A Victory Lap for Broken Promises

by matt at 12:00 am on August 28th, 2006 in Katrina

“Niggaz starvin and they dyin of thirst
I bet he had to go and check on them refineries first
Makin a killin off the price of gas
He woulda been up in Connecticut twice as fast
After all that we been through, nothing’s changed
You can call Red Cross but the fact remains that:

George Bush ain’t a gold digger
But he ain’t f*ckin with no broke niggaz”
- K-OtixGeorge Bush Doesn’t Care About Black People” / (Chopped & Screwed remix)

9th ward donations

One year ago as Katrina menaced the Gulf Coast, I’m ashamed to admit that selfish thoughts ruled my mind. As I kept up with the news and weather reports, I wondered if I would ever again be able to visit the scene of so many semi-collegiate drunken nights, random hook-ups, getting booed off the karaoke stage at Cat’s Meow for a particularly awful version of “Knocking on Heaven’s Door,” and of course my epic 1991 8-ball shellacking of 3rd Bass MC Prime Minister Pete Nice at Pat O’Brien’s . My usual near-constant media monitoring unfortunately had to be placed on hold while I traveled back to Pittsburgh to help my father begin his ultimately fatal adventure with the greatest medical system in the world. I saw that Katrina hit, watched as everyone breathed a sigh of relief that the worst was averted, and cringed as the President stayed on vacation and even did his best Nero impression.

9th ward diagonal car 1

It wasn’t until I returned to California that I snapped out of my personal fog and realized the scale of the disaster and the unfolding horrors. I was physically sickened by the pictures coming out of the Superdome and Convention Center. That this was happening in the richest country the world has ever seen was not only embarrassing, it was unimaginable. But just as it was—and is—hard to comprehend the devastation of 9/11, even five years later, fully grasping the situation on the Gulf Coast was impossible for anyone not living through it.

9th ward toilets 2

Rather more tangible was the reaction of certain pundits and elected officials. What should have been a no-brainer reminder that the US is woefully unprepared for catastrophe (natural or manmade), and that class and especially race issues have been ignored for far too long instead turned into a disgusting exercise in political cover, ideological pet projects, and racist comments (both thinly-veiled and buck naked). Unfortunately for Katrina survivors, the talking heads distracting and poisoning the discourse were of the same party as those who control the federal government, and in some cases, they were in the government themselves.

9th ward house truck

This sad state of affairs produced some very negative outcomes. Right out of the gate, the President, by executive order, suspended the Davis-Bacon Act and its guarantee of local prevailing wages for companies receiving government funds for reconstruction. It was a sweet deal while it lasted for the firms (mostly Republican campaign donors) who won no-bid, cost-plus contracts. In one of the more morbid examples, Congressional Republicans, already feverishly trying to limit federal aid to the Gulf Coast, set out to find families of Katrina’s dead who were adversely affected by the Estate Tax while bodies were still floating in the flood waters. That they failed to find even one such case didn’t stop them from using Katrina in their ongoing effort to repeal the tax that only touches the super-rich.

9th ward wardrobe 3

When it became clear that there was no politically viable way around a federally-funded reconstruction program, many in Congress changed their tune from “We shouldn’t waste money rebuilding a city that will just flood again” to “We’ll send some money down there, but it’s damn sure coming out of the pot marked for poor people elsewhere.” Grudgingly, money was appropriated, but two-thirds of it remains in limbo.

9th ward 22

As for the one-third that has been transfered, it’s hard to see what good it has done on the ground. A year ago, I was torn between my family obligations and a strong desire to document the effects of Katrina. I had no idea that, as the anniversary of the storm’s landfall arrived, vast areas of New Orleans would remain in effectively the same condition they were in the day the water finally drained. With Hurricane Ernesto chasing me out of the area, I heard the administration’s rebuilding coordinator say:

There’s been an extraordinary amount of effort by the Corps of Engineers on restoring and repairing the levees, and I believe that the levees are ready for the hurricane season.

Yet the Army Corps of Engineers themselves are much less certain:

Despite aggressive efforts to repair the New Orleans levee system following the destruction of Hurricane Katrina, it isn’t clear yet whether it could withstand a hurricane with heavy storm surge this year, the head of the Army Corps of Engineers conceded Saturday.

jacob

As I walked around New Orleans’ many diverse neighborhoods, I talked with anyone who would stop for a few minutes. From well-off homeowners to artists to busboys to the homeless, unsure of where or when they would get their next meal. I learned a lot about the attitudes of the people who have chosen to return. They are deeply skeptical of the reconstruction effort. They see the speedy re-opening of I-10, but fear the readiness of the flood control system. They see businesses getting big contracts and bigger tax breaks, while they lose out on jobs rebuilding the city to undocumented workers who will work for less. They search for apartments in an area that has seen a significant portion of its housing destroyed, and wonder how they will pay inflated rents and put the pieces back together when good jobs are scarce. They note that more than half of pre-Katrina residents are still scattered throughout the country, most who are renters not entitled to much (if any) of the aid needed to start again in their home town. It was difficult to hear their stories, colored with their love for their Nawlins, its future still very much up in the air.

9th ward this was home

But Americans love them some anniversaries, whether positive or catastrophic, so the clown show is firing on all cylinders. The media, surprisingly good in the immediate aftermath of Katrina, has again fallen down on the job. Maybe Anderson Cooper, who owes his extended prime time slot on CNN to his ability to cry and get angry on camera a year ago, has stayed on the case, but few others have done much since then. I’m cynical almost to a fault (and when the media is the subject, past a fault), but based on the stories I have seen, I thought that my window of opportunity to see the results of Katrina’s wrath had closed. This based on reports like: “Hey look, Wal-Mart reopened,” or “The XYZ hotel, closed since August of 2005, is now welcoming guests once again” on cable news and elsewhere. While technically true, this coverage could not be more misleading. When Education Secretary Margaret Spellings breezed through last week, she brought with her $60 million in aid from foreign countries. While the local papers and some sharp bloggers have been covering the devastating story of kids forced to blend in at schools far from home and the behavioral and academic problems that follow, major media outlets haven’t even considered the long term effect on the country in general, and the Gulf Coast in particular, as these kids grow up. Just as cross-sections of old trees can tell the tale of the environment the tree was exposed to, we will see Katrina’s mark on the kids transplanted. But it’s so much easier to send a reporter and a camera to a press conference held by an inept bureaucrat a year too late. Spellings’ counterpart at Commerce, Carlos Gutierrez, was also here to push investment in the area with a visit to a reopened Home Depot. As if the government has provided even a neutral economic environment. Gutierrez and Spellings used the media to spread a false premise: that everything is on track and everything that can be done is being done. The administration-media partnership responsible for the war in Iraq is following the same script: highlight the blips (school openings / cell phone service) and downplay the human cost.

9th ward 17

The broader reality is that areas not subject to serious flooding, like the French Quarter and the Garden District, remain shells of their former selves. Even on Bourbon Street, bars, restaurants, and strip clubs remain closed. Art galleries and boutiques on adjacent streets have signs in their windows directing the few passers-by to call if they want to buy something. The number of “for sale” signs is truly shocking, for if those most invested in New Orleans’ present don’t see a future here, who will? There is construction on Canal Street, but many buildings, even modern high rises, sport broken windows on upper floors and plywood on the lower ones. There is a critical hospital shortage, forcing those who are the sickest to leave town for proper care. Trash and debris are piled next to major streets, just blocks from downtown.

