Doth Protesting Too Much

funeralprogram.jpg

I hadn’t originally planned to write about the passing of Coretta Scott King, not because it isn’t an important loss, but because I’m still mourning the void left behind by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. But the combination of the absurd reaction to a few of the speakers at her funeral and a memory from my childhood changed my mind.

I had the honor of meeting Mrs. King when I was maybe 10 years old. My family was flying to Florida on vacation and we had a connection in Atlanta. As we were making our way to the gate, a large entourage headed in our direction, clearly surrounding a VIP. But it wasn’t anyone I knew; in fact my father had to explain who it was. At that young an age, I had only a vague understanding of Dr. King, and even less of a clue as to why his wife warranted the attention shown to her by nearly everyone else in the terminal. But when I noticed my father’s reaction, it hit me: my father, not known for his enlightened stance on race or gender relations was awestruck by a black woman. I don’t remember much else about that day, but that feeling will be with me for the rest of my life. Some people are so special that they transcend prejudice, class and racial lines, and plain old bad habits. For continuing her late husband’s work long after his death, Mrs. King was certainly one of those people. Through hard work against an unrelenting tide of opposition, she, like Dr. King, left the world a better place than she found it.

At her funeral on Tuesday, 10,000 people packed an Atlanta-area church, including President George W. Bush and former Presidents Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Many distinguished leaders, both political and religious, gave speeches eulogizing Mrs. King. Clinton challenged us to “model her behavior” and Carter reminded us that both Dr. and Mrs. King “…changed America, [but] were not appreciated even at the highest level of government. It was difficult for them personally — with the civil liberties of both husband and wife violated as they became the target of secret government wiretapping, other surveillance…and as you know, harassment from the FBI.” But the speaker who drew as much applause as Clinton and more ire from Republicans was Reverend Joseph Lowery:

lowerybushes.jpg

“We know now there were no weapons of mass destruction over there [standing ovation]…
But Coretta knew and we know that there are weapons of misdirection right down here.
Millions without health insurance. Poverty abounds.
For war billions more but no more for the poor.”

Not surprisingly, Lowery’s quote has the right in a frenzy. Apparently this is one of those times that they like to talk about on The Daily Show where the facts are biased. Setting aside the WMD comment which is true, but an obvious rhetorical device, on what grounds can any sitting Republican criticize or refute Lowery’s points on the treatment of poor Americans, the overwhelming percentage of whom are black? Do they deny their own data showing that the rates of those in poverty and lacking insurance are rising? Are they forgetting the foundation of their ruling majority, the racist “southern strategy,” that despite chatter to the contrary is still in full effect? Are we supposed to pretend that we didn’t hear their post-Katrina comments filled with discrimination, hate and condescension? And as long as we’re on the subject, would they rather we not ask why Bush used a recess appointment to put racist judge Charles Pickering on the federal appellate bench on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. day, 2004?

These are all things that Dr. and Mrs. King spent their lives fighting. Who could argue that these ideas didn’t belong at her funeral? Well, Rush Limbaugh, Kate O’Beirne, Glenn Reynolds, Michelle Malkin, Redstate and many more. I guess we’re just supposed to think these things rather than say them.

Remember, funerals for Republican politicians can be 14-day-long advertisements that result in sainthood, but should any Democrat dare speak a political word, look out.

It’s time for Republicans to get real on race. Pandering for votes and feigning outrage while supporting racist political strategies and allowing poverty to rise with each new year are incompatible.

someonesmissing.jpg

Who’s missing…?

Comments

  1. I am not, nor are you, qualified to make it unless perhaps you’re black…

    So blacks are qualified to make the argument? Then I guess it’s good you linked to Steve Gilliard. Dude’s black.

    Also, stop calling the Southern Strategy an opinion. The Southern Strategy is real, and nothing you can say will change that. This, on the other hand, is some motherfucking opinion:

    I think it is racists to keep minorities strung along with campaign promises from ddemocrats only later to not deliver, or to fight for government welfare programs that keep them dependant on the government rather than provide a path to independence

    And why do you say you’re done with the argument, right before you continue fighting it? How many Jim’s are in that little noggin of yours?

  2. PS I intentionally ignored your Fox News links. Shove them up your ass.

  3. marc says:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,107978,00.html

    They were the same race. That’s like me calling you a cracker.

  4. sarabeth says:

    nothing you can do or any poll you cite is going to change my view and nothign I say will change yours, so, good day, I said good day!

    This I don’t believe. You don’t even know how to throw a tantrum?

    After you go “so, good day, I said good day!” you are required by international law to stomp offstage and sulk for a good long while (the rest of the day at least), not be back within one minute.

