<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Path to 9/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20302</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20302</guid>
		<description>Correction: Disney actually opened at $29.40 it seems, and moved up soon thereafter to the $29.70 I reported earlier.  Closed at $29.77.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: Disney actually opened at $29.40 it seems, and moved up soon thereafter to the $29.70 I reported earlier.  Closed at $29.77.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20290</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20290</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Censorship: The act, process, or practice of censoring.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ha.  you must have missed the day in elementary school where they taught that you can&#039;t define a word by using that word.  only governments can censor anything.  a loosely aligned group of democrats can&#039;t censor anything, which you should know because you called it:

&lt;blockquote&gt;he Democratic Party is like a wounded animal that has been cornered and is lashing out in self-defense.

Its grip on legitimacy is so fragile it can be devastated by a made-for-TV movie.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;The point that you didnâ€™t get because you are so caught up in liberalism vs. conservatism is that the Demâ€™s feel the movie could ruin their political future.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

and?  

when people make legitimate criticisms about democrats, that&#039;s all in the game.  i do it quite often myself.  when one of the big three networks contracts a hack to make shit up, that&#039;s something that people on both sides of the aisle should oppose.  and some of the most determined dem bashers did just that (brent bozell, bill bennett, etc)

&lt;blockquote&gt;And what does the Reagan miniseries have to do with it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

the right exploded with bile over that, also before it was shown.  they even stopped cbs from showing it.  maybe you aren&#039;t bright enough to see that parallel.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;You assume I am a Republican because I disagreed with you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i could care less what party you claim.  you arguments are what troubles me.  who cares if the dems are &quot;weak.&quot;  what are they &quot;weak&quot; on?  ethics? governance? their portrayal in the &lt;em&gt;librul&lt;/em&gt; media?

&lt;blockquote&gt;I love these little liberal sites that shun themselves from the other side of the fence and mud sling. It shows how close-minded you are. It especially shows since you condemn every conservative newspaper/tv news station there is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

see, the funny thing is that you are either obviously new here or are incapable of spotting patterns.  i don&#039;t care about someone&#039;s bias, unless it alters the facts.  everyone is entitled to their point of view, but not their own facts.  this is something abc doesn&#039;t get, and they&#039;ll pay a price for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Censorship: The act, process, or practice of censoring.</p></blockquote>
<p>ha.  you must have missed the day in elementary school where they taught that you can&#8217;t define a word by using that word.  only governments can censor anything.  a loosely aligned group of democrats can&#8217;t censor anything, which you should know because you called it:</p>
<blockquote><p>he Democratic Party is like a wounded animal that has been cornered and is lashing out in self-defense.</p>
<p>Its grip on legitimacy is so fragile it can be devastated by a made-for-TV movie.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The point that you didnâ€™t get because you are so caught up in liberalism vs. conservatism is that the Demâ€™s feel the movie could ruin their political future.</p></blockquote>
<p>and?  </p>
<p>when people make legitimate criticisms about democrats, that&#8217;s all in the game.  i do it quite often myself.  when one of the big three networks contracts a hack to make shit up, that&#8217;s something that people on both sides of the aisle should oppose.  and some of the most determined dem bashers did just that (brent bozell, bill bennett, etc)</p>
<blockquote><p>And what does the Reagan miniseries have to do with it?</p></blockquote>
<p>the right exploded with bile over that, also before it was shown.  they even stopped cbs from showing it.  maybe you aren&#8217;t bright enough to see that parallel.  </p>
<blockquote><p>You assume I am a Republican because I disagreed with you?</p></blockquote>
<p>i could care less what party you claim.  you arguments are what troubles me.  who cares if the dems are &#8220;weak.&#8221;  what are they &#8220;weak&#8221; on?  ethics? governance? their portrayal in the <em>librul</em> media?</p>
<blockquote><p>I love these little liberal sites that shun themselves from the other side of the fence and mud sling. It shows how close-minded you are. It especially shows since you condemn every conservative newspaper/tv news station there is.</p></blockquote>
<p>see, the funny thing is that you are either obviously new here or are incapable of spotting patterns.  i don&#8217;t care about someone&#8217;s bias, unless it alters the facts.  everyone is entitled to their point of view, but not their own facts.  this is something abc doesn&#8217;t get, and they&#8217;ll pay a price for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheMiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20231</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheMiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20231</guid>
		<description>Censorship: The act, process, or practice of censoring. 

Thus, to explain it to simple minds: The Dems want to censor the movie, or parts of it. That is a process, therefore, censorship applies.

The point that you didn&#039;t get because you are so caught up in liberalism vs. conservatism is that the Dem&#039;s feel the movie could ruin their political future. A dramatic tv movie should have not effect on any powerful party, unless it was weak. The Dems are weak--even some of them admit it--and this would hurt them.