9th ward michael 1

But all of that is just the least bad part. What remains of Lakeview and the Lower 9th Ward is a national embarrassment. One year after Katrina, and some houses rest off their foundations and in the streets. Cars sit upside down or crushed, some even under buildings washed away by flood waters. Water-damaged and mud-caked objects are distributed inside houses and in yards. Block after block, the damage appears infinite. The fact that $44 billion has been released for recovery, yet the ruins of the 9th ward are allowed to stand almost frozen in time, is nothing short of disgusting. With so many of our ruling Republican majority subscribing to the “Broken Window” theory, it’s amazing that the ultimate broken window is the flood damage allowed to remain across New Orleans.

9th_ward_hole_in_roof

If you are a regular 1115 reader, you of course know that I am never at a loss for words, and if you aren’t a regular reader, the length of this post should be enough of a hint. Though I spent roughly three hours walking around the 9th ward with my camera, I can think of few things to say that aren’t more faithfully conveyed by the images. My internal voice was stuck in a loop as I carefully stepped around piles of debris: This is the third world, this is what’s left of so many broken lives, and what will become of those who called the Lower 9th home? The work suffered from my inability to concentrate, but this isn’t about art, or even journalism. It is a window for people everywhere to view what passes for reconstruction in a neighborhood few care about.

9th ward restoration

I make no apologies for the criticism Jason, Sarabeth, and I have leveled at the Bush administration. We have documented a full year’s worth of their inept, destructive, unfair and clueless reaction to the damage Katrina wrought. Often these posts have sparked arguments about who’s to blame, with readers on the other side of the aisle (or more accurately, universe) shielding the President from the brunt of the responsibility by holding up New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin and Louisiana governor Kathleen Blanco as the real villains. Look, I carry no brief for the former Republican Nagin, who comes off as an incompetent clown, unable to make up his mind or keep his feet out of his mouth. That he was just reelected in the wake of Katrina makes less sense to me than Bush’s reelection in the middle of the Iraq war. Blanco has managed to acquit herself marginally better, but is not exactly the next Democratic superstar.

9th ward 16

But it was President Bush who stood under dramatic stage lighting in an otherwise blacked-out city on September 15, 2005 and assured the nation that:

When communities are rebuilt, they must be even better and stronger than before the storm. Within the Gulf region are some of the most beautiful and historic places in America. As all of us saw on television, there’s also some deep, persistent poverty in this region, as well. That poverty has roots in a history of racial discrimination, which cut off generations from the opportunity of America. We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action. So let us restore all that we have cherished from yesterday, and let us rise above the legacy of inequality. When the streets are rebuilt, there should be many new businesses, including minority-owned businesses, along those streets. When the houses are rebuilt, more families should own, not rent, those houses. When the regional economy revives, local people should be prepared for the jobs being created.

Bush’s “bold action” with respect to the Gulf Coast was the above-mentioned suspension of the Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage protections and the naming of his chief political advisor Karl Rove to lead the reconstruction effort. To this day, nothing has been done to address the rampant poverty made worse by Katrina, and racism rages as before. Bush is right that more families should own homes, but those who rented before and lost everything are not finding it any easier to own this time around. Homeowners are being compensated for their losses, but not renters. And the path is made harder by the lack of living-wage jobs and skyrocketing rents. There was a time not long ago when Presidents were punished severely for breaking their promises.

But not only is Bush not paying a political price, he’s reaping the benefits that his policies produce. Rich or poor, black or white, everyone in New Orleans (except that idiot Rocky Vaccarella) blames the government. For a Republican party that for years has tried to sour views on Washington, that is money in the bank. And with the slow pace of reconstruction (especially the residential variety) in the areas most likely to vote Democratic, the state of Louisiana moves into the solid red electoral column. Sure he’s down a bit in the polls (though he probably would be anyway due to Iraq), but that’s a small price for a lame duck to pay for a potential realigning shift in regional politics.

9th ward 19

No one, at least no one credible, expected that 12 months would be enough to repair and rebuild from Katrina, nor is anyone blaming the administration for not having produced a miracle. But the sad truth is that this is simply not a priority for this administration. People are coming back to New Orleans, and they clearly want to reclaim their city. But it takes more money than has been released, and it takes leadership this President simply does not possess nor recognize in others. He sits idly by as the power company that serves New Orleans proper siphons profits to its holding company while threatening to declare bankruptcy and leave their hardest hit customers in the dark. Yet he’ll be in Mississippi today and here on Tuesday carrying the message that “after a slow start, we’re keeping our promise.”

One only needs to look at the state of the 9th Ward to see that, like everything else, this administration is simply not serious about governing. Gulf residents are paying an immediate price, but the rest of us, whether we know it or not, have a generational mortgage on the aftermath of the incompetence.

9th ward 29

*Notes:

The full set of my photos from the 9th Ward are here on Flickr. During my stay in New Orleans I had the opportunity to speak with and photograph some residents who have fallen on especially hard times: Jacob / Michael / Billy / Teddy.

Whether or not you agree with my thoughts on the government’s response, the photos are as real as it gets. Under normal circumstances, I couldn’t care less how many people read this site or view my photos. Writing and photography are activities I would do anyway, so it just doesn’t matter. But this is different. I gave my word to the people who took the time to speak with me that I would do whatever I could to tell their stories and expose what is really happening in New Orleans. If in reading this post and looking at my photos, you feel that they are valuable, please pass the links along to others who might be interested.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. The Tattered Coat » Still Broken on 28 Aug 2006 at 9:29 am

    [...] It’s called A Victory Lap for Broken Promises: But all of that is just the least bad part. What remains of Lakeview and the Lower 9th Ward is a national embarrassment. One year after Katrina, and some houses rest off their foundations and in the streets. Cars sit upside down or crushed, some even under buildings washed away by flood waters. Water-damaged and mud-caked objects are distributed inside houses and in yards. Block after block, the damage appears infinite. The fact that $44 billion has been released for recovery, yet the ruins of the 9th ward are allowed to stand almost frozen in time, is nothing short of disgusting. With so many of our ruling Republican majority subscribing to the “Broken Window” theory, it’s amazing that the ultimate broken window is the flood damage allowed to remain across New Orleans. [...]

  2. Lower 9th. Ward, One Year Later » Gallinvanting on 28 Aug 2006 at 9:51 am

    [...] 9th. Ward, New Orleans Photo set @ Flickr Notes from the Photographer [...]

  3. The Heretik » Blog Archive » Lost on 28 Aug 2006 at 9:59 am

    [...] More pre-programming today? Bush heads down to Katrinaland a day early. From the Times-Picayune: “Bush’s itinerary looks a lot like previous trips, many of which have been criticized as featuring too much staged contact with supportive locals and overly dominated by meetings with officials. . . . . On Tuesday, the anniversary itself, the president is skipping the city’s many planned activities.” Send in the cavalry clowns: “Americans love them some anniversaries, whether positive or catastrophic, so the clown show is firing on all cylinders.” Plus mime or meme? Is it those who can, do or those who can will not? “The inaction is the action.” Why New Orleans is still broken . Consider the broken promises. [...]

  4. sw’as » The Heart Breaks on 28 Aug 2006 at 8:01 pm

    [...] The bloke who took the photos gives his thoughts about them on his blog. [...]

