Sarabeth Battles Her Worst Nightmare By Escaping Into Fantasy

So a woman’s right to choose is now on its way to becoming a thing of the past (anyone know what odds are being offered that Roe versus Wade will be overturned in the next five years?).

I don’t know what you are doing to console yourself, but I’m falling back on the last refuge of the truly helpless – fantasy.

Tonight, when President Bush arrives for the State of the Union address, there’s going to be an unexpected crush of Democrats reaching out to shake his hand. Several of them will be wearing Medici style rings, filled with a powerful hypnotic. The twelfth, and last one, to prick Bush with a ring (even my sources could not tell me to whom this honor falls), will lean over and whisper in Bush’s ear just before he takes the podium.

Bush’s entire address will consist of:
“Mr. Speaker, Vice President Cheney, members of Congress, my fellow Americans,

I can’t bear it any more. I’ve been the worst President anyone could possibly be. You gave me your trust and I lied to you. I let you down. I lied about Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction. I lied about a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. I led you into a needless war. I’m responsible for the unnecessary deaths of more than 2,000 Americans and more than 30,000 Iraqis. I promised to restore honor and dignity to the office of the President, and my administration gave you only sleaze instead. I totally botched the response to Katrina. What’s the point of going on with this list? I totally screwed up everything.

I hereby fire Dick Cheney as Vice-President, effective immediately.

I hereby appoint (name withheld for security reasons right now) as Vice-President in his place.

I hereby resign from the office of the President of the United States, effective immediately.”

And he will then gouge out his eyes at the podium, before he is led away.

Comments

  1. JimC says:

    Why stop there, “Should a woman who has a unwanted 1 week old, be able to legally kill it?” About as stupid….

  2. screwtape says:

    It’s comments like this, Jim, that make everyone else think you are such an asshole. To be frank, my first reaction was “what an asshole”. So was my third.

    (and many others) argue that the foetus becomes a baby when it is capable of surviving on its own outside the mother. A month-old foetus is a bundle of tissue. A six-month-old foetus is essentially a baby, hence the common liberal opposition to late-term abortions.

    Mainly, Jim, you give the impression you do not want to understand any perspective but your own. You just seem to want to pass judgement and throw gasoline on the fire.

  3. you’re such an elitist, screwtape.

  4. screwtape says:

    you’re such an elitist, screwtape

    I am comfortable with that.

  5. JimC says:

    Mainly, Jim, you give the impression you do not want to understand any perspective but your own. You just seem to want to pass judgement and throw gasoline on the fire.

    No my comment was basically to show the illogical argument of declaring a fetus as not legally protected by law when essentially there is not much difference between a fetus at 9 months which has no legal protection and a 1 day old baby…yet the pro-choice crowd goes to extreme lengths to block *any* legal definition of protection of *any* unborn child as that would set in motion a legal challenge to set a limit on when an abortion can take place….see the cascading effect?

  6. No my comment was basically to show the illogical argument of declaring a fetus as not legally protected by law when essentially there is not much difference between a fetus at 9 months which has no legal protection and a 1 day old baby…yet the pro-choice crowd goes to extreme lengths to block *any* legal definition of protection of *any* unborn child as that would set in motion a legal challenge to set a limit on when an abortion can take place….see the cascading effect?

    Anybody have the stats on the number of abortions performed in the ninth-month that don’t involve a threat to the mother’s life? I’d look it up, but I’m busy reading the latest issue of Elitist Monthly. I’d recommend you all read it, but it’s so exclusive that you actually have to be invitited by the publishers to read it.

  7. yet the pro-choice crowd goes to extreme lengths

    By “extreme” you mean like clinic-bombings and doctor-shootings, right?

  8. JimC says:

    By “extreme” you mean like clinic-bombings and doctor-shootings, right?

    Ahhh, yes, and you’re right, this is very misguided actions by extremely disturbed people…

    However, it still doesn’t excuse those who stop at nothing to make sure that absolutely no protective rights are granted to the unborn child. These groups were upset when Scott Peterson(sp?) was charge with a “double” homocide because that meant the unborn child was “murdered”…..

  9. screwtape says:

    who stop at nothing

    They stop at illegal activities. So, I would say what they do is excusable.

    These groups were upset when Scott Peterson(sp?) was charge with a “double” homocide because that meant the unborn child was “murdered”

    Because it sets a legal precident that erodes what we believe is a correct ruling in Roe v Wade. Just as you would be upset if they did NOT charge him with a double homicide.

  10. K,D, says:

    good for you…i agree with you and love what you said. Bush is a total idiot, a drunken bum who did not win the vote of the people…but rather was given it by his good buddy the judge who decided the people had no right to elect the president…he would just choose for them! You go girl!

  11. sarabeth says:

    Just curious: how did you discover this two-year old post?

    (Nothing like reading two-year-old stuff and deciding it stands up well to the test of time.)