Michelle Malkin: STFU!

Posted by on . 40 comments.

m5.jpg
(image from 100monkeystyping)

I took a pass on Michelle Malkin when her book first came out because I honestly didn’t want to contaminate this site with anything as vile and hateful. Her book (which I will neither name or link to) suggests that interring the Japanese during WWII was a good idea and should be applied to Arabs and other “darkies” now. I say again: An Asian-American woman using the detention of Japanese families as a blueprint.

Her appearance on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher was the first time I saw her on TV, and it was a fitting introduction. She got her ass handed back to her by Maher, D.L. Hughley and former Clinton aide and current Congressman Rahm Emanuel on every issue that came up while receiving loud rounds of boos from the studio audience. She was totally unable to do what she came there to do (defend the administration) and was forced to concede several arguments.

This week, she has taken a bit of incoming fire. Most of it was more personal than professional which is (most of the time) beside the point which is: she is a hate-filled hack who shills for a party who would probably just as soon inter her with all the other people-who-look-different. There’s more than enough material to keep things civil.

My quaint little notion of fair play was strangled and disemboweled by Malkin’s own words Thursday night on Hardball where she brought up the idea that John Kerry‘s Vietnam wounds were self-inflicted. She had no evidence, and no explanation for how Kerry could have injured himself with a hand grenade. Nothing but empty accusations.

There’s something to say about always taking the high road, but when the Republicans trot out irresponsible “writers” like this to attack Kerry, all bets are off.

Kerry seems to have decided that he’s had about all he can stomach of this nonsense. Today he came out with a new speech and TV ad:

Of course, the President keeps telling people he would never question my service to our country. Instead, he watches as a Republican-funded attack group does just that. Well, if he wants to have a debate about our service in Vietnam, here is my answer: ‘Bring it on.’

The President appears content to watch from the sidelines and let Malkin draw the attention. What a perfect job for a dumber, uglier, but just as psychotic version of Ann Coulter.

After Matthews laid the smackdown on Hardball it’s almost redundant, but Michelle Malkin, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

**UPDATE: Keith Olbermann and Matthews discuss Malkin. Read the Hardball transcript here.

***ANOTHER UPDATE: I hate myself for linking this, but Malkin blogs about her appearance.

Comments

  1. tom says:
    August 20, 2004 at 8:47 am

    would you hook it up with ann coulter on GP if you could? just for one night….

  2. matt says:
    August 20, 2004 at 8:56 am

    Hook up a verbal beating maybe. She’s a man baby.

  3. tom says:
    August 20, 2004 at 9:46 am

    but wouldnt it be great to be able to say “ann coulter? that ho likes to be called names and likes taking it in the back door.” i think that would be great.

  4. isabella says:
    August 20, 2004 at 10:50 am

    i hate myself for clicking on it. I got lucky though, “The page cannot be displayed”. Guess she is too ugly even for my work computer. Although the sensitive side of me wants to explain her through a comparison with self-hating minority groups the world-over who helped to facilitate their own genocide because of their internal pain …
    can’t control my sap–

  5. madden says:
    August 20, 2004 at 10:57 am

    I suppose that I think Michelle is kind of cute is my own personal shame. Believe me, it’s deeply conflicting. That said, why bother discussing her looks when she has left so many ridiculous, indefensible, and humiliating ideas on the table?

    We don’t marginalize Hannity’s physical appearance when he says something asinine. Calling someone an “uglier vesrion of Coulter” is a little Coulter-esque, isn’t it?

    On another note, Olbermann’s dismissal of the interview is excellent. I wish more people paid attention to him.

  6. matt says:
    August 20, 2004 at 11:01 am

    Hannity doesn’t put windswept photos of himself (at least I hope not) on his books and websites. And I promise you that a man with the intellect of Malkin would not even make it as a right wing pundit.

  7. ian says:
    August 20, 2004 at 11:36 am

    I agree with pretty much everything you say except that Michelle Malkin is nowhere close to being uglier than Ann Coulter. She’s out of her mind politics-wise but I can’t front, she is super hot and knocks Coulter way out of the box on that count (unless of course anorexic blondes are your thing).

  8. Shaun says:
    August 20, 2004 at 12:30 pm

    That was a beautiful movie, for those of us without cable. Thanks, guys.

