Cheney And Blitzer Loses Their Marbles On CNN (Together)

Take your courage in both hands. And come with me. Deep into the beating heart of The Twilight Zone.

Here’s an excerpt from yesterday evening’s The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Meantime, the insurgency rages on. Nine people died, dozens more were wounded today when bombs ripped through a Baghdad market and two Iraqi checkpoints. The vice president Dick Cheney was asked about the Iraq situation.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

QUESTION: About a year ago, you said that the insurgency in Iraq was in its final throes. Do you still believe this?

RICHARD CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I do. What I was referring to was the series of events that took place in 1995. I think the key turning point, when we get back ten years from now, say, and look back on this period of time with respect to the campaign in Iraq, will be that series of events when the Iraqis increasingly took over responsibility for their own affairs.

(END VIDEO CLIP) BLITZER: The vice president says that looking back now, it’s clear the U.S. underestimated the level of violence in Iraq.

First, let me clarify that the transcript is accurate. This is actually what Cheney said in response to what he was asked. 1995. No challenge by the interviewer. No comment by the interviewer or Wolf Blitzer. My jaw fell to the ground so hard that it bounced back up and clicked back into place. But interviewer and Blitzer didn’t bat an eyelid.

If you ask me, even if you forget the date, the rest of it doesn’t seem to have very much to do with the last throes of the insurgency either, and whether Cheney still believes what he had said, and why.

But how on earth did Wolf Blitzer come up with that paraphrase of what Cheney said? What has the man been smoking?

If Blitzer’s paraphrase makes any kind of sense to anyone, will you please take pity on me and let me know what it means, how the hell he arrived at it, and what relation it bears to Cheney’s statement?

Comments

  1. Nick in Beantown says:

    Could it be that Wolf was actually aware that the VP didn’t answer the question and simply drew his own conclusion? I still find it disturbing that Wolf would toss words, his words, into anyone’s mouth. ick.

    Nah, scratch that. I’m inclined to think that Wolf’s teleprompter expected a different videoclip than the one he got. After all, this was a clip from an interview with Cheney of which we do not have a full transcript. So maybe Big Time, did say something to lead Blitzer to summarize the way he did.

    What I’m wondering, here, is Big Time preparing for the Reagan-style defense we saw w/Iran-Contra? His response was not even sort of tangential and smells like the type of space cadet answer you expect from someone suffering from a degenerative mental condition.

    Weird, indeed.

  2. sarabeth says:

    Nah, scratch that. I’m inclined to think that Wolf’s teleprompter expected a different videoclip than the one he got. After all, this was a clip from an interview with Cheney of which we do not have a full transcript. So maybe Big Time, did say something to lead Blitzer to summarize the way he did.

    Makes more sense than anything I could think of.

    But if he got a different clip than he expected, and he still read from the teleprompter what’s the difference between him and Soledad O’Brien? Or him and JimC, for that matter?

  3. Nick in Beantown says:

    But if he got a different clip than he expected, and he still read from the teleprompter what’s the difference between him and Soledad O’Brien? Or him and JimC, for that matter?

    Between Wolf & Soledad – ZIP, from what I’ve seen…and that’s been a lot considering my morning routine used to involve Soledad. Then, in the evening, the channel being in the same spot as when I left to toil, I would crash into Wolf’s 3 hours of power during primetime.

    With respect to JimC, one would hope there’s a difference. Anchors and television pseudo-journalists are paid to speak as they are told and may not agree or believe the tripe they spew. JimC seems to believe what he says. Whether or not he is paid for his commentary is a question you might ask him.

  4. JimC says:

    JimC seems to believe what he says

    Thanks, I think

  5. sarabeth says:

    JimC seems to believe what he says.

    If you want to go by “seems”, he also seems to have no common sense whatsoever, and very little intelligence, to boot. And not much intellectual honesty either.

  6. JimC says:

    If you want to go by “seems”, he also seems to have no common sense whatsoever, and very little intelligence, to boot. And not much intellectual honesty either.

