Our Curious Response To The Guantanamo Suicides

Who’s been studying Kafka in the Bush-Cheney-Pace-Rumsfeld military, and treating it as a manual? (Probably not Bush, right?)

After the recent Guantanamo suicides, although the military portrayed the suicides variously as “an act of asymmetrical warfare” and a “good PR move to draw attention”, much of the world insisted on seeing the suicides as acts of despair, triggered by the prospect of being detained indefinitely under non-Geneva convention conditions:

Ken Roth, head of Human Rights Watch in New York, told the BBC the men had probably been driven by despair.

“These people are despairing because they are being held lawlessly,” he said.

“There’s no end in sight. They’re not being brought before any independent judges. They’re not being charged and convicted for any crime.”

In a Kafkaesque nightmare, what is the proper next move by the authorities? You suspend even the limited and possibly tainted legal proceedings that are under way:

The defence department has suspended all military trials for suspects at the US detention camp.

No reason was given for the move announced in a Pentagon statement.

Comments

  1. Nick in Beantown says:

    The defence department has suspended all military trials for suspects at the US detention camp.

    They also kicked-out all the reporters.

  2. JimC says:

    I have a great idea! Adopt-a-detainee program! Yes, all you people who think the detainees are harmless scared people held against their will for no good reason, then here’s your chance! Volunteer to adopt a GITMO detainee and bring him home! They’ve had their shots, most of them are potty trained, and all of them come with certified papers! Call now!

    Seriously, what do you sugest we do with these people? Send them to Disney World?

  3. sarabeth says:

    Seriously, what do you sugest we do with these people? Send them to Disney World?

    No, we should just say we were going to free them anyway because they had done nothing wrong. And we should say this right after they commit suicide. And under no circumstances should we say it in less than two years, at a minimum.

  4. JimC says:

    No, we should just say we were going to free them anyway because they had done nothing wrong. And we should say this right after they commit suicide. And under no circumstances should we say it unless than two years at a minimum.

    So that’s a free them but not in my back yard answer?

  5. sarabeth says:

    No, it’s actually a “You’re fucked again” answer, if you had the wit to recognize that.