Donald Rumsfeld: STFU!

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (3/30/03):

It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (8/3/06):

Are there still Taliban around? You bet. Are they occupying safe havens in Afghanistan and other places — correction, in Pakistan and other places? Certainly they are. Is the violence up? Yes. Does the violence tend to be up during the summer, in the spring, summer and fall months? Yes it does.

Rummy has had quite the 24 hours: First he lied about troop readiness, then he lied about his past statements on war progress:

I have never painted a rosy picture. I have been very measured in my words, and you’d have a dickens of a time trying to find instances where I have been excessively optimistic. I understand this is tough stuff.

And to cap it all off, he contradicts himself for good measure.

So because he can’t get his stories straight, and by popular demand: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Shut The Fuck Up!

Comments

  1. matt t says:

    Man, I’ll bet those winter months in Afghanistan are fucking awesome.

  2. Nick in Beantown says:

    I smell a made for TV movie in the works: Christmas in Kandahar!

  3. sarabeth says:

    From a different thinkprogress post, three old Rumsfeldisms:

    Dec. 18, 2002: KING: What’s the current situation in Afghanistan? RUMSFELD: It is encouraging. They have elected a government through the Loya Jirga process. The Taliban are gone. The al Qaeda are gone.

    Feb. 7, 2003: “It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.”

    Feb. 20 2003: “‘Do you expect the invasion, if it comes, to be welcomed by the majority of the civilian population of Iraq?’ Jim Lehrer asked the defense secretary on PBS’ The News Hour. ‘There is no question but that they would be welcomed,’ Rumsfeld replied, referring to American forces.”

  4. sarabeth says:

    As I sit back and ponder those three statements, and stroke my chin, I begin to see what Rummsfeld meant. Coming up with statements that can fairly be labelled “excessively optimistic” isn’t all that easy.

    That first statement is a flat-out lie, not excessively optimistic.

    The second one is dangerously deluded, not excessively optimistic.

    The third one is optimistic, yes. But who is to say if it’s overly optimistic or unnecessarily overoptimistic or excessively optimistic?

    The wily old bastard! Why couldn’t he have said: “you’d have a dickens of a time trying to find instances where I have flat out lied” ?