And what does the Reagan miniseries have to do with it? You assume I am a Republican because I disagreed with you? I love these little liberal sites that shun themselves from the other side of the fence and mud sling. It shows how close-minded you are. It especially shows since you condemn every conservative newspaper/tv news station there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Censorship: The act, process, or practice of censoring. </p>
<p>Thus, to explain it to simple minds: The Dems want to censor the movie, or parts of it. That is a process, therefore, censorship applies.</p>
<p>The point that you didn&#8217;t get because you are so caught up in liberalism vs. conservatism is that the Dem&#8217;s feel the movie could ruin their political future. A dramatic tv movie should have not effect on any powerful party, unless it was weak. The Dems are weak&#8211;even some of them admit it&#8211;and this would hurt them.</p>
<p>And what does the Reagan miniseries have to do with it? You assume I am a Republican because I disagreed with you? I love these little liberal sites that shun themselves from the other side of the fence and mud sling. It shows how close-minded you are. It especially shows since you condemn every conservative newspaper/tv news station there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20190</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20190</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The desperate censorship of this is not the sign of a healthy, confident political party.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

please learn the definition of censorship before you use the word again.  you&#039;re embarrassing yourself.

&lt;blockquote&gt;It is the sign of a movement that is literally fighting for its life. The Democratic Party is like a wounded animal that has been cornered and is lashing out in self-defense.

Its grip on legitimacy is so fragile it can be devastated by a made-for-TV movie.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

so now it isn&#039;t about the merits of their claims, but the standing of their organization?

maybe you weren&#039;t paying attention when CBS was planning to run their Reagan miniseries a few years ago, but don&#039;t let that stop your expert analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The desperate censorship of this is not the sign of a healthy, confident political party.</p></blockquote>
<p>please learn the definition of censorship before you use the word again.  you&#8217;re embarrassing yourself.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is the sign of a movement that is literally fighting for its life. The Democratic Party is like a wounded animal that has been cornered and is lashing out in self-defense.</p>
<p>Its grip on legitimacy is so fragile it can be devastated by a made-for-TV movie.</p></blockquote>
<p>so now it isn&#8217;t about the merits of their claims, but the standing of their organization?</p>
<p>maybe you weren&#8217;t paying attention when CBS was planning to run their Reagan miniseries a few years ago, but don&#8217;t let that stop your expert analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheMiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20188</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheMiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20188</guid>
		<description>The desperate censorship of this is not the sign of a healthy, confident political party. It is the sign of a movement that is literally fighting for its life. The Democratic Party is like a wounded animal that has been cornered and is lashing out in self-defense.

Its grip on legitimacy is so fragile it can be devastated by a made-for-TV movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The desperate censorship of this is not the sign of a healthy, confident political party. It is the sign of a movement that is literally fighting for its life. The Democratic Party is like a wounded animal that has been cornered and is lashing out in self-defense.</p>
<p>Its grip on legitimacy is so fragile it can be devastated by a made-for-TV movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20184</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20184</guid>
		<description>It seems to have opened at $29.70.

What do I know?

Maybe the current chairman (former Senate Majority Leader &lt;strong&gt;George Mitchell&lt;/strong&gt;) and CEO (&lt;strong&gt;Robert A. Iger&lt;/strong&gt;) will be voted chairman and CEO for life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to have opened at $29.70.</p>
<p>What do I know?</p>
<p>Maybe the current chairman (former Senate Majority Leader <strong>George Mitchell</strong>) and CEO (<strong>Robert A. Iger</strong>) will be voted chairman and CEO for life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20072</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20072</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Glad to see someone condemn Disney et all for a movie that hasnâ€™t even been shown to the public yet&lt;/blockquote&gt;

a+ for talking point fidelity.  f for idiocy.

the film was sent out for review.  people who saw it reported the lies contained.

&lt;blockquote&gt; Now I know who that liberals like you are willing to condemn anything when not having any knowledge of the subject.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

what knowledge are we lacking?

&lt;blockquote&gt;I will definitely laugh if you censor this commentâ€¦free speech, right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

this comment will be preserved for all eternity right where it is.  we&#039;re laughing at your abject stupidity.  free speech, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Glad to see someone condemn Disney et all for a movie that hasnâ€™t even been shown to the public yet</p></blockquote>
<p>a+ for talking point fidelity.  f for idiocy.</p>
<p>the film was sent out for review.  people who saw it reported the lies contained.</p>
<blockquote><p> Now I know who that liberals like you are willing to condemn anything when not having any knowledge of the subject.</p></blockquote>
<p>what knowledge are we lacking?</p>
<blockquote><p>I will definitely laugh if you censor this commentâ€¦free speech, right?</p></blockquote>
<p>this comment will be preserved for all eternity right where it is.  we&#8217;re laughing at your abject stupidity.  free speech, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheMiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-20069</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheMiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/09/10/the-path-to-911/#comment-20069</guid>
		<description>Glad to see someone condemn Disney et all for a movie that hasn&#039;t even been shown to the public yet....reminds me of when the movie The Passion of the Christ came out. Now I know who that liberals like you are willing to condemn anything when not having any knowledge of the subject. Gee, did you go to the middle east and suddenly know how to solve the whole crisis too? I will definitely laugh if you censor this comment...free speech, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see someone condemn Disney et all for a movie that hasn&#8217;t even been shown to the public yet&#8230;.reminds me of when the movie The Passion of the Christ came out. Now I know who that liberals like you are willing to condemn anything when not having any knowledge of the subject. Gee, did you go to the middle east and suddenly know how to solve the whole crisis too? I will definitely laugh if you censor this comment&#8230;free speech, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