  5. sarabeth says:

    This argument won’t be solved here and I am not, nor are you, qualified to make it unless perhaps you’re black…

    Didn’t stop you from making it though, did it?

  6. This argument won’t be solved here and I am not, nor are you, qualified to make it unless perhaps you’re black…

    So blacks are the only ones allowed to argue about racism? Are the 98% that disapprove of Bush allowed to argue too, or just that 2%?

  7. Ken says:

    The Washington Post recently reported on a paper presented at this year’ annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology which showed that “supporters of President Bush and other conservatives had stronger self-admitted and implicit biases against blacks than liberals did.”

    Of course, this could mean a lot of things (e.g., Dems are more in denial about race), but the study offers evidence that Republicans (and Bush supporters) *themselves* acknowledge their own racial bias.

  8. screwtape says:

    Man, I can hardly believe the beating Jim is taking today. He is really getting thrashed. It’s like Jimmy Walker against Mike Tyson. And Jimmy Walker is blindfolded with his hands tied behind his back.

  9. JimC says:

    Matthew Tobey Says:

    February 9th, 2006 at 9:51 am
    PS I intentionally ignored your Fox News links. Shove them up your ass.

    P.S. You can fidn your own link to the story elsewhere. The racism still exists


    WASHINGTON — In a variation on an old theme, a Hispanic supporter of Howard Dean called a Latina Republican Senate candidate a “house Mexican” who is not being true to her race.

    And by the way, Mathew Tobey, I’ve concluded you must be about 12 years old or have Tourettes Syndrome, which is it?

  10. And by the way, Mathew Tobey, I’ve concluded you must be about 12 years old or have Tourettes Syndrome, which is it?

    12? Tourettes? But, I thought I was an elitist. Which is it? You know, I live in Detroit, not far from Ohio. Let me know if you want to get together sometime and you can diagnose me in person. Nullus.

    Do you find it peculiar that the only cases of alleged racism you were able to dig up are about hispanic comments abou hispanics and black comments about blacks? I do.

    Also, I thought you were done with this argument.

    Also, I thought only black people could argue about racism.

    Also, Tourettes Syndrome is a real affliction that real people are struggling with every day. You know, kind of the way you struggle with classlessness.

  11. # Ken Says:
    February 9th, 2006 at 10:19 am

    The Washington Post recently reported on a paper presented at this year’ annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology which showed that “supporters of President Bush and other conservatives had stronger self-admitted and implicit biases against blacks than liberals did.”

    Of course, this could mean a lot of things (e.g., Dems are more in denial about race), but the study offers evidence that Republicans (and Bush supporters) *themselves* acknowledge their own racial bias.

    Jim doesn’t believe in studies and polls, except, of course, for the times when he does.

  12. marc says:

    That is an example of name-calling, not racism. Racism is not directed towards your own race.

  13. sarabeth says:

    Jimmy, when people feel the need to start spelling out for you that 2+2 makes 4, that’s a bad sign.

    BTW, does “2+2=4″ fall in the category of science you believe in or science that you don’t believe in?

    How about “e=mc squared”?

  14. rob says:

    i have called every place possible, from the detroit free press news desk (i too hail from the motored city) all the way up to the Barbara Bush Foundation in DC and no one can tell me why BBush wasn’t in the house for the services.
    has anyone found the answer to this yet?

  15. Nick in Beantown says:

    They were the same race. That’s like me calling you a cracker.

    Crackah, pleez!!

    (sorry, I couldn’t help myself)

  16. How about “e=mc squared”?

    That’s just a theory! Get it out of the schools!

  17. JimC says:

    Oh well, I guess Me and my racists pals will just sit over here watching you elitists dangle the carrot in front of the very poor you proclaim to champion….over and out

  18. JimC says:

    >I live in Detroit, not far from Ohio. Let me know if you want to get together sometime and you can diagnose me in person.

    I’m only about 2 hours south of you, if you’re feeling spunky, matter of fact I was just there in Detroit a few months ago for the Microsoft Launch of Visual Studio 2005, we should have met then…darn the bad luck, I’m always in the mood for looking down on twerps…

  19. matt says:

    over and out

    your mouth is writing checks your body can’t cash

  20. JimC says:

    >your mouth is writing checks your body can’t cash

    Whatever….

  21. JimC says:

    sarabeth Says:

    February 9th, 2006 at 12:10 pm
    Jimmy, when people feel the need to start spelling out for you that 2+2 makes 4, that’s a bad sign.

    BTW, does “2+2=4″ fall in the category of science you believe in or science that you don’t believe in?

    How about “e=mc squared”?

    No ma’am, 10 + 10 = 4….

  22. JimC says:

    >No ma’am, 10 + 10 = 4….

    I thought for sure someone would ask about this….oh well

  23. we don’t like binary jokes, nerd