<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How It Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Tobey</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12945</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Tobey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12945</guid>
		<description>Looks like Alex might have already had his fill of our loathesomeness. Either that or he got deployed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Alex might have already had his fill of our loathesomeness. Either that or he got deployed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: screwtape</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12941</link>
		<dc:creator>screwtape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12941</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;just donâ€™t expect to have any influence on what we do. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
sounds kind of like one of those sports fans who so closely identifies with his team he refers to them as &quot;us&quot;.  &quot;We beat the redskins last week.&quot;  Oh, you did, did you? That&#039;s funny.  I don&#039;t recall seeing you in uniform.

&quot;We won the election! We have political capital we are going to spend! Whoooo!&quot; 

So, Alex, unless you won an election or work in the Whitehouse, perhaps as Karl Rove&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2006/01/leather-slave-only-knows-how-to-be.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leatherslave&lt;/a&gt;, get a grip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>just donâ€™t expect to have any influence on what we do. </p></blockquote>
<p>sounds kind of like one of those sports fans who so closely identifies with his team he refers to them as &#8220;us&#8221;.  &#8220;We beat the redskins last week.&#8221;  Oh, you did, did you? That&#8217;s funny.  I don&#8217;t recall seeing you in uniform.</p>
<p>&#8220;We won the election! We have political capital we are going to spend! Whoooo!&#8221; </p>
<p>So, Alex, unless you won an election or work in the Whitehouse, perhaps as Karl Rove&#8217;s <a href="http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2006/01/leather-slave-only-knows-how-to-be.html" rel="nofollow">leatherslave</a>, get a grip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: screwtape</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12940</link>
		<dc:creator>screwtape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12940</guid>
		<description>I used to adore the word &quot;loathe&quot;. I used it often.  Now, I am going to have to find a different word. Alex ruined it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to adore the word &#8220;loathe&#8221;. I used it often.  Now, I am going to have to find a different word. Alex ruined it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyview satellite</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12938</link>
		<dc:creator>skyview satellite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12938</guid>
		<description>Jules: Oh man, I will never forgive yo ass for this. This is some fucked-up, repugnant shit. 
Vincent: Jules, did you ever hear the philosophy that once a man admits he&#039;s wrong, then he&#039;s automatically forgiven of that wrongdoing? 
Jules: Man, get out of my face with that shit. The motherfucker who said that never had to pick up itty bitty pieces of skull on account of your dumb ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jules: Oh man, I will never forgive yo ass for this. This is some fucked-up, repugnant shit.<br />
Vincent: Jules, did you ever hear the philosophy that once a man admits he&#8217;s wrong, then he&#8217;s automatically forgiven of that wrongdoing?<br />
Jules: Man, get out of my face with that shit. The motherfucker who said that never had to pick up itty bitty pieces of skull on account of your dumb ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otter</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12936</link>
		<dc:creator>Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12936</guid>
		<description>&quot;what I LOATHE, is your insistance on casting EVERYTHING in a negative light.&quot;

There is something positive in this confrontation Alex? I&#039;m sorry I must have missed it, I was busy cleaning the blood out of my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what I LOATHE, is your insistance on casting EVERYTHING in a negative light.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is something positive in this confrontation Alex? I&#8217;m sorry I must have missed it, I was busy cleaning the blood out of my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCeiver</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12935</link>
		<dc:creator>DCeiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12935</guid>
		<description>Our good friend Alex has an a priori problem.  You see, Alex, if the DECISIONS weren&#039;t so stupid, so crackheaded, there&#039;d be no room to criticize!  So, you should go yell at George Bush, and convince him that he needs to make better decisions.