    You 1115.org people have really been on a roll.

  9. Damien says:
    August 20, 2004 at 12:51 pm

    Probably not going to matter since the minds here are pretty made up, but the “self-inflicted wounds” claim is straight out of the book Unfit for Command.” Matthews didn’t read it, so he attributed it to her. Once they were off camera they had the producers madly try to determine *if* she was right, as clearly Matthews didn’t know (not that it prevented him from arguing the point on camera – who needs humility when u got ignorance?). They cut out her next segment. Very professional operation there.

  10. tom says:
    August 20, 2004 at 1:00 pm

    that bitch is lucky chris matthews didnt just whip it out and piss all over her on general principle. id take a three some with her and ann coulter, as long as i could videotape it.

  11. matt says:
    August 20, 2004 at 2:02 pm

    Yeah, minds around here are pretty made up. I read her site for any sign of intelligence and was left wanting.

    Go watch “Outfoxed” and learn how the “some say…” construct works to the right wing advantage. Malkin didn’t have her facts right, even when she quoted names, they were names of people who support Kerry’s version of events. He asked her to either put up or shut up (did she co-sign or not) and she wouldn’t answer, referring back to “some say…”

    Cowardly, stupid, ill-equipped for the task presented her.

  12. violent kitten says:
    August 20, 2004 at 2:05 pm

    Malkin was there to discuss the book. Those charges were made in the book. It’s not hard to understand that.

    In any event, you’re an internet hero.

  13. C Eliott J says:
    August 20, 2004 at 2:40 pm

    The President appears content to watch from the sidelines and let Malkin draw the attention. What a perfect job for a dumber, uglier, but just as psychotic version of Ann Coulter.

    Haha! You guys are awesome. You are the self-stilled “sensitive” and “feminine” protectors of the 1st amendment yet you personally attack (see above) a woman of Asian ancestry when she upsets you! haha! You dish out an easily refuted “Fahrenheit 911″ like it is gospel yet burn a book endorsed by 255 eyewitnesses without even reading it! haha! This is rich! I have to say, the whole liberal movement is starting to act more and more like Rick from the Young Ones!

  14. astralgirl01 says:
    August 20, 2004 at 3:38 pm

    Whatever… Malkin is crazy. Just look at the terms/tones she uses in her columns! She calls people “it,” “they,” and consistently refers to human beings of Arab decent as ANIMALS.

    Screw her (and that’s the VERY nicest term I could find to say it).

    Obviously she has a hate of self (how could ANY Asian-American ever support forced imprisonment of their own people… even after the government alrady has apologized for the practice?!?!)… and apparently she thinks by speaking in Good ‘Ol Boy terminology while flashing some cleavage and fluffing her hair will put her in the Ann Coulter big-time. Gross.

    She’s a waste of brain power.

  15. matt says:
    August 20, 2004 at 4:42 pm

    “You are the self-stilled “sensitive” and “feminine” protectors of the 1st amendment
    ”

    You forgot: French, unpatriotic, and librul. Did the talking points get smudged?

    I attacked her because she blithely impugned the integrity of a man who served rather than cowered.

    The Swiftiy Liars have already tripped themselves up, one by one. Follow the money.

    I can’t believe someone beat me to a Young Ones ref. That really gets my pet goat.

  16. mishu says:
    August 21, 2004 at 3:01 am

    Follow the money. HAHAHAHAHA.

    OK Deep Throat. Click the link and follow…

    The money!

  17. matt says:
    August 21, 2004 at 7:36 am

    The money that paid for the ad: click here.

    Illegal coordination between 527 and Bush campaign: click here.

  18. C Eliott J says:
    August 21, 2004 at 9:18 am

    You forgot: French, unpatriotic, and librul. Did the talking points get
    smudged?
    Ohh, I’m sorry about that. I keep telling my Zionist Master that he needs to
    go out and buy a new fax machine. You think John K. can float us some of his
    wife’s dead husband’s money to hook it up?