  5. BFW Local 734 » Katrina One Year Later on 28 Aug 2006 at 9:26 pm

    [...] In the meantime, chew on this. I regularly sing the praises of Matt Cohen over at 1115, and will continue to do so until he’s on the Daily Show as one of the internet’s best bloggers. This entry has never made me prouder to count him as one of my friends. A truly engaging photo essay/article on Katrina through his own words and lens. [...]

  6. philly » Blog Archive » Katrina One Year Later on 28 Aug 2006 at 10:15 pm

    [...] Once again via the Tattered Coat, I'm reminded to go read this post over at 1115.org. Blogger/photographer Matt Cohen [a Pittsburgh native] went down to New Orleans ahead of Dubya to see what he could see. It's not pretty, but it has to be seen. And by everybody. What happened in New Orleans and all along the Gulf Coast one year ago cannot be forgotten nor whitewashed by Dubya's platitutes of all the "progress" made down there. Make sure to take a click through Matt's flickr set of gorgeous black and white images of what the 9th Ward of New Orleans looks like today. [...]

  7. Suburban Guerrilla » ‘Home This Was Home’ on 29 Aug 2006 at 9:23 am

    [...] [More here.] [...]

  8. Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » The Katrina Campaign on 29 Aug 2006 at 2:15 pm

    [...] Just more random thoughts. Now that we know that Katrina had NOTHING to do with the flood, it’s still fun to watch the left – especially this kind of left – still hammer Bush over the recovery effort, and haven’t a clue about what really happened. But I bet you didn’t know that one year after Katrina, Ray Nagin still has no tangeable plan for recovery of HIS city. Yet he gets a pass. [...]

  9. Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Kyra’s Confessions on 29 Aug 2006 at 7:28 pm

    [...] Just more random thoughts. Now that we know that Katrina had NOTHING to do with the flood, it’s still fun to watch the left – especially this kind of left – still hammer Bush over the recovery effort, and haven’t a clue about what really happened. But I bet you didn’t know that one year after Katrina, Ray Nagin still has no tangeable plan for recovery of HIS city. Yet he gets a pass. [...]

  10. Thou Shall Not Suck » Blog Archive » Image of Incompetence on 29 Aug 2006 at 9:15 pm

    [...] Just check out Matt’s Flickr set — he’s down in NOLA showing us all just how much is left to do. He’s also got an AMAZING post over at 1115. I know I recommend a lot of links, but that one is a must read. [...]

  11. Jackson G. Tickle Enterprises Presents…Panama’s Propositions :: It’s Like 1954 All Over Again… on 21 Dec 2007 at 10:39 am

    [...] A Victory Lap For Broken Promises [...]

Comments

  1. btezra wrote:

    “There was a time not long ago when Presidents were punished severely for breaking their promises.”

    -too bad that hardly is the case today.
    Thank you for all teh images, the words, the reporting and the documentation…

    “It is a window for people everywhere to view what passes for reconstruction in a neighborhood few care about.”

    -Amen.

  2. Matt wrote:

    This is what people mean when they say “represent.”

  3. Nathan wrote:

    Very Good Post. It makes me happy that 1115.org hasn’t forgotten about New Orleans, and it makes me even happier that ya’ll are grilling the right people (Bush and the Federal Government) for not taking bold action in the rebuilding efforts.

    keep reppin the 504

  4. marc wrote:

    to date, this is probably the best post that i have seen on this site. you’ve brought to life the absolute frustration the rest of us feel about this subject. incredible job.

  5. aunt jo wrote:

    good job matt………im proud of you

  6. sac wrote:

    Very nicely done.

  7. buu wrote:

    well done. emotional but with the facts to back it up.

  8. Mungai wrote:

    Matt, you seem to be ignoring many of the problems (past and present) in order to point the blame squarely at the President and his party. First, much of the damage you are recounting could have been avoided if the democratic leadership in NO had not diverted funds for levee construction and maintenance to other unrelated activities and political favoritism. Secondly, despite Federal warnings and mandates, the city never complied in completing an evacuation and disaster readiness plan. Thirdly, they had been warned for over 50 years about the danger the city and area faced from hurricane storm surge, yet they not only failed to take the appropriate steps to prepare but as motioned diverted money intoned to assist to other projects, committees, etc. Even worse, they allowed much of the protective barrier to be eroded, (marshes, sediment islands, etc) built on or otherwise destroyed. Developers have wreaked havoc on the ecosystem by filling in the protective marshes and other areas that have shielded the city for years. The diversion of the mighty Mississippi has resulted in sediments no longer being deposited at the mouth of the river which served to dissipate a storm surge and high waves. Many mistakes were made in the past not associated with the current Republican leadership, to the contrary they are directly the result of the corrupt democratic leadership that has controlled NO and the state for years.

    As for present problems, many of the casualties could have been avoided if the mayor would have acted properly and quickly. Did it not sicken you that he let 1,000+ buses sit idle that could have been used to evacuate people prior to the storm. His excuse was he did not want to pay overtime. (Disgusting) If this simple step had been taken, many of the people at the Super Dome would have ended up elsewhere in more suitable housing. Further, while the Federal administration deserves some blame for the response, equal blame must be put on the state and local officials. Under the law, they must request Federal assistance before it can be provided, they controlled the National Guard (not the Feds) and they were responsible for initial search & rescue and management of the shelters. All could of should of and needed to do better.

    Looking at the present you ignore many of the legal and political issues that are causing problems with the recovery. The ACLU, local citizens and other organizations have sued to stop the demolition of many of the homes and in the process have stopped the clean-up of those areas. Due to those actions, a legal condemnation proceeding must occur for each residence. This has drastically slowed any recovery of the hardest hit areas and resulted in a focus on less damaged areas. Further, I have a number of friends in disaster restoration that went to the area immediately after the flooding to assist with recovery. In most cases they were denied work by the local officials doling out Federal money for the clean-up. The reasons given to each were the same, they were reserving the money for local citizens. My friends returned frustrated that they were not able to assist and wondering why their tax money was being used to clean-up the area when such work was being “reserved” strictly for locals and political favors.

    Yes, it is disgusting that after 1 year, more progress has not been made. That being said, I think your blind partisanship has prevented you from seeing the broader picture and placing blame where it deserves to be placed, on Everyone involved…. that is the political leaders at all levels (especially past but also present), the local citizens, the local Levee administration, the Army Corps of engineers, local developers & builders, etc….. the list is almost endless. Don’t let your anger, hatred or partisanship blind you to the truth.

  9. Rhonda wrote:

    Matt, the humanistic element to your post is powerful and rightly so, should move many in this nation to remember those who have not still. However, either intentional or not, you failed to include some important information along side your criticisms of the Bush administration which can be easily summarized by reading this NPR article which starts out…

    The process of rebuilding New Orleans will depend on decisions by individual residents as well as state and local planners

    The failure of the Bush Administration to expedite funding is perhaps a valid point, but no matter how much money is thrown at NO, the money cannot be effective if the local governments don’t act on it.

  10. jamie wrote:

    Seeing as how Mungai is a friend of mine and I think Matt is mid-air at the moment, I will take minute to respond before the attacks start.

    Mungai, I think Matt is not saying that Nagin and Blanco are blameless, he’s merely saying that the grandstanding Bush has done is unacceptable. Listen, as you point out, no one is blameless here, but the facts can’t be ignored in favor of a “mission accomplished” stance. It’s just not, well, Presidential, at least it wouldn’t have been in years past.

