Nascar Dads? You Can Have Them.

Can everyone stop talking about “NASCAR dads”? Just about every talking head on television and radio is gabbing about “NASCAR dads” just like they ran on about “soccer moms” during the ’96 and ’00 election cycle. “Soccer moms” were actually in play in 2000. Middle class suburban women with kids are often a key swing demographic. “NASCAR dads” (suburban working- and middle-class white men) always vote Republican. If the Democrats spend time and money going after these guys, this election may as well be over now.

From an IHT article about NASCAR:

It’s the prerace flyover, four F-16′s with the burners lit, 200 feet, or 60 meters, off the deck at 400 miles an hour, or 650 kilometers an hour, and the crowd goes crazy. The sky cracks and the smell of jet exhaust fouls the grandstands. I, sophisticated tourist sarcast, turn to Nascar dad, cock my eyebrow and shout, “Our tax dollars at work, huh?” He looks down at me through the beard, blue-eyed and red-faced in the heat. “Damn straight,” he says, “damn straight,” as tears roll down his cheeks.

Men who get weepy at the sight and sound of fighter jets don’t vote Democratic.

The Republicans can have them.

Comments

  1. gorilla says:

    The name is lame and clearly that is plain, but I would restrain, yeah, even refain from (writing a whole comment in rhyme)discouraging the Democratic party from spending money against working class white men and encouraging them to vote their economic interests – -I have some heart for the you’ve been bamboozled by the man strategy — I’ve seen it work among a similar audience here in michigan.

  2. matt says:

    Senate and House Dems spent money trying to get white men to vote their economic interest in 2002. Obviously it failed in a big way. This has been a goal since the “culture wars” started, and Dems consistently come up short. Either the economy will be (and more importantly appear) bad enough that people will have no choice but to vote for change, or it will be (or appear) better in which case no message of economic interest will work.

    These people know that people richer than themselves are getting massive tax breaks. They put up with it for two reasons:

    1. “values”
    2. They think that they will be rich someday. When polled, people consistently overestimate the wealth percentile they are in, and overestimate the rate of economic mobility. Simply put, they support tax cuts because they think they are benefiting from them or will soon.

    Stats show that the stagnation of economic mobility is at a decades long high.

    There is not enough money to counteract that message.

    That’s like the third time in recent days that a commenter here has told me that i have been fooled, tricked or now bamboozled.

    Go ahead, you can say you think I wrong, but no one is fooling me. I promise.

  3. rob says:

    i think you’re dead on with your comment about the perception of economic mobility. the horatio alger myth is dying (if it isn’t dead already).