    I attacked her because she blithely impugned the integrity of a man who served
    rather than cowered.
    So that makes personal attacks and slurs alright? Cool, I need to write that
    down in my rules-of-engagement handbook (Don’t worry, I’ll credit your website).
    I’m guessing that you have proof and not conspiratorial assumptions to back
    up your implication that Pres. Bush cowered? I applaud Sen. Kerry’s willingness
    to serve, though EYEWITNESS accounts by 255 PEERS and SUPERIORS have reinforced
    my throughts that his service did more harm than good. BTW, when did serving
    in the US Military and killing people in 3rd world countries become a good thing
    for you? Also, I thought you guys didn’t believe in the Vietnam War, has that
    changed?

    The Swiftiy Liars have already tripped themselves up, one by one. Follow the
    money.     haha! Awesome… Money, you are going to bring up soft money?!?
    Please, can we talk about attack ads next? Is this going to be like M. Moore
    tying Pres. Bush to the Carlyle Group? I think I can end this with the name
    Soros. Here is a quick tie (and this is just off the top of my head): MoveOn.org
    makes an Ad comparing Pres. Bush to Hitler. George Soros is a chief contributer
    of MoveOn.org. George Soros supports John Kerry’s bid for the White House. John
    Kerry does not condemn the ad likening Pres. Bush to Hitler. Soooooo: John Kerry
    must be instructing his media machine to tell people that Pres. Bush is like
    Hitler. Is that how it works?

    Follow
    your own money    . – http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/11/politics/main582932.shtml
    Besides, I was under the assumption that free speech was being attacked in the
    US and that the truth should be heard by using any means necessary?

    “Swiftiy Liars”? I hope your evidence is better than your typing? You need to
    read “in full” two websites.
    Swift Vets for Truth
    – http://swift2.he.net/~swift2/index.php
    Winter Soldier – http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/
    Personally, I can’t believe that anyone would take John Kerry’s word over 255
    of his PEERS and SUPERIORS but I guess I am just a little wacky like that. I
    have read the Wash Posts/Boston Globes “attempts” at smearing these guys and
    it actually makes me a little sad. Sort of sad that they are being so shouted
    down without being heard but really sad to see biased reporters in such frantic
    desperation. Lets talk about your boy’s recollection of Vietnam… How many
    versions of this Christmas in Cambodia story are we going to get:
    ‘Version 1 of the Cambodia Story was written by John Kerry himself and
    published in the Boston Herald, October 14, 1979: “I remember spending Christmas
    Eve of 1968 five miles across the Cambodian border being shot at by our South
    Vietnamese allies who were drunk and celebrating Christmas. The absurdity of
    almost killed by our own allies in a country in which President Nixon claimed
    there were no American troops was very real.”"
    Version 2     of the Cambodia Story was told by Kerry in 1986 at a Senate committee
    hearing during a debate on U.S. policy toward Central America: “I remember Christmas
    of 1968 sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be
    shot at by the Vietnamese and Khmer Rouge and Cambodians and have the president
    of the United States telling the American people that I was not there; the troops
    were not in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared — seared — in me.”

    Version 3     of the Cambodia Story was told by Kerry to Kevin Whitelaw, in
    “A Mission to Cambodia”, by Kevin Whitelaw, May 08 2000, U. S. News and World
    Report: “Sen. John Kerry made his first forays into Cambodia during the Vietnam
    War as a Navy lieutenant on clandestine missions to deliver weapons to anticommunist
    forces. When he returned last week, the mission was official, but dicey nonetheless.
    At the request of the United Nations, Kerry is trying to broker a compromise
    on how to try leaders of the former Khmer Rouge regime, whose late 1970s reign
    of terror claimed the lives of some 1.7 million Cambodians.
    Version 4     of the Cambodia Story was released in an August 13th, 2004 statement
    from Martin Meehan of the the Kerry Campaign: In Meehan’s statement, the Kerry
    Campaign said John Kerry spent Christmas Eve 1968 in “the watery borders between
    Vietnam and Cambodia deep in enemy territory.” “In the early afternoon,” the
    statement continues, “Kerry’s boat, PCF-44, was at Sa Dec and then headed north
    to the Cambodian border. There, Kerry and his crew along with two other boats
    were ambushed, taking fire from both sides of the river, and after the firefight
    were fired upon again. Later that evening, during their night patrol, they came
    under friendly fire.”‘ Who is the liar again?