    Beyond that, the fact that your friends were turned away in favor of locals has not played out and the suspension of the Davis-Bacon act was a federal move that cannot be ignored — the people that are earning money in NO are not locals and they are not making a living wage. No matter who is to blame, it is unacceptable.

    You may say Matt’s post is one-sided, but so is your response….Matt’s overall point is that this is the richest nation in the world and our citizens are living in squalor a year after a disaster which could be repeated at any moment — isn’t ultimately the President’s job to not let that happen? And given that it is happening, shouldn’t there be less grandstanding?

  11. photosuperstar wrote:

    This is by far one of te best things I think you have ever written and shot. Big ups!, and so, so, well done.

    Excellent work man, excellent!

  12. matt wrote:

    Mungai:

    First, much of the damage you are recounting could have been avoided if the democratic leadership in NO had not diverted funds for levee construction and maintenance to other unrelated activities and political favoritism.

    yeah, that’s what happened.

    from sept 2004:

    In 2003, Congress approved a White House proposal to cut FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) in half. Previously, the federal government was committed to invest 15 percent of the recovery costs of a given disaster in mitigating future problems. Under the Bush formula, the feds now cough up only 7.5 percent.

    Such post-disaster mitigation efforts, specialists say, are a crucial way of minimizing future losses. It’s after a disaster strikes, they argue, that the government can best take the steps necessary to avoid repeat problems, because that’s when officials and storm victims are most receptive to mitigation plans.

    Larry Larson is executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, an organization that keeps a close eye on mitigation matters. The Bush administration, he says, is “being penny-wise and pound foolish” by cutting the HMGP formula. His group has pressed Congress to restore the federal investment to 15 percent of disaster costs, and he expects that some legislators will soon take up the cause on their own.
    [...]
    Pressed on this issue, Bush administration officials have said that the formula puts more of the mitigation burden on state governments, where it belongs. But the National Emergency Management Association (NEMA) points out that, now more than ever, cash-strapped states cannot afford to pick up the balance.

    from june 2005

    In fiscal year 2006, the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is bracing for a record $71.2 million reduction in federal funding.

    It would be the largest single-year funding loss ever for the New Orleans district, Corps officials said.

    I’ve been here over 30 years and I’ve never seen this level of reduction, said Al Naomi, project manager for the New Orleans district. I think part of the problem is it’s not so much the reduction, it’s the drastic reduction in one fiscal year. It’s the immediacy of the reduction that I think is the hardest thing to adapt to.
    [...]
    Congress is setting the Corps budget.

    The House of Representatives wants to cut the New Orleans district budget 21 percent to $272.4 million in 2006, down from $343.5 million in 2005. The House figure is about $20 million lower than the president’s suggested $290.7 million budget.
    [...]
    One of the hardest-hit areas of the New Orleans district’s budget is the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, which was created after the May 1995 flood to improve drainage in Jefferson, Orleans and St. Tammany parishes. SELA’s budget is being drained from $36.5 million awarded in 2005 to $10.4 million suggested for 2006 by the House of Representatives and the president.

    Mungai:

    Secondly, despite Federal warnings and mandates, the city never complied in completing an evacuation and disaster readiness plan.

    they still haven’t, and nagin eats that meal himself.

    Thirdly, they had been warned for over 50 years about the danger the city and area faced from hurricane storm surge, yet they not only failed to take the appropriate steps to prepare but as motioned diverted money intoned to assist to other projects, committees, etc.

    see above. repeating things doesn’t make them so.

    Even worse, they allowed much of the protective barrier to be eroded, (marshes, sediment islands, etc) built on or otherwise destroyed. Developers have wreaked havoc on the ecosystem by filling in the protective marshes and other areas that have shielded the city for years.

    environmental deregulation is a hallmark of which party again?

    Did it not sicken you that he let 1,000+ buses sit idle that could have been used to evacuate people prior to the storm. His excuse was he did not want to pay overtime. (Disgusting) If this simple step had been taken, many of the people at the Super Dome would have ended up elsewhere in more suitable housing.

    of course. nagin, the recently former republican, is as i said, a clown.

    The ACLU, local citizens and other organizations have sued to stop the demolition of many of the homes and in the process have stopped the clean-up of those areas.

    they are trying to preserve the situation for legal battles with insurance companies that are going out of their way to hose their customers.

    Don’t let your anger, hatred or partisanship blind you to the truth.

    i’m angry. i am a partisan. the point of my photos and most of what i wrote is that the president made promises he had no intention of keeping, and is now acting like he kept them. there must be a price for that.

    as an aside to those who normally disagree with what is written here: this is how you disagree.

  13. matt wrote:

    The failure of the Bush Administration to expedite funding is perhaps a valid point, but no matter how much money is thrown at NO, the money cannot be effective if the local governments don’t act on it.

    we live under a president who has assumed powers not unlike a king when it suits him. to say that he’s being rolled by clowny ass nagin and lil miss blanco is just silly.

  14. sac wrote:

    I was going to mention that hey, your photos are being featured on FlickrBlog, and nice going and all that, but then I read your comment about how to disagree, and boy, you can be a tool.

  15. matt wrote:

    right, because someone that pukes on their keyboard to indicate dissent is the same as someone who actually puts some thought into something.

  16. sac wrote:

    Someone who assumes that people who disagree with them are simply not thinking is an asshole.

  17. matt wrote:

    since my fam is reading this post, i’m going to refrain from calling you a dense motherfucker.

    if you think that the trolls here think, i have news for you. they regurgitative whatever happens to be on free republic or little green racists that day. that’s why they have no ability to answer questions. come to think of it, you aren’t so good at that either.

  18. eponymagain wrote:

    As Thucydides observed, “The strong do as they can, and the weak suffer as they must.” The sad reality is that the story might be different—as is so often the case—if only the powerful applied their strength to anything other than self-realization. Even a great leader is in danger of presiding over destruction if he is in the thrall of fantasy: if he is seduced into believing that he is an angel of history, a vessel of fate, an actor of global importance, a hero of fearsome symmetry. I am afraid that there is no disaster great enough to break the spell of such worshipful self-regard. The weak suffering as they must is at best an irritating distraction to them as they make history with their boldness. They don’t clean up messes. Angels of history act with boldness, cleaning people clean up messes. It should not surprise us, but it certainly concerns us: because as divided we may be—by politics, intersts, income, opportunity, race—we remain, as physicists might say, bound by the same controlling mechanism.

  19. Susan wrote:

    I thank Jamie for sending us the link to your thoughts and images.They are breathtaking in a bad and sad way.I don’t really think it matters who is to blame at this point.What should we do at this time to help in your opinion..how is help best dispensed?

  20. allnice wrote:

    Good blog man. America is a joke right now. I don’t think anything can stop the U.S. from ethering itself…..

  21. Mungai wrote:

    Let me address some of your responses in order. I will apologize about the length but wanted to provide factual data and reports to back up my comments.

    Mungai original post said:

    “First, much of the damage you are recounting could have been avoided if the democratic leadership in NO had not diverted funds for levee construction and maintenance to other unrelated activities and political favoritism.”

    Matt replied:

    “yeah, that’s what happened.”

    Re-Response – Mattt that is exactly what happened. Yes you can cite to the administration cutting the levee budget but but when they are diverting 60+ million to casinos and other unrelated projects, shouldn’t the purse be tightened.