Here&#039;s a Hint: Attacking a country of no strategic importance in order to turn it into an al Qaeda playground and guarantee that it will be plunged into a civil war (an obvious outcome considering the &quot;nation&quot; of &quot;Iraq&quot; is an arbitrary line drawn around three groups of people who despise each other by British people who were glossing over their own crackheaded decisions of earlier decades)=a BAD DECISION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our good friend Alex has an a priori problem.  You see, Alex, if the DECISIONS weren&#8217;t so stupid, so crackheaded, there&#8217;d be no room to criticize!  So, you should go yell at George Bush, and convince him that he needs to make better decisions.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a Hint: Attacking a country of no strategic importance in order to turn it into an al Qaeda playground and guarantee that it will be plunged into a civil war (an obvious outcome considering the &#8220;nation&#8221; of &#8220;Iraq&#8221; is an arbitrary line drawn around three groups of people who despise each other by British people who were glossing over their own crackheaded decisions of earlier decades)=a BAD DECISION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyview satellite</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12934</link>
		<dc:creator>skyview satellite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12934</guid>
		<description>Alex, you have indeed perfectly articulated my personal position with regards to the Bush administration and the GOP: I intend to be critical of everything, everything, everything, everything they do at every turn. I can honestly promise that at no point in the future will I ever say anything like, &quot;You know, I think Cheney was correct on that one point.&quot; Fuck him always.

Should this leave you anything to feel positive about as you continue your humble and noble search for middle ground? Well, there is this: most of the national and global malice directed at Bush and his ilk seems to be limited to them, their policies, their philosophies, and their activities. It has yet to fully extend to their extrapolitical supporters. There is as of yet no reason to assume that every GOP supporter is also a criminal, a spy, an anti-intellectual vandal, a dishonest, amoral Machiavellian racketeer, a senseless bungler and a bullying smart-ass who is actively dismantling the constitutional rule of law in my country. No reason at all. Surely we can agree on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, you have indeed perfectly articulated my personal position with regards to the Bush administration and the GOP: I intend to be critical of everything, everything, everything, everything they do at every turn. I can honestly promise that at no point in the future will I ever say anything like, &#8220;You know, I think Cheney was correct on that one point.&#8221; Fuck him always.</p>
<p>Should this leave you anything to feel positive about as you continue your humble and noble search for middle ground? Well, there is this: most of the national and global malice directed at Bush and his ilk seems to be limited to them, their policies, their philosophies, and their activities. It has yet to fully extend to their extrapolitical supporters. There is as of yet no reason to assume that every GOP supporter is also a criminal, a spy, an anti-intellectual vandal, a dishonest, amoral Machiavellian racketeer, a senseless bungler and a bullying smart-ass who is actively dismantling the constitutional rule of law in my country. No reason at all. Surely we can agree on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12932</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12932</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That sort of hatred-based criticism is not only absolutely useless, but counterproductive to even your own supposed goals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What are my goals, chief?

&lt;blockquote&gt;It demonstrates quite clearly that youâ€™re not opposed to any one aspect of the ongoing operations, but to the entire concept of US troops being in Iraq.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

and?

&lt;blockquote&gt;I have a much better understanding of the situation on the ground than you could ever hope to aquire&lt;/blockquote&gt;

sorry, we&#039;ll need some kind of proof.  or else don&#039;t try to puff yourself up.

&lt;blockquote&gt;However, your constant criticism of EVERY aspect of the operations makes it clear that you wonâ€™t be happy untill all operations cease.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

that or some semblance of competence thus-far beyond the reach of the clowns in power.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And more than likely, if we were to pull out today youâ€™d then proceed to criticize us for letting Iraq descend into civil war. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

i have some news for you:  they are in civil war.  and even if you want to believe otherwise, i&#039;m sorry.  but either way, the bush administration policies have closed off many options.  the decision to go to war unprepared in the first place sealed this fate.

&lt;blockquote&gt;In other words, thereâ€™s absolutely nothing we can do to please you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

we?  are you in the administration?

&lt;blockquote&gt; Itâ€™s like the Palestine/Israel debate - itâ€™s become quite clear over time that the majority of Israelâ€™s critics wonâ€™t be happy untill Israel ceases to exist.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

it&#039;s always productive to use that as an example.  always.

&lt;blockquote&gt;YOU wonâ€™t be happy untill Bush is out of office &lt;/blockquote&gt;

that&#039;s not even true.  i&#039;ll be really happy if the dems manage not to screw up the elections and get subpoena power.  that would be 2 years before C+ Augustus is out of office.