    I can’t believe someone beat me to a Young Ones ref. That really gets my pet
    goat.     Ohh, you can have it back. I’ve changed my mind about you being
    like Rick… The more I think about it the more GG Allin comes to mind. BTW,
    the book was called “Reading Mastery 2″ and the exercise was called “The Pet
    Goat” but I will forgive you. Just no more pithy comments based on Michael Moore
    nonsense, cool?

  19. rob says:
    August 21, 2004 at 6:30 pm

    I can’t believe someone beat me to a GG Allin reference. Damnit.

  20. CJ Marsicano says:
    August 21, 2004 at 11:11 pm

    If the kind of immigration controls that Ms. Malkin advocates were in place when her parents emigrated to this country, the only way she would be interacting with Americans on the Internet would be as an Asian webcam girl for $2.99 a minute.

  21. sam says:
    August 22, 2004 at 7:38 am

    Michele Malkin…Tera Patrick? Well?

    C’mon, you all see the resemblance.

  22. sam says:
    August 22, 2004 at 8:06 am

    I’m reading the transcript of the Hardball segment in which Chris Matthews interviews Larry Thurlow, and it’s painfully obvious from the dialogue that these Swift Boat for truth yahoos have been coached to tell this yarn about John Kerry’s “untrustworthiness”.

    It’s such a thinly veiled sham, it’s laughable. Ignominious.

    Every time Matthews tries to drill down to the crux of the matter, Thurlow goes back to this idea that Kerry lied about the events Cam Ranh Bay in order to “make a name for himself,” as if Kerry was thinking about running for President in 2004, instead of saving his ass in 1968. Please! I’m hoping some courageous soul will try to dig out the truth on this one, prove these guys have been paid lots and lots of money to tell these silly, outrageous lies.

    The ploys frankly saddens me. It’s a dirty, clearly diversionary tactic. They know the media will hook onto a story like this and disseminate it in order to fog up the windows. There’s a Presidential election taking place in less than 3 months. There are important issues and policies with people’s lives hanging in the balance, and this is what we’re treated to, this is the searing disrespect they have for us. Offering fabricated stories in order to discredit a presidental candidate. I know, I know, it’s not a new scheme, but the arguments here and the points raised defending this one, disproving that one are proof that the strategy is working.

  23. ellogoods says:
    August 22, 2004 at 9:29 am

    Watching the Hardball clip was sheer entertainment and reminds me why I like Chris Matthews. This whole internment issue is baffling! The fact that someone would make the argue for Interning the Japanese (as well as Germans and Italians- about 15,000- a tenth of the Japanese)- is truly shocking. And I am tired of those who bring up the handful of Japanese Americans who were found out to be helping the Japanese war effort etc.

    DOES ANYONE bring up the BOMBING OF THE MURRAH FEDERAL BUILDING in Oklahoma on April 19th, 1995! I certainly did not see any moves to intern American ex army white redneck types after that happened!! And just think, if Bush Jr. was president in 1995, we probably would of went and attacked some foreign nation for that bombing.

  24. ian says:
    August 22, 2004 at 11:53 am

    C Eliott J ,

    Can we get even one credible story about what Bush did during this National Guard service with some eyewitness accounts that corroborate him even being there?

    You don’t like Kerry? Fine, but these ridiculous and relentless attacks on whether he served honorably and/or deserved his medals are absurd and embarassing esp. in light of Bush own questionable service record.

    Let it go, fam.

  25. Miss Kitch says:
    August 22, 2004 at 12:56 pm

    Honestly, who gives a flying fuck about how Kerry was wounded? Is a scar really going to effect the way he runs the country. This is why I despise politics. It’s bullshit.

  26. Eric Muller says:
    August 22, 2004 at 1:24 pm

    Malkin’s thesis is dismantled here.

  27. C Eliott J says:
    August 23, 2004 at 5:54 am

    Ian,

    Can we get even one credible story about what Bush did during this National Guard service with some eyewitness accounts that corroborate him even being there?

    When Bush makes his military service a central focus of his campaign, I will be one of the first to ask this question. On the converse, can we get one credible document that backs up the left’s assertions that Bush went AWOL?