    From MSNBC Nov. 11, 2005 regarding the Levee Baord

    “NUNGESSER: A cesspool of politics, that`s all it was. Provide jobs for people and state senators and you know contracts, giving out contracts.

    MYERS: In fact, NBC News has uncovered a pattern of what critics call questionable spending practices by the Levee Board, a board which at one point was accused by a state inspector general of a longstanding and continuing disregard of the public interest.

    Beyond the fountain, there`s $15 million spent on two overpasses that helped gamblers get to Bally`s riverboat casino. Critics tried and failed to put some of that money into flood protection, $45 million for private investigators to dig up dirt on a radio host and board critic, then another $45,000 to settle after he sued.

    MYERS: Critics charged for years the board has paid more attention to marinas, gambling and business than to maintaining the levees. Example, of 11 construction projects now on the board`s Web site, only two are related to flood control.”

    Also of note:

    “The Army Corps of Engineers spent more money in Louisiana than any other state, including California, which I think has eight times the population.”

    “It turned out that, on the east side of town, some of those levees were overtopped. But, around the lake, those levees were not even close to overtopped. There was clearly three or four feet of freeboard. So, that`s what shows you that there`s some sort of design and construction problem. It doesn`t necessarily say that there`s some kind of criminal malfeasance, but it does show that the levee system did not do what it was supposed to do.”

    In fact it has been learned that the local contractors (politically connected) who won the contracts from the levee board for construction and maintenance did not build the levees according to design specs both in terms of depth of pilings and fill material. In most cases these contracts were awarded by the democratically controlled levee board as political favors.

    Mungai’s original post said “Even worse, they allowed much of the protective barrier to be eroded, (marshes, sediment islands, etc) built on or otherwise destroyed. Developers have wreaked havoc on the ecosystem by filling in the protective marshes and other areas that have shielded the city for years.”

    Matt’s response “environmental deregulation is a hallmark of which party again?”

    Re-Response – Matt, I will address this in multiple ways. First, as with many, your memory regarding environmental protections is very short and without historical reflection. Some of the greatest protections afforded the environment have come during Republican administrations of the past. Furthermore, the Mellon and Scaife families (noted Republicans) and the foundations they chair have protected more land than any other foundation of philanthropists and have done so in all 50 states. Where is Soros and all his billions and the other left leaning (environmentally concerned liberals)?

    This article addresses many of the problems.
    Agence France Presse – English September 8, 2005

    “Human activity has led to coastal erosion and receding wetlands in Louisiana, depriving the southern US state of its natural storm barrier, said experts who had been warning that a catastrophe like Hurricane Katrina was lurking just around the corner.

    “Because of continuing land loss, many of coastal Louisiana’s populated areas, including New Orleans, are almost completely exposed to the Gulf of Mexico,” said Valsin Marmillon, spokesman for America’s Wetland: Campaign to Save Coastal Louisiana.

    “The sad irony of the situation is that the Mississippi River levees, which were constructed to protect lives in the 1930s, have had the unintended consequence of laying waste to the very wetlands that are the state’s greatest natural protection,” he added.“

    Note that these levees and the other work done to the Mississippi River were the result of a desire to enhance commerce, industry and the economy in Louisiana and other Southern states. At the time of construction of the Levees and diversion of the Mississippi the South states were all firmly controlled by Democrats as was as the presidency of the U.S. from 1933 to 1953, again the years the levees were constructed. So in this regard, it was the Democrats who laid waste to the environment and ultimate exaserbated the problems NO has today.

    “Since the levees were built, more than 5,000 square kilometers (1,982 square miles) of wetlands — an area twice the size of Luxembourg — have disappeared. An additional 1,300 square kilometers (500 square miles) of wetlands will disappear over the next 50 years if the erosion is not checked.

    “New Orleans won’t be safe from another storm like Katrina until we restore this hurricane buffer,” warned Robert Twilley, a wetlands specialist at the University of Louisiana who heads a two-billion-dollar (Federally funded) project to renourish the delta. (Mungai note – that was the Republicans you like to bash who are funding this while the Levee Board builds marinas)

    Despite the high cost of the programme, Twilley said much more money is needed to restore enough marshland to protect New Orleans: “A very rough estimate is about 14 billion,” he said.

    Gregory Stone, a geology professor at Louisiana State University, said computer models showed that for every 2.6 square kilometers (640 acres) of marshes and islands, the storm surge from a hurricane drops by 30 centimeters (one foot). “We also have data that conclusively shows the Louisiana coast is becoming more vulnerable every year if we don’t bolster marshes and islands,” he added.”

    Mungai original post said “The ACLU, local citizens and other organizations have sued to stop the demolition of many of the homes and in the process have stopped the clean-up of those areas.”

    Matt’s response “they are trying to preserve the situation for legal battles with insurance companies that are going out of their way to hose their customers.”

    Re-Response – OK Matt, I don’t think much needs to be said here. So you admit there are legitimate reasons why much of the demolition and reconstruction cannot proceed. Please note that insurers are governed by State Law not Federal. I will also add the comments below regarding the issues of waste disposal. Please note that the waste must all be sorted during pick-up due to potentially toxic wastes and other waste related issues. Each type of waste 7+ must be delivered to specially designated landfills designed to handle the materials in question. (Yes, again the Republicans doing what is right environmentally and being criticized for it because it slows collection) I will also note that there are over 350,000 cars and almost 37,000 boats that must be hauled, drained of hazardous fluids and then disposed of in some fashion. (Again, the plan is to make them environmentally benign before disposal).

    Even wood waste must be specially handled due to an Asian termite species that was accidentally brought to NO in 1940’s. As a result, the wood waste cannot be trucked out of state or to uninfected parts of Louisiana itself. In fact the preferred disposal method for the wood waste is to burn it. To bury it only creates a breading ground for the termites.

    “The infrastructure developed to track and manage all of this waste is extraordinary. In a dingy building in Baton Rouge, Georgiann Shult, a Corps employee from central Pennsylvania, has developed a computerized database that tracks every truckload of waste hauled by her agency’s contractors. Every load has a paper ticket signed by the driver and by the operator of the disposal site. Dozens of staffers in the Baton Rouge office enter information from those tickets into the database, at a rate of several thousand tickets per day. At the touch of a few buttons, Shult can locate any truckload of waste.

    By late December, she had records on more than 300,000 loads of debris hauled by the 10,000 trucks that the Corps’s primary contractors had operated since September.”

    I can go on and on regarding the delays in reconstruction and place blame on all involved. While it is politically convenient to place the majority of the blame for this catastrophe on the President and his administration, the sad truth is that the majority of the blame should lie at the feet of the local and state officials both past and present. It would just not be as beneficial to most pundants and politicians on the other side of the isle to place the blame where it really belongs.

  22. matt wrote:

    Yes you can cite to the administration cutting the levee budget but but when they are diverting 60+ million to casinos and other unrelated projects, shouldn’t the purse be tightened.

    no. cutting a critical budget over the objections of experts isn’t the answer. you know what is? oversight. with federal dollars used to come accountability and oversight. it’s facile and worse, lazy, to say that simply cutting a budget to stop unrelated projects is the answer. that just leads to unrelated projects from a smaller pie.