    Yeah, and he’s a stupid pooh pooh head….c’mon, can’t you do better than that? I mean seriously, I laughed at my Drill Sgt. when he was screaming insults in my face, what makes you think you calling my intelligence into question is going to matter to me?

    Why is it that even though I’m the so called “mentally challenged” one that it is you who resorts to name calling? Is it a sign of intelligence to resort to childish name calling? How many times of you told me to go do something to a duck? I mean how old are you anyway???

  7. sarabeth says:

    he’s a stupid pooh pooh head

    If you say so. Presumably you would know.

    what makes you think you calling my intelligence into question is going to matter to me?

    What makes you think I care in the slightest whether it matters to you?

    How many times of you told me to go do something to a duck?

    Feel free to let me know. How many times of I?

    You want to actually respond any time soon to any of the substantive comments you have chosen to ignore just in the last two days?

  8. sarabeth says:

    Your constant refrain of “you just hate our military” or “you just hate America” or “you’re just a cheerleader for al-Qaeda” is far more childish and far more obscene than anything anyone here has ever said to you.

    Not to mention that it’s totally pathetic too. Have you ever had an original though in your life?

  9. JimC says:

    You want to actually respond any time soon to any of the substantive comments you have chosen to ignore just in the last two days?

    Perhaps if the personal attacks hadn’t been mixed in I might have…

    Your constant refrain of “you just hate our military” or “you just hate America” or “you’re just a cheerleader for al-Qaeda” is far more childish and far more obscene than anything anyone here has ever said to you.

    Not to mention that it’s totally pathetic too. Have you ever had an original though in your life?

    Oh really? I wonder how many of our troops would agree with that…

  10. sarabeth says:

    Just so I get it straight, “go swing from the dick of a dead duck” is a personal attack. And “you just hate our military” or “you just hate America” or “you’re just a cheerleader for al-Qaeda” is not?

    At least my insults are clearly labelled “insult” and don’t masquerade as the truth about you, or what you think, or what you feel.

    You’re intellectually dishonest even with your insults and attacks.

  11. JimC says:

    “you just hate our military” or “you just hate America” or “you’re just a cheerleader for al-Qaeda” is not?

    This is just from your psoting trend, and I don’t think I said you hate America but you think of us as the “problem”, not a personal attack. It is a opinion summized from your trend of only posting negative articles about our government and our troops, plain and simple, nothing personal about it…

  12. sarabeth says:

    You have said, multiple times, that I hate the military. You did say that I’m cheering for those who want America to burn.

    I regard those allegations as an obscene impugning of my values and character. Very much a personal attack.

    Anyway, at this point I’m going to quit. I hereby withdraw to the Himalayas, where I will contemplate my navel for an eternity or two.

  13. JimC says:

    sarabeth said:
    June 21st, 2006 at 7:08 am
    You have said, multiple times, that I hate the military. You did say that I’m cheering for those who want America to burn.

    Let me put another way, how do you feel about the military? Feel good, warm and fuzzy when you see a soldier in service? How would you feel about a military recruiter coming to a local highschool to speak about opportunities in the service (including the Air Force and Navy, non ground pounders)? Would ya’ feel good about that?

  14. Can Wolf Blitzer Survive The Latest Middle East Conflict?

    On a much lighter note than the previous two posts, I saw Wolf Blitzer on CNN tonight. They finally talked him into getting out of the “Situation Room” and over to Israel. Of course he’s in Jerusalem, as far away from rockets coming from either north or south of Israel as you can get right now.

    He “interviewed” Benjamin Netanyahu tonight. He allowed Netanyahu to overpower him with a monologue that Wolf wasn’t able to stop. He didn’t know what to ask and he wasn’t strong enough to stop Netanyahu to ask a tough question. He looked as if he was in a coma as Netanyahu went on and on giving the party line.

    I can’t see Wolfy in the Situation Room much longer. Not when CNN has a real journalist, John Roberts from CBS, under contract.

    Wolf’s delivery is so monotone and dull that the Situation Room is the only news program on TV where they have to have a snare drum playing in the background while he announces headlines.

    Get it over with, CNN. Replace Wolf with Roberts and you can drop the drum as a way of trying to introduce drama into the headlines.