    You don’t like Kerry? Fine, but these ridiculous and relentless attacks on whether he served honorably and/or deserved his medals are absurd and embarassing esp. in light of Bush own questionable service record.

    I would agree if: A. Bush himself or his endorsed campaign was making the claims. (Loosely knit “friend of a friend” connections don’t mean anything in today’s world, just look at Friendster. The “6 degrees” theory does not hold up in a court of law.) B. Kerry wasn’t making his “valiant” service a central factor of his campaign. C. These other officers had no records/photos to back up their claims of being present at the so beclouded events.

    I say, release ALL of the military records for both candidates and let us see who is bluffing and who is telling the truth.

  28. matt says:
    August 23, 2004 at 7:45 am

    It doesn’t matter that Bush didn’t make service part of his campaign because he doesn’t have substantial service to point to. People who live in glass houses shouldn’t smear other people’s windows.

    John Kerry’s full military records, after action reports and command history here.

    Maybe you were fooled along with the media by the President’s document dump this spring, but I wasn’t. The relevant attendance and tax info were not included, and that is the only important bit.

    You are challenging the official Navy records when you only have Bush’s word on his missing records.

    Give it a rest. Know when to fold.

  29. C Eliott J says:
    August 23, 2004 at 7:23 pm

    Hi Matt,

    I’ll just try once more, using very simple logic this time.

    It doesn’t matter that Bush didn’t make service part of his campaign because he doesn’t have substantial service to point to. People who live in glass houses shouldn’t smear other people’s windows.

    Once again. Unwarranted attack based on biased assumption. Conspiratorial and unfounded assumptions on Bush and “supposedly linked” 527 money. Haven’t we been over this?

    John Kerry’s full military records, after action reports and command history here.

    Sweeping statement based on limited exposure. Obviously you don’t know much about military record keeping. Please follow this link.

    Maybe you were fooled along with the media by the President’s document dump this spring, but I wasn’t. The relevant attendance and tax info were not included, and that is the only important bit.

    Twice in one post!?! Conspiratorial and unfounded assumptions; (You must be a rather paranoid fellow) yet I will give you that I do wish (if they exist) to see the remainder of Pres. Bush’s military records. For further information on the subject please follow the above posted link.

    You are challenging the official Navy records when you only have Bush’s word on his missing records.

    If those records were written or effected by Sen. Kerry, you better believe I am challenging them.

    Wow, I can’t believe that I am typing this again and in such a short time constraint. Your contradictions in logic astound me! When did your initial post become about a “military records” urinating match between Pres. Bush and Sen. Kerry? When has Pres. Bush made his service ANY issue in this election cycle? From earlier post on August 21, 2004 09:18 AM: “BTW, when did serving in the US Military and killing people in 3rd world countries become a good thing for you? Also, I thought you guys didn’t believe in the Vietnam War, has that changed?”

    Sen. Kerry has repeatedly cited his service record as a cornerstone of experience in which to guide his “policy?” on the defense of our homeland. At this point in our history that defense is imperative. If Sen. Kerry’s record remained unblemished and steadfast it would not only be a plus to his candidacy but would all but secure the removal of the incumbent from the White House. Pres. Bush has not only taken wrong turns in the eyes of the left but also the right. The way I see it,… If I were Sen. Kerry, I would do everything (release all records/debate the accusers/etc.) to make sure no possible doubt could cast shadow on the shining star of service I so heralded. Yet he runs and he hides. He sends faxes from lawyers to TV stations threatening legal action if the ads are played. He tries with legal action to get the book pulled from shelves. Does he directly answer the accusers (255 of his PEERS and SUPERIORS who DID serve with him) and the accusations (that his stories of Vietnam are untrue), No. That is the ISSUE. That is the reason why Michelle Malkin was attacked and this thread started. It’s called damage control. Animals that are backed into a corner attack and attack erratically. Humans are animals.

    We could settle this whole quagmire by opening a gym, filling it with a few live TV news crews, John Kerry and the Swift Vets. Let the arguments carry their own water and we will see which has
    leaks. The truth is John Kerry’s talisman, wether it be good or bad for him we do not know now.

    Give it a rest. Know when to fold.

    Emotionally fueled outburst based on previously stated paranoia.