    Where is Soros and all his billions and the other left leaning (environmentally concerned liberals)?

    ah yes, the soros boogeyman. what he chooses to do with his money is his business. lots of good causes there though. i find it hard to picture you behind your computer writing about republicans protecting the environment with a straight face. they ran and won in 94 on a platform that consisted of little more than rolling back regulation of all kinds, with a special emphasis on environmental. who is out there denying global warming in the face of all scientists? who wants to drill everywhere there is 3 gallons of oil 1000 feet underground?

    At the time of construction of the Levees and diversion of the Mississippi the South states were all firmly controlled by Democrats as was as the presidency of the U.S. from 1933 to 1953, again the years the levees were constructed. So in this regard, it was the Democrats who laid waste to the environment and ultimate exaserbated the problems NO has today.

    hilarious. 1953? and i’m the blind partisan?

    past that, why is it that republicans have controlled the south since not long after 1953? it’s their southern strategy. interesting when the racial components of katrina are considered, especially the difference between the lower 9th and lakeview on this very day.

    So you admit there are legitimate reasons why much of the demolition and reconstruction cannot proceed. Please note that insurers are governed by State Law not Federal.

    depends on what you mean by legitimate. i know what laws govern the insurers, and while i was down there, i also heard a lot about the games the companies are playing and the lengths that the insurance commissioner is going to to stop them. again, i’ll ask you, why is there so much progress in lakeview and not in the 9th? different insurers? different boogeyman aclu suits?

    all kinds of environmental regulations were waived on 9/11 for lower manhattan. why the difference? political gamesmanship, maybe? you didn’t address my points about how this is all very convenient for republicans…

    the sad truth is that the majority of the blame should lie at the feet of the local and state officials both past and present.

    blind partisanship. let’s talk percentages: nagin, blanco, bush. how does the blame get distributed, both in disaster management and recovery facilitation?

    It would just not be as beneficial to most pundants and politicians on the other side of the isle to place the blame where it really belongs.

    what most? is this a librul media argument?

    i just don’t understand. if katrina had been a series of bombings on the scale of 9/11, bush would be camping in NO directing the kind of nails that were used and the color of people’s uniforms. why is it different because it was a storm and flood? why do the people who get all tingly watching tape of bush landing on aircraft carriers and imagining bush-authorized torture sessions producing all kinds of actionable intel, defend the same president as getting rolled by an incompetent mayor?

  23. frank gerbik wrote:

    you need to stop being so defensive, boss. your anger isn’t constructive or helpful and actually makes it seem like you’re doing nothing but grandstanding and pushing your own agenda.

    most importantly, great photographs aside, you’re not exactly addressing anything new here. if you want to change the world, become a politician.

  24. matt wrote:

    your anger isn’t constructive or helpful and actually makes it seem like you’re doing nothing but grandstanding and pushing your own agenda.

    grandstanding?

    you’re not exactly addressing anything new here.

    funny, i didn’t realize that was my intention.

    if you want to change the world, become a politician.

    unfortunately i have a past that no doubt disqualifies me from that. although most politicians don’t change anything, and some fight like hell to push it backwards.

  25. jg wrote:

    Good blog man. America is a joke right now. I don’t think anything can stop the U.S. from ethering itself…..

    You lie, allnice, as does most of ‘victory lap’ (not) article above. Nice details, but microscope only. Yep, you ain’t walked the walk, babe.

    Katrina wiped out much of THREE STATES. Have you documented the work REGION wide–the human cost, the rebuilding, the human spirit? YOU DO CARE ABOUT EVERYONE, DON’T YOU? Well, we who are building in Alabama and Mississippi have. We are Americans.

    You can come help. Over 350,000 volunteers have. We need you, not your mouth. LEAVE THE CAMERA and the sick politics. It don’t get it done. Just your body and strong back. See you helping NEEDING homebuilder/church/community come back AND PUTTING SWEAT IN PLACE OF YOUR laziness.

    Expect to hear about your hard work HELPING IN THE NEXT YEAR. You’ve WASTED this year.

  26. matt wrote:

    You lie, allnice, as does most of ‘victory lap’ (not) article above.

    if you plan on calling me a liar, provide the proof. accusations like that aren’t going to stay up here for long.

    Nice details, but microscope only.

    i spent a week in one city. i’m not a damn news organization, i’m a blogger/photographer who was lucky enough to have some free time and a few people to drive me around. this wasn’t billed as anything other than what i have seen for the last year and the last week. why are blog posts suddenly supposed to be comprehensive? do you demand the same for the media?

    Yep, you ain’t walked the walk, babe.

    how’s that?

    Have you documented the work REGION wide–the human cost, the rebuilding, the human spirit? YOU DO CARE ABOUT EVERYONE, DON’T YOU? Well, we who are building in Alabama and Mississippi have. We are Americans.

    care to fund my travel expenses / photo time? thought not. i did this on my own dime. not enough for you? then you do it.

    You can come help. Over 350,000 volunteers have. We need you, not your mouth. LEAVE THE CAMERA and the sick politics. It don’t get it done. Just your body and strong back. See you helping NEEDING homebuilder/church/community come back AND PUTTING SWEAT IN PLACE OF YOUR laziness.

    laziness? i traveled across the country to do this. i have donated to habitat for humanity (and chose them for memorial contributions in memory of my father) and the red cross. because i’m not building houses, i’m not helping and lazy? sorry chief.

    Expect to hear about your hard work HELPING IN THE NEXT YEAR. You’ve WASTED this year.

    go fuck yourself.

  27. Glen wrote:

    You can come help. Over 350,000 volunteers have.

    I remember reading an article about two UCLA college students flying to NO for the weekend to volunteer their time to Habitat for Humanity.

    If those 350,000 volunteers donated $300 instead of paying as much (or more) for their air-tickets, over $100 million could have gone towards rebuilding safe communities for NO’s poorest, or made a fine downpayment on new schools for the entire region.

    Sweat-equity is a fine thing, though it hardly delivers the best return on investment.

  28. Jason Ed wrote:

    Too bad this post is for naught, as Katrina did not cause the flooding. More http://wizbangblog.com/2006/08/28/the-katrina-video-congress-didnt-want-you-to-see.php

    Get the story right, then repost. You have the wrong villan, but then again, you on the left always do.

  29. tom wrote:

    its really not at all about hammering bush in particular, but the entire republican controlled senate as well as the appointed heads of fema and other governmental organizations whom are all being directed by an administration that is stupid at best and negligent as well, as proved repeatedly by anything that has happened thus far in the bush administration: 9-11 (still nothing happening at the towers), iraw and afghanistan (things are going swimmingly there), NO (as we’re all seeing here), the economy (see the new york times article from the other day about real wages being down and corporate profits being up), etc. pretty much everything the bush administration has contact with is screwed up beyond recognition. unfortunately for them, this one touches a large enough group of people all in the same place to really show them and their “leadership” for what they really are: chumps. local and state government are of course responsible for their share as well, but if the federal government isnt there to help pick up the pieces when a tragedy occurs on our shores, what are they good for? the answer is nothing. but thats not a problem inherent in the system, its inherent in the approach of republicans who want to cut the federal government. what better way to do so than to make it so useless that no one wants to put money into it anymore? theyre succeeding…..

    i can’t wait till these jokers have to pay the piper for the last few years of their egregious errors. that will be fun.

  30. jamie beth wrote:

    Okay everyone, deep breath. Politics aside, just ask yourself this question:

    On August 30 2005 did you imagine that New Orleans would still look like it does today?

