five years, do you think he has felt one single moment of compassion for the victims (as you and I understand the term, not as Tony Snow or Scott McClellan might define it)?

What do you think you can do, today and in the future, to honor the memory of the victims and the heroes?

And I want you to make yourself a promise.

Whatever you came up with for the second question, promise yourself that you will do it.

Whatever our government does, or claims it is doing, or doesn’t do, to fight terrorism, this is how you and I can fight it. And who is to say that in the ultimate analysis our efforts will not be more important than the government’s?

Comments

  1. jamie beth says:

    as all other september 11ths since 2001 i am spending the day walking around manhattan. i started the morning with a walk in riverside park and ran straight into a fireman’s memorial. i will now take the train downtown and wander home….i don’t know how this honors anyone’s memories except my own, but i know it’s important to me to “be a part of the city” today.

  2. jamie beth says:

    i forgot to mention i will be wearing my “i do not consent” shirt:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamiebeths/37718705/in/set-833035/

  3. shmedd says:

    I’ll be taking my 5 year old daughter (6 months old on 9/11) to our front porch and lighting a couple of candles and trying to explain to her what/how this happened. I don’t expect it to be easy but I also feel it’s important that she get a sense of the magnitude of the tragedy and why we should remember.

  4. jamie beth says:

    report from the site:
    it’s a beautiful day in manhattan. a little cooler and breezier than it was in 2001. lower manahttan is an interesting mix of people today:
    (1) survivors/family members/firemen/public here to commemorate the day
    (2) tourists
    (3) people here to work as they would be on any other day
    (4) protesters
    all in all, a fairly typical day in new york, i would say.

  5. sac says:

    Nice, uh, shirt.

  6. matt says:

    is that a rack joke?

  7. jamie beth says:

    i think it is …. i wasn’t going to say anything, but as my big brother, can you please defend me?
    thanks.

  8. sac says:

    No, I simply forgot how to spell “shirt” for a brief moment, hence the “uh.”

    Alright, it was a rack joke.

  9. matt says:

    Alright, it was a rack joke.

    thin ice. although, she did open the door…

  10. sac says:

    Also, I had no idea you two were related. Even so, daaaamn.

    I kid.

  11. sarabeth says:

    Your sense of humor seems to be just about on par with that of George Bush.

    Also, I had no idea you two were related.

    I don’t see how anyone who claims to read this site regularly can say that. It has come up repeatedly.

  12. matt says:

    I don’t see how anyone who claims to read this site regularly can say that.

    i’m sure he was kidding

  13. sarabeth says:

    like I said, what he calls a sense of humor is anything but.

  14. sac says:

    Oh for chrissakes.

  15. jamie beth says:

    thin ice. although, she did open the door…

    um, sara beth? anyone? help here? i OPENED the door by having big boobs?! that is NOT defending your sister, matt.

  16. sarabeth says:

    If he had a sac, he would apologize, I’m sure.

  17. sac says:

    Ha. I admit, I can be juvenile. Sorry if I offended thee.

  18. jamie beth says:

    apology accepted. done.

  19. sarabeth says:

    Ha ha ha. That’s an apology?

  20. sac says:

    To paraphrase Dr. Frank -n-Furter: I wasn’t apologizing to YOU.

  21. sarabeth says:

    Since my IQ is greater than my age, I’m perfectly aware of that.

    So now you’re trying to say that I can only comment on things addressed specifically to me?

  22. sac says:

    In this case, yeah. Why should you question someone else’s acceptance of an apology? Also, that Rocky Horror line popped into my head as soon as I read your comment.

  23. sarabeth says:

    If you had an IQ greater than your age, you would realize that I posted my comment before I saw Jamie’s acceptance.

    In this case, yeah.

    What the hell does that even mean?

  24. sac says:

    Sorry, didn’t read the time stamp, but it did appear after.

    Please continue personal attacks.

  25. tom says:

    you should see matt’s rack.

  26. sarabeth says:

    Please continue personal attacks.

    Sure thing. And you feel free any time to tell me how I’m allowed to behave in my own house.

    If you say idiotic things, I will call you an idiot. Every time.

    The fact that it was a quote from Rocky Horror and it popped into your head doesn’t change the fact that it was a totally idiotic thing to say.

    Also, when comments are flying back and forth at the speed they were yesterday afternoon, one doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to realize that messages sometimes get crossed. Especially since it had already happened before in this very thread, when Jamie called on me to help after I had stepped in. When it didn’t make sense that I would question the apology after Jamie had accepted it, the obvious thing to do was check the time stamp. But you, of course, were too busy taking umbrage.

    Maybe, just maybe, if you can’t take a simple “Ha ha ha. That’s an apology?” or an “If you had an IQ greater than your age, you would realize that I posted my comment before I saw Jamie’s acceptance”, you should think twice in the future about making rack jokes at someone else’s expense?

  27. sac says:

    I told you to continue personal attacks. You did so. Apparently I can tell you what to do in your own house.

  28. sarabeth says:

    If you see the last comment as a personal attack, you really have no business making the joke at Jamie’s expense that you did.

  29. sac says:

    Clarify the meaning of “idiot” for me, then.

  30. jamie says:

    sorry to say, this is not the first time my rack has caused such a ruckus. let’s put this one to bed. i’m happily married and there are plenty of more important things to argue about. sara beth, thanks for fighting the good fight. matt, thanks for nothing!

  31. sarabeth says:

    You’re welcome. It was interesting to be a damsel in shining armor.

  32. sac says:

    I can’t tell you how many bad jokes are running through my head right now, like this one:

    I, too, would like to put this one to bed, as well as the other one.

    See, I’m just used to being good-naturedly crass online, and getting the same in return. If you read my old blog, you’d find that was pretty much the entire content of it, from commenters, as well. I forget not everyone shares that sensibility.

  33. sarabeth says:

    See, I’m just used to being good-naturedly crass online, and getting the same in return.

    If you’re used to it, how come you have such a thin skin?

  34. sac says:

    I don’t have a thin skin. You guys are the ones who launch into personal attacks when you don’t agree with something I say. Not every time, but enough that it gets noticed. I think the only time I ever did around here is when I called Matt an asshole. I don’t really care that I get called an idiot.

    Also, the “good-naturedly” is the key word. It was all in fun. I can’t say there’s anything inherently fun around here, not that that’s a bad thing as this is a political site.

  35. matt says:

    ok, that’s more than enough on this. don’t make me post pictures of someone else’s rack.

    I can’t say there’s anything inherently fun around here,

    now that offends me.