More Boobgate Fallout
by Jason at 6:10 am on March 30th, 2004 in General
Ever since the infamous “wardrobe malfunction” during the Super Bowl halftime show, people have turned Janet Jackson’s breast into, sadly, the most pressing news story and social issue of 2004. There is much to be said about the fallout from this ill-advised publicity stunt. But one of the most interesting sub-stories is how Janet is being treated during her subsequent media stops. Shows are putting her on five second delays, as if they expect her to whip off her top at a moment’s notice. But here’s the real kicker: On last night’s Letterman show, nervous censors made sure to bleep out every offensive word spewing out of that harlot’s mouth.
Foul words like…uhm…”Jesus”.
Let that sink in for a moment. Because this is the reality of the post-boob era. Congress pats itself on the back by passing sharply increased fines for indecency, as if they didn’t have more pressing issues to focus on. But there is no definition for indecency; the standards are arbitrary. The media is so fearful of finding themselves on the wrong side of this fuzzy line that they are willing to self-censor themselves to an almost comical level.
Think this is going away soon? Hardly. Welcome to the new world of communication, pre-sanitized to avoid even the tiniest hint of offensiveness.
It’s pretty fucking ridiculous.
rob wrote:
five points to you sir for coming up with the concept of “post-boob”.
Posted 30 Mar 2004 at 7:20 am ¶
photosuperstar wrote:
the FCC will allow the use of the word “fuck” as an adjective, but fine for the use of the word “jesus”? (punctaition wrong, it’s late)
God Bless America!!
(sarcasm is a bitch)
Posted 31 Mar 2004 at 12:06 am ¶
Ellogoods wrote:
I dream of living in a world where I can say Fuck Jesus with impunity. It is funny to live in a country where talking about bodily secretions is considered to be indecent but Government officials routinely lieing to it’s citizenry is not considered indecent.
Posted 31 Mar 2004 at 10:07 pm ¶