    I’m guessing most of you said no.

    Now ask yourself this question:

    In the richest country in the world, is it acceptable for damage like this to still exist a year later?

    Instead of focusing on blame, just do what you can. And don’t be fooled by empty promises, “Mission Accomplished” banners or anything else you cannot verify for yourself.

    You think Matt’s angry? Sure he is, some would argue if you aren’t angry, you aren’t paying attention.

    He went to New Orleans and took pictures – that’s what he does. He wrote about what he saw – raising the awareness of the thousands of people who read this site everyday. He didn’t skip a beat when asked where we should encourage people to contribute money in memory of our father: as far as we were concerned the defining event of last year was Katrina and if someone was going to give money to a cause in our dad’s name it was going to go to the Gulf area.

    Everyone contributes how they can. What Glen said was so right — Sweat-equity is one thing, but it’s not the only thing.

    This reminds me of the days after Sept. 11th when I took it upon myself to try to convey what was happening in and around my neighborhood in Brooklyn to my friends and family around the world. A distant cousin wrote to me and told me to “quit my crying and go donate blood.” This was a horrifying statement on so many levels that I still to this day have not been in contact with that cousin.

    You do what you can, where you can, how you can and it may not be what someone else would do, but it will be the best you can do.

  31. Unholy Moses wrote:

    That. Kicked. Ass.

    And, of course, I agree with pretty much everything you wrote.

    Nicely done.

  32. Mungai wrote:

    Jamie said: “On August 30 2005 did you imagine that New Orleans would still look like it does today?”

    “In the richest country in the world, is it acceptable for damage like this to still exist a year later?”

    Actually, yes I would expect a very slow recovery despite the wealth of our nation. Much of the rebuilding is dependent on insurance, government grants and other funds. Further, who wants to rebuild in areas that were under 20 ft of water until the Levee system is repaired and a better solution in place. Finally, as previously noted the legal system is screwed up. The liberals on the Supreme Court (yes Matt it was the liberal judges) ruled that government can take peoples property through eminent domain for resorts and shopping malls. Yet, the ACLU has successfully sued to stop mass condemnation of destroyed properties preventing quick demolition and reconstruction of the area. It is now necessary for the local gov’t to conduct a condemnation hearing on each property. Do you have any idea the length of time it takes? I am sure you do not.

    Further, billions of dollars have been misappropriated by local and state officials and much of the remaining money provided by the Federal Gov’t to those agencies has yet to be spent.

    Finally, I will add that this is the system that YOU have created. Big Government, Substantial Laws, Rules and Regulations. The system that was created by the liberal masses in government and through the courts moves so slow it almost goes backward. Again, see the big picture!!!

    You all look at progress and say it is a lack of money or broken promises. You think money can fix anything or immediately solve any problem. That is a materialistic and simplistic view. It is more a result of bottlenecks created over the years, an inefficient system and local governments.

    Finally, I will again address the clean-up process. Remember that under the mandates of Fema and the other agencies, all waste must be presorted into 7 classes and collected separately. This is due to the environmental concerns of the materials and need for proper disposal. Therefore, each pile in the street must be gone through by hand, separated and then removed to a specially designated landfill. By December 1 over 300,000 truckloads had been removed and the pace has quickened since that time. Complicating matters is that the piles are replaced (unsorted) as soon as they are removed as people return and try to rebuild.

    There is a lot more to the story than the intentionally One-Sided views above.

    Politics as usual, tell only the part of the story that benefits your view and leave out the rest.

  33. jamie wrote:

    Politics as usual, indeed.

    Mungai — any chance Bush and his cronies did anything wrong in the past 12 months?

    “Finally, I will add that this is the system that YOU have created. Big Government, Substantial Laws, Rules and Regulations. The system that was created by the liberal masses in government and through the courts moves so slow it almost goes backward. Again, see the big picture!!!”

    To say that Dems created Big Govt doesn’t take into account the fact that Bush has abused it. Putting an arabian horse trainer with a falsified resume in charge of your health and safety and mine is an abuse of any system no matter how you look at it.

    “Finally, I will again address the clean-up process. Remember that under the mandates of Fema and the other agencies, all waste must be presorted into 7 classes and collected separately. . .”

    Matt has already addressed that “all kinds of environmental regulations were waived on 9/11 for lower manhattan. why the difference?”

    You may call Matt and this site one-sided, but you can’t really claim to be impartial, can you? (BTW – I still like you :) It is no surpise to me that we are in disagreement over this.)

  34. matt wrote:

    well, my hopes of finding someone to go the distance have again been dashed. mungai, after accusing me of partisanship and ideology, you fell back on even less than that, simply repeating the same old tropes about librul judges, suffocating regulation, and context free numbers. it’s unfortunate.

  35. sarabeth wrote:

    Okay everyone, deep breath. Politics aside, just ask yourself this question:

    On August 30 2005 did you imagine that New Orleans would still look like it does today?

    Frankly, till I read Matt’s post I had no idea that New Orleans still looked like this today. From everything I had read and seen — on the MSM and in blogs — I had no idea. You read stories where one person relates their personal tale of woe. You read some weak blanket statements about how little has been done generally. Nothing I read before brought the enormity of the not-doneness even remotely alive. Not in pictures, not in words.

    And I think that, simply put, is why so many people were so moved by Matt’s post.

  36. TedK wrote:

    I tried to follow jamie beth’s advice and put politics aside, but the only thing I am left with from Matt’s post and replies are the pictures and one comment from Matt…

    go f##k yourself.

  37. matt wrote:

    mission accomplished!

  38. Jenn wrote:

    nice work, i checked out your flikr slideshow because our work is posted together on the wireless-watch blog site:

    http://wireless-watch.com/2006/08/28/katrina-1-year-after/

    Jennifer Warren | Photography
    http://www.jwpictures.net/

  39. seamus wrote:

    One year ago, The Economist ran a cover story on Katrina with the headline “America’s Shame.” It was an accurate headline. Everything failed. Nagin and Blanco failed to lead their constituents to safety. Brownie, a horse judge put in charge of civilian emergency response, failed miserably. If Bush were an attentive president instead of one living in a sealed bubble, he would have noticed the breakdown and assumed federal control. (This is something he’s been more than willing — even thrilled — to do when it’s suited him for other purposes.)

    That so much of NOLA is still a wasteland is evidence of the general failure of American federalism. This isn’t Bush’s fault, but it is his responsibility.

  40. jamie wrote:

    >>This isn’t Bush’s fault, but it is his responsibility.
    Whether I agree with this or not, more talk about responsibility and less talk about fault would be much appreciated.

  41. sac wrote:

    One year ago, The Economist ran a cover story on Katrina with the headline “America’s Shame.”

    I remember that. The first thing that came to mind upon reading it was, “Thank God is wasn’t a heatwave and over 15,000 died like in Europe (where The Economist is published) during 2003.” Because THAT would be a shame.

    I agree the Katrina situation is fucked up, but shit like that Economist article is ridiculous.

  42. matt wrote:

    are you trying to argue that the economist didn’t cover the heatwave extensively? (they certainly did) or that they should only criticize things that happen in england?

    i wonder how all the reconstruction is going in europe, what with all the melted buildings and what not.

  43. sac wrote:

    Of course not, they covered it extensively. Did they have a headline on the cover saying something to the effect of “Europe’s Shame?” I don’t know. I’m hoping not, as I don’ t like that kind of thing in supposedly thorough news outlets.