&lt;blockquote&gt;instead of making an effort to find some middle-ground, you cling to your extremeist ideology as if it were not only realistic but the only possible solution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

why again is it my responsibility to find this mythic middle ground?  isn&#039;t the president supposed to be the uniter not divider?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Keep it up if you want, just donâ€™t expect to have any influence on what we do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

show me a non-republican who does have any influence on what &quot;we&quot; do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That sort of hatred-based criticism is not only absolutely useless, but counterproductive to even your own supposed goals.</p></blockquote>
<p>What are my goals, chief?</p>
<blockquote><p>It demonstrates quite clearly that youâ€™re not opposed to any one aspect of the ongoing operations, but to the entire concept of US troops being in Iraq.</p></blockquote>
<p>and?</p>
<blockquote><p>I have a much better understanding of the situation on the ground than you could ever hope to aquire</p></blockquote>
<p>sorry, we&#8217;ll need some kind of proof.  or else don&#8217;t try to puff yourself up.</p>
<blockquote><p>However, your constant criticism of EVERY aspect of the operations makes it clear that you wonâ€™t be happy untill all operations cease.</p></blockquote>
<p>that or some semblance of competence thus-far beyond the reach of the clowns in power.</p>
<blockquote><p>And more than likely, if we were to pull out today youâ€™d then proceed to criticize us for letting Iraq descend into civil war. </p></blockquote>
<p>i have some news for you:  they are in civil war.  and even if you want to believe otherwise, i&#8217;m sorry.  but either way, the bush administration policies have closed off many options.  the decision to go to war unprepared in the first place sealed this fate.</p>
<blockquote><p>In other words, thereâ€™s absolutely nothing we can do to please you.</p></blockquote>
<p>we?  are you in the administration?</p>
<blockquote><p> Itâ€™s like the Palestine/Israel debate &#8211; itâ€™s become quite clear over time that the majority of Israelâ€™s critics wonâ€™t be happy untill Israel ceases to exist.</p></blockquote>
<p>it&#8217;s always productive to use that as an example.  always.</p>
<blockquote><p>YOU wonâ€™t be happy untill Bush is out of office </p></blockquote>
<p>that&#8217;s not even true.  i&#8217;ll be really happy if the dems manage not to screw up the elections and get subpoena power.  that would be 2 years before C+ Augustus is out of office.</p>
<blockquote><p>instead of making an effort to find some middle-ground, you cling to your extremeist ideology as if it were not only realistic but the only possible solution.</p></blockquote>
<p>why again is it my responsibility to find this mythic middle ground?  isn&#8217;t the president supposed to be the uniter not divider?</p>
<blockquote><p>Keep it up if you want, just donâ€™t expect to have any influence on what we do.</p></blockquote>
<p>show me a non-republican who does have any influence on what &#8220;we&#8221; do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12929</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12929</guid>
		<description>Alex, you&#039;re palpably upset that the Iraq war is shown in a negative light here on 1115. You simply can&#039;t envision a scenario where positive things would be said about the situation in Iraq. I disagree. I think that even the &quot;liberal&quot; media would report large-scale successes in Iraq if they were occurring. But they aren&#039;t. The highest level of debate about Iraq right now is primarily concerned with whether or not the conflict is a sustained insurgency or a civil war. Either way, tens of thousands of Iraqs are dead and there is no end in sight.

That doesn&#039;t mean that small-scale successes aren&#039;t being made and reported on by the media; look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200604/coming-normalcy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this month&#039;s Atlantic&lt;/a&gt; if you want to see that in action.

I&#039;m going to pull out a card that I very rarely use, because I feel that it isn&#039;t generally conducive to conversation. In this case, however, I think it&#039;s warranted.

I fought in that war, Alex, so you&#039;ll forgive me if I think that your label of &quot;armchair tactician&quot; does not apply to me. I can tell you firsthand about how naive the mindset of our commanders was; everyone in the brass was convinced by the administration&#039;s &quot;We shall be greeted as liberators&quot; dogma. The invasion was brutal and horrifying (as all armed conflict is) but it was a cakewalk by 20th century war standards. Caught between the notions of being liberators and being a small dynamic force, we had neither the training nor the personnel to win the peace afterwards.

