Some people don’t enjoy it when the administration is accused of lying. Standards sure do change.
Here’s what I want to know: If they didn’t lie to get us into the Iraq war (WMDs, ties to terrorism), how are they not fantastically inept for not being about to find said WMDs/ties to terrorism? Obviously the pat answer has become “Iraq is a big country, and the borders are porous.” Since everything after an invasion is covered by Colin Powell‘s “You broke it, you bought it” rule (not to mention Omar Little‘s “All in the game, yo” credo”) don’t they need to be held accountable?
So which is it? Did they lie or did they totally fuck up the hunt? Sorry, there’s no third choice.