  30. matt says:
    August 23, 2004 at 7:55 pm

    In any case, you must have missed the stories in almost all of the major dailies detailing the lies and half-truths of the Swift Boat Liars. I’ve lost count of how many have changed their stories or wear medals based on the same reports. This doesn’t even pass the laugh test. Someone is keeping track here. Other than that, all I can see is that you want to muddy the water and conflate issues. But feel free to keep plugging ahead.

  31. ian says:
    August 25, 2004 at 9:28 am

    C Eliot J,

    On the converse, can we get one credible document that backs up the left’s assertions that Bush went AWOL?

    How can we when the Pentagon shredded them?

    Loosely knit “friend of a friend” connections don’t mean anything in today’s world, just look at Friendster.

    Bush Campaign Lawyer Quits Over Ties to Ad Group

  32. ian says:
    August 25, 2004 at 9:29 am

    C Eliot J,

    On the converse, can we get one credible document that backs up the left’s assertions that Bush went AWOL?

    How can we when the Pentagon shredded them?

    Loosely knit “friend of a friend” connections don’t mean anything in today’s world, just look at Friendster.

    Bush Campaign Lawyer Quits Over Ties to Ad Group

  33. John F. Kerry says:
    August 30, 2004 at 1:15 pm

    Kudos to Lardball host Chris “Ihave a stick up my ass and no one gets to talk except me” Matthews. Eat shit, you fat pig. Just wondering if he is so stupid as to not understand the difference between self-inflicted and “shooting himself”. What a fucking idiot.

  34. John F. Kerry says:
    August 30, 2004 at 1:40 pm

    1) Kerry has refused to release his Military records surrounding the incidents in question
    2) Kerry has refused to allow his own book “The New Soldier” to be printed
    3) According to the swift boat veterans and common sense Kerry’s 4 months in Vietnam were at worst, fictionalized, and, at best, far less heroic than his medals would imply.
    4) Kerry spent the immediate post war time making vicious statements against: the US, the military, its soldiers (baby killers, etc.) , and anti-communism.
    5) Kerry spent the remaining 25 years as one of the most liberal politicians in the country voting against the military more so than almost any other politician.
    6) As a presidential candidate and prospective commander-in-chief during war he had little or no credibility given this history. The polls continue to show this.
    7) Kerry, despite being a presidential candidate, has taken no position on the current War on Terror
    8) Kerry’s deceptive strategy given the above history is to pretend that he is now “reporting for duty” as if he is well qualified and eager to be commander-in-chief.
    9) Something like 65% of Americans don’t believe he would be a willing or effective commander-in-chief given his history but despite their huge dissatisfaction with Bush.
    10) Kerry’s response in addition to silence, refusal to release is records or book, or state a war policy, has been to accuse the Bush campaign of sponsoring the swift boat veterans.
    Some vague connections have been demonstrated which is no surprise given that they all seem to hate Kerry having served with him. But certainly the idea that Bush campaign somehow made all 250 of them lie is purely absurd.
    My personal point of view is that Kerry’s ultra liberal 25 years after the war, when he could not have been elected to dog catcher anywhere in America except Massachusetts is far more important than the 4 months in Vietnam. But still, when 250 of the guys who served with him and under him in Vietnam write a book saying he largely falsified his entire Vietnam experience you have to consider that even that tiny 4 month period is a meaningful indictment of a prospective commander-in-chief in time of war.

  35. bill says:
    September 7, 2004 at 2:04 pm

    to astralgirl01,

    Take note that Malkin is of Filipina ancestry, not Japanese. So in her mind she is not advocating putting her “own” people in jail. And remember that Japan was especially brutal in the Phillipines. There probably is some self-hate in her, but it’s probably not simply “asian” self-hate. I wonder what she sees when she looks in the mirror, because one day she will be detained at an airport because she’s not white, in spite of her name. Then let’s hear from her about profiling.