And that&#039;s why so many people, including many of those here at 1115 are negative about the war. If you think our couching of the war in critical terms is tiresome, realize that we only do it to counterpoint the constant unwarranted and unrealistic positivity of the Bush administration and the uncritical media mouthpieces that speak for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, you&#8217;re palpably upset that the Iraq war is shown in a negative light here on 1115. You simply can&#8217;t envision a scenario where positive things would be said about the situation in Iraq. I disagree. I think that even the &#8220;liberal&#8221; media would report large-scale successes in Iraq if they were occurring. But they aren&#8217;t. The highest level of debate about Iraq right now is primarily concerned with whether or not the conflict is a sustained insurgency or a civil war. Either way, tens of thousands of Iraqs are dead and there is no end in sight.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that small-scale successes aren&#8217;t being made and reported on by the media; look at <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200604/coming-normalcy" rel="nofollow">this month&#8217;s Atlantic</a> if you want to see that in action.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to pull out a card that I very rarely use, because I feel that it isn&#8217;t generally conducive to conversation. In this case, however, I think it&#8217;s warranted.</p>
<p>I fought in that war, Alex, so you&#8217;ll forgive me if I think that your label of &#8220;armchair tactician&#8221; does not apply to me. I can tell you firsthand about how naive the mindset of our commanders was; everyone in the brass was convinced by the administration&#8217;s &#8220;We shall be greeted as liberators&#8221; dogma. The invasion was brutal and horrifying (as all armed conflict is) but it was a cakewalk by 20th century war standards. Caught between the notions of being liberators and being a small dynamic force, we had neither the training nor the personnel to win the peace afterwards.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why so many people, including many of those here at 1115 are negative about the war. If you think our couching of the war in critical terms is tiresome, realize that we only do it to counterpoint the constant unwarranted and unrealistic positivity of the Bush administration and the uncritical media mouthpieces that speak for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-12902</link>
		<dc:creator>sarabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1115.org/2006/03/21/how-it-is/#comment-12902</guid>
		<description>Just some random thoughts.

--A little late in the day to try to sound reasonable? 
--Alex: the lean, mean, one-man loathe machine
--&quot;I have no problem with well founded constructive criticizm&quot; -- try practicing what you preach, buddy
--&quot;YOU wonâ€™t be happy untill Bush is out of office and the US ceases all international operations.&quot;  Not even close.  First he has to be impeached, yes.  (Where did &quot;cease all international operations come from?&quot;  We just get out of Iraq and shut down Guantanamo.)  Then we put Bush on public display in the Washington mall, in some appropriate 21st century version of the stocks, for 2 weeks.  Then we let graduates of Abu Ghraib subject him to 4 weeks of the perfectly legal interrogation tactics we practiced there.  He gets to sleep for 4 hours at that point.  A quick extraordinary rendition later, we give the Guantanamo graduates equal rights for 4 weeks in some remote desert country or uninhabited island.  Unsupervised.  He gets to sleep once in a while, but all food intake is via force-feeding.  Then itâ€™s Cindy Sheehanâ€™s turn. And then after thatâ€¦ 
--Why do the JimCs and Alexes of this world always have such poor spelling skills?
--Mind-reading isnâ€™t your forte, baby.  Cease and desist.
--A merry christmas and a very happy new year to you too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just some random thoughts.</p>
<p>&#8211;A little late in the day to try to sound reasonable?<br />
&#8211;Alex: the lean, mean, one-man loathe machine<br />
&#8211;&#8221;I have no problem with well founded constructive criticizm&#8221; &#8212; try practicing what you preach, buddy<br />
&#8211;&#8221;YOU wonâ€™t be happy untill Bush is out of office and the US ceases all international operations.&#8221;  Not even close.  First he has to be impeached, yes.  (Where did &#8220;cease all international operations come from?&#8221;  We just get out of Iraq and shut down Guantanamo.)  Then we put Bush on public display in the Washington mall, in some appropriate 21st century version of the stocks, for 2 weeks.  Then we let graduates of Abu Ghraib subject him to 4 weeks of the perfectly legal interrogation tactics we practiced there.  He gets to sleep for 4 hours at that point.  A quick extraordinary rendition later, we give the Guantanamo graduates equal rights for 4 weeks in some remote desert country or uninhabited island.  Unsupervised.  He gets to sleep once in a while, but all food intake is via force-feeding.  Then itâ€™s Cindy Sheehanâ€™s turn. And then after thatâ€¦<br />
&#8211;Why do the JimCs and Alexes of this world always have such poor spelling skills?<br />
&#8211;Mind-reading isnâ€™t your forte, baby.  Cease and desist.<br />
&#8211;A merry christmas and a very happy new year to you too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