  44. sac wrote:

    “i wonder how all the reconstruction is going in europe, what with all the melted buildings and what not.”

    Also, I’ll destroyed houses over an addtional 14,000 dead, any day.

  45. matt wrote:

    Also, I’ll destroyed houses over an addtional 14,000 dead, any day.

    yeah, because that was my point.

  46. sac wrote:

    Then what WAS the point of that add-on sentence? Oh wait, I’m not supposed to ask things like that because the writers here always, ALWAYS convey their thoughts clearly and if there is any confusion, it’s simply user error.

    I’m not really sure why you would have a problem with the way I reacted to that Economist headline.

  47. sarabeth wrote:

    One year ago, The Economist ran a cover story on Katrina with the headline “America’s Shame.”

    I remember that. The first thing that came to mind upon reading it was, “Thank God is wasn’t a heatwave and over 15,000 died like in Europe (where The Economist is published) during 2003.” Because THAT would be a shame.

    I agree the Katrina situation is fucked up, but shit like that Economist article is ridiculous.

    Instead of doing your alleged thinking off-stage, how about you take the time to spell out what you mean, and justify and support your views?

  48. sarabeth wrote:

    Of course not, they covered it extensively. Did they have a headline on the cover saying something to the effect of “Europe’s Shame?” I don’t know. I’m hoping not, as I don’ t like that kind of thing in supposedly thorough news outlets.

    That’s what you meant to say, “I’m hoping not“?

  49. matt wrote:

    if there is any confusion, it’s simply user error.

    you’re just confused. looking for equivalencies so that you can fit them into your little “oh well, both sides are bad” box.

    what isn’t shameful about this? i’ll wait while you puzzle that one out.

    what isn’t shameful about this? again, i’ll wait.

    I’m not really sure why you would have a problem with the way I reacted to that Economist headline.

    because i will defend the honor of the economist to the death? because you make no case for why it’s not accurate / called for / necessary. just the usual contrarian-for-contrarian-sake nonsense.

  50. sac wrote:

    That’s what you meant to say, “I’m hoping not“?

    Yeah. I’m a fan of just covering the story and leaving emotional statements for editorials.

    what isn’t shameful about this? i’ll wait while you puzzle that one out.

    what isn’t shameful about this? again, i’ll wait.

    Sure it’s shameful. Almost as shameful as 15,000 people dying because of a heatwave. I just don’t like to be told what emotion I should be feeling by a news magazine. I’ll come to those conlcusions if the story is covered correctly.

  51. matt wrote:

    I’ll come to those conlcusions if the story is covered correctly.

    so you don’t read the economist much then?

  52. sac wrote:

    Occasionally. I’m not sure if your joke is that the Economist is a good or bad newsmag. I’ve found it to be pretty thorough, obviously left-leaning, good on “international” stories. But yeah, that headline buged the crap out of me, for the reasons I’ve mentioned. What can I say? Europe is no better than the US on natural disasters? OK, I’ll say that, then. Although, is a heatwave considered a natrual disaster? Not in the US. They do build awfully good levee systems, though. Holland, at least.

  53. matt wrote:

    I’m not sure if your joke is that the Economist is a good or bad newsmag.

    it wasn’t a joke. you can’t read the economist without noticing that they have a distinct point of view. they are far from straight news. and no, it most certainly is not at all liberal, obvious or otherwise. i’m not sure where you got that from, but it couldn’t have been from reading it.

  54. sac wrote:

    I suppose I am conflating a strong opposition to the Bush administration, which the Economist most certainly has, with a liberal stance. On that, you’re right, The Economist isn’t necessarily liberal. Still, the headline bugged me, I don’t care who printed it.

  55. Carla wrote:

    I was wondering why no one was showing the 9th Ward on television newscasts. Reporters stood firmly in one place while reporting that work still needed to be done. They showed views from the air taken last year with the houses sitting in water. They never showed what it looks like from the air today. How many of us are saying, “If I had the money, I’d go there and fix it. I’d hire crews and clean up and then build up.” But most of us don’t have the money and can’t do much. That’s because the government has taken our money for themselves.

    Bush is an idiot, and it gets worse after that.

  56. tom wrote:

    the economist is liberal!??!?! man, i guess ive been reading something else entirely.

    matt, i feel your anger is well justified, both with the administration, and with the fools who want that “both sides of every story” point of view. that isnt reality. in reality, sometimes one side is just wrong.

  57. seamus wrote:

    The Economist is left-leaning? Did you miss their cover stories in 2002 and 2003 about how the US needed to take out Saddam? Did you miss their thousands of editorials about the perils of taxation over the past 100 years or so?

    If pointing out the obvious — that Bush’s fiscal policies are mad and his leadership is inattentive — is “left-leaning,” then I’m not sure I understand your definition of “left.”

  58. sarabeth wrote:

    To Sac:
    In case you’re wondering why everyone’s still jumping on your case even after you culped a mea, it may have something to do with:

    On that, you’re right, The Economist isn’t necessarily liberal.

    Anyone can screw up. But you made it even more absurd by unnecessarily sticking in that “necessarily”.

    It’s not liberal, period. Why was that so hard to say?

  59. sac wrote:

    I admit to not reading enough of the Economist to make an informed judgement on it’s politics. I this case, it doesn’t matter, the headline bugged me, that remains my main point.

  60. ripley wrote:

    nice post.

    I also think the contrast is funny, between Bush’s seemingly limitless power and right to exercise it in terms of phone tapping, military deploying etc etc and the fact that Nagin and Blanco are supposed to completely flummox the entire Federal disaster relief operation and presidential power. The issue of responsibility, and many conservatives like to say, is key. In this case, allocating enough money (and not cutting it for gods sake) is the first responsibility, and overseeing it effectively is the second.

  61. Glen wrote:

    Thank God is wasn’t a heatwave and over 15,000 died like in Europe

    For those that are interested:

    Some six-months after the 2003 heatwave, French researchers noticed an unusual downturn in the deathrate for the period immediately following the heatwave. They concluded that although heat was the proximate cause of death in many of the 15,000 cases cited above, the affected individuals were only marginally hanging onto life otherwise. All things being equal, the deathrate for the six-month period beginning with the first such deaths was neither higher nor lower than average…it was just unusually concentrated during the heatwave. Most of those old people were nearly dead anyway. While this hardly excuses the sometimes-poor treatment of elderly people–especially in cities–it does illustrate how the consequences of the 2003 European summer are NOT comparable to those experienced post-Katarina by Gulf Coast residents.

    (I’m sorry I don’t have a link to the article that explains this…)

  62. matt wrote:

    I also think the contrast is funny, between Bush’s seemingly limitless power and right to exercise it in terms of phone tapping, military deploying etc etc and the fact that Nagin and Blanco are supposed to completely flummox the entire Federal disaster relief operation and presidential power.

    i’ve been making this point for a while now, and no bush supporter has even tried to address this fundamental contradiction. i wonder why…

  63. sarabeth wrote:

    Best to leave the heavy questions to the professionals. Those would be Donald “Fascism” Rumsfeld and Richard “Dick-head” Cheney.

  64. AC wrote:

    Hello,
    I am looking for a Matt Cohen that studied in England in 1986-1987. He was found of Photography. Is this the one ???

  65. matt wrote:

    no

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*