Metrowhat?

I like my beer cold,
my tv loud,
and my homosexuals faaahlaming.
– Homer Simpson

What he said.

This was a subject I was going to ignore. The cacophony has been peaking
recently, and until now I was going to ignore it from the sidelines.

How could I continue to cover my ears when something like this happens:

From Tapped

I KNOW METROSEXUALS. METROSEXUALS ARE FRIENDS OF MINE. AND GOVERNOR, YOU ARE NO METROSEXUAL. He may attract “Queer Eye for the Dean Guy” signs at rallies and boast that a gay man has called him “handsome,” but Howard Dean is no “metrosexual,” as he claimed to be at a breakfast meeting in Colorado yesterday. For the record, no man who “has been known to stuff pretzels into his pockets,” goes anywhere with “shaving nicks on his neck, uneven fingernails and wrinkles from a hanger creasing his suit at the knees” (as has been documented in The Washington Post) and still wears a 20-year-old suit he bought for $125 at J.C. Penny’s (as Dean claimed on The Tonight Show that he does) can call himself a metrosexual.

14dean.184.jpg
Oh, sweet jesus. This man could be my party’s nominee for president.

My natural dislike for Mr. Dean just turned to rage. The piece goes on…

Everyone following Dean closely on the campaign trail knows two things. First, the man is an unrepentant cheapskate — during the weekend before the last debate, while most other campaign staffers stayed in a Detroit skyscraper, Team Dean slept at a budget hotel. And second, he wears very old clothes.

“Everybody thinks I’m very hip, but I am really a square,” Dean told the Denver Post today, backpedaling from his initial claim.

Anyway, I’ve secretly been praying (to God, Allah and Buddha just to be safe) that the word metrosexual goes away quickly.

Looks like I lose. Metrosexual is everywhere. I suspect I’m being
punished for praying to multiple gods.

Am I being oversensitive because I might be one? Maybe. But I’m not
going to stop using Baxter of California product,
Apple computers, or wearing Kenneth Cole clothes.

I like David Beckham for his wicked swerving free kicks, not because
he paints his nails. But I guess that liking soccer could be judged
as metrosexual, negating any progress that I made.

david.jpg
Beckham, sporting the faux-mohawk, takes the ball from Mos Def

Now there is a quiz that you can take to determine if you are one.
I’m guessing that no one out there would be surprised to know that I easily
got 10/10.

I know that part of my distaste for this word comes from my overall
hatred for our culture’s need to classify and categorize everything. Further,
what’s with the need for classification and categorization?
Lo-Fi? Neo-Con? Micro-tech? Get a life, now please.

I blame that show on Bravo (not Inside the Actor’s Studio, that other one).
Also the advertising industry.

You will have to excuse me while I run down to Sephora for some shaving cream.

Comments

  1. jamie says:

    Wow. This territory is just TOO rich. Matt IS a metrosexual. And as much as I hate that word, the fact that he has basically admitted it in an international forum is simply amazing!

    Matt is a clothes-horse (or is it clothes-whore, i was never quite sure of the wording on that one). I was once with Matthew when he purchased a shirt worth more than half my weekly take-home pay. It was a surreal experience for me, as I do not own a piece of clothing worth anywhere near the triple digits (aside from a dress I’m wearing to a party in celebration of my wedding which i didn’t even purchase with my own cash). I have a strict policy when it comes to shopping: “if it’s under 20 buy it, if it’s over 20, think real long and hard. If it’s over 100, you’ll probably just spill something on it anyway or lose it in the wash.” Matt is horrified by this policy and occasionally embarassed to be seen with me. This makes him a metrosexual. I think I’m still just a tomboy with bad fashion sense.

  2. matt says:

    I really don’t think that I can be blamed for buying shirts here

  3. jamie says:

    and that makes you a metro!