  36. Jonathon says:
    September 20, 2004 at 2:04 pm

    The first time I saw that tosser, was on an O’Reilly segment (when he was somewhat journalistic) post 9/11. She was hawking her fearmonger rag called “Invasion”. I’ve actually visited her website and had I not known about her background I could have sworn that I was reading some neo-Third Reicher crap. Ms. Malkin belongs to a certain group of Asians (a sort of sub-culture) that somewhat subscribe to the fantasy that the only two great races in the world that could do no wrong is: White or Asian. (Well, except Japanese in Malkin’s case). Believe me, I’ve come across a few. I’m half white/half black and my father is of German descent. I’m dating a Japanese girl. She’s actually introduced me to some of her friends and on a few occassions have actually told me some of their comments about me. It is enough to a light skinned black man to blush red in the face. Guess which SE Asian paradise, some of these clowns are hailing from? I found it interesting how she berated officer Moose for writing about his time with the Virginia/DC sniper case. I guess blacks are only good for putting their lives on the line, but shouldn’t write about it should they survive. Blimey.
    Ms. Malkin likes to kick the immigration policies in the ribs, often forgetting that her mum and dad were immigrants from the Phillipines. I guess it IS a pity that immigration quotas were near non-existent, that way the world would have been spared the wisdom and wit of this blithering, self-hating moron. And while she’s on the up and up bashing my fiancee’s country for its past atrocities, she’s overlooking the fact that her wonderful Philipines is an emerging and growing hotbed of militant Muslim fundamentalism with strong anti-American sentiment. Oh yes, that is happening TODAY, Ms. Malkin. And don’t you just love it when she gets all wide-eyed for dramatic effect as she tries to pound her “journalistic” propaganda home. Hey, Ann Coulter does that wide eye stuff too. What gives. Hmm, half black/half german and about to marry japanese. I guess I would be a triple threat to this twit. Dreadfully sorry for the baseless rant.

  37. John F. Kerry says:
    September 23, 2004 at 11:29 am

    1) Kerry has refused to release his Military records surrounding the incidents in question
    2) Kerry has refused to allow his own book “The New Soldier” to be printed
    3) According to the swift boat veterans and common sense Kerry’s 4 months in Vietnam were at worst, fictionalized, and, at best, far less heroic than his medals would imply.
    4) Kerry spent the immediate post war time making vicious statements against: the US, the military, its soldiers (baby killers, etc.) , and anti-communism.
    5) Kerry spent the remaining 25 years as one of the most liberal politicians in the country voting against the military more so than almost any other politician.
    6) As a presidential candidate and prospective commander-in-chief during war he had little or no credibility given this history. The polls continue to show this.
    7) Kerry, despite being a presidential candidate, has taken no position on the current War on Terror
    8) Kerry’s deceptive strategy given the above history is to pretend that he is now “reporting for duty” as if he is well qualified and eager to be commander-in-chief.
    9) Something like 65% of Americans don’t believe he would be a willing or effective commander-in-chief given his history but despite their huge dissatisfaction with Bush.
    10) Kerry’s response in addition to silence, refusal to release is records or book, or state a war policy, has been to accuse the Bush campaign of sponsoring the swift boat veterans.
    Some vague connections have been demonstrated which is no surprise given that they all seem to hate Kerry having served with him. But certainly the idea that Bush campaign somehow made all 250 of them lie is purely absurd.
    My personal point of view is that Kerry’s ultra liberal 25 years after the war, when he could not have been elected to dog catcher anywhere in America except Massachusetts is far more important than the 4 months in Vietnam. But still, when 250 of the guys who served with him and under him in Vietnam write a book saying he largely falsified his entire Vietnam experience you have to consider that even that tiny 4 month period is a meaningful indictment of a prospective commander-in-chief in time of war.

  38. beuwolf says:
    October 22, 2004 at 8:59 am

    I love this site, guys. Thought I was the only person that thought that this broad was waaaay out there. Actually, I found someone else that does.

  39. Sam Fields says:
    December 14, 2004 at 8:34 am

    Michelle Malkin is one of several Phillipines(her claim)women that I have known of that believe that their primary duty in the “community” is to
    hate people with their words. Michelle Malkin has found that she can make money on what she would do anyway.In the Phillipines, such women have a short life expectancy;but, Michelle Malkin is isolated in her home behind closed doors, with
    armed guards at her book-promoting events. Otherwise her own countrymen, and countrywomen, would “take care of her”, as they would others like her.

  1. SFist says:
    September 7, 2004 at 3:26 pm

    Conservative Pundit to Brave Berkeley
    One of Rush Limbaugh